Jump to content

Hospital accreditation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hospital accreditation has been defined as “A self-assessment and external peer assessment process used by health care organizations to accurately assess their level of performance in relation to established standards and to implement ways to continuously improve”.[1] Critically, accreditation is not just about standard-setting: there are analytical, counseling and self-improvement dimensions to the process. There are parallel issues in evidence-based medicine, quality assurance and medical ethics (see below), and the reduction of medical error is a key role of the accreditation process. Hospital accreditation is therefore one component in the maintenance of patient safety. However, there is limited and contested evidence supporting the effectiveness of accreditation programs.[2][3][4][5][6]

Background

[edit]

Hospitals and healthcare services are vital components of any well-ordered and humane society, and will indisputably be the recipients of societal resources. That hospitals should be places of safety, not only for patients but also for the staff and for the general public, is of the greatest importance. Quality of hospitals and healthcare services is also of great interest to many other bodies, including governments, NGOs targeting healthcare and social welfare, professional organisations representing doctors, patient organisations, shareholders of companies providing healthcare services, etc. However, accreditation schemes are not the same thing as government-controlled initiatives set up to assess healthcare providers with only governmental objectives in mind - ideally, the functioning and finance of hospital accreditation schemes should be independent of governmental control.[citation needed]

How quality is maintained and improved in hospitals and healthcare services is the subject of much debate. Hospital surveying and accreditation is one recognised means by which this can be achieved.[citation needed]

It is not just an issue of hospital quality. There are financial factors as well. For example, in the USA, up until recently the Joint Commission exercised a de facto veto over whether or not US hospitals and other health providers were able to participate, and therefore earn from, the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This situation has changed in recent years.[citation needed]

National schemes

[edit]

Accreditation schemes recognised as providers of national healthcare accreditation services include:

The different accreditation schemes vary in quality, size, intent and the skill of their marketing. They also vary considerably in terms of the cost incurred by hospitals and healthcare institutions. They have varying degrees of commitment to assessing medical ethical standards and clinical standards.[citation needed]

International schemes

[edit]

Some accreditation schemes also undertake international healthcare accreditation work outside of their base country. One of the large number of accreditation schemes in the United States, the Joint Commission (TJC) currently being the best known, has created Joint Commission International, or JCI. In recent years, DNV have been challenging TJC in the USA. Accreditation Canada accredited its first organization internationally in 1967 in Bermuda.[8] In 2010, Accreditation Canada International (ACI) was created to provide accreditation to hospitals, clinics, primary care centers and health systems.[9] Acreditas Global (formerly AAAHC International) has been present in Peru since 2012 and Costa Rica.[10]

The former Trent Accreditation Scheme (TAS) from the UK was the first to accredit a hospital in Asia, in Hong Kong in 2000, and QHA Trent Accreditation from the UK have continue to work in the same field. Since TAS started the process, others, such as JCI and ACI, have entered the market.

DNV Healthcare is a Norwegian-US health care accrediting organisation providing a quality management system constructed in accordance with ISO 9001 and approved by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

ACSA International is a Spanish healthcare accreditation scheme implemented in Spain, Portugal and Brazil. ACSA INternational is Accredited by ISQua (International Socienty for Quality in Healthcare): Standards / Organisation / Surveyor Training Programme. An agreement between this entity and the Brazilian Institute for Excellence in Health (IBES) allows the Andalusian certification model for hospitals and clinical management units to be exported to Brazil.

CHKS Ltd is a specialist international provider of healthcare accreditation programmes based in the UK and accredited to ISQua and ISO 17021:2011 standards www.chks.co.uk

AACI is an international accreditation provider based in Hendersonville, NC, USA and accredited to ISQua, as well as ISO 17021:2015 standards

The OECI is an international organization of cancer centers with an accreditation and designation programme and accredited to ISQua.

The Council for Health Service Accreditation of Southern Africa (COHSASA) is the only internationally accredited quality improvement and accreditation body for healthcare facilities in Africa.

The IASIOS - International Accreditation System in Interventional Oncology Services. It is the world's only Interventional Oncology (IO) accreditation system. Operated by the Interventional Radiology Accreditation Service (IRAS) to establish the highest quality standards in IO. It is supported by 40 interventional radiology societies worldwide. The IASIOS was launched in 2021 and has 14 accredited centres and 42 enrolled and incoming facilities from Europe, Australia, South America, Asia, The Middle East, New Zealand and North America. The Standards of Quality Assurance in Interventional Oncology are essential in achieving the main goal of IASIOS.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Letter". BMJ. Archived from the original on October 3, 2009. Retrieved September 21, 2007.,
  2. ^ Hinchcliff, R; Greenfield, D; Moldovan, M; Westbrook, J.I; Pawsey, M; Mumford, V; Braithwaite, J (4 October 2012). "Narrative synthesis of health service accreditation literature". BMJ Quality and Safety. 21 (12): 979–991. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000852. PMID 23038406. S2CID 40661152.
  3. ^ Griffith, JR (2018). "Is It Time to Abandon Hospital Accreditation?". American Journal of Medical Quality. 33 (1): 30–36. doi:10.1177/1062860617707578. PMID 28467733.
  4. ^ Jha, Ashish K. (November 1, 2018). "Accreditation, Quality, and Making Hospital Care Better". JAMA Forum. A7 (1). doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2018.0043 (inactive 1 November 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  5. ^ Brubakk, K; Vist, GE; Bukholm, G; Barach, P; Tjomsland, O (23 July 2015). "A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects". BMC Health Services Research. 15: 280. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0933-x. PMC 4511980. PMID 26202068.
  6. ^ Armour, Stephanie (March 5, 2019). "Health-Care Industry Debates Hospital Accreditation Rules". WSJ. Retrieved 29 February 2024.
  7. ^ "QHA Trent". Archived from the original on 2010-06-26.
  8. ^ "About". International Accreditation Canada. 24 November 2020.
  9. ^ "Accreditation Canada International". ACI.
  10. ^ "Acreditas global". AAAHC. Archived from the original on 2015-02-19.
[edit]