Jump to content

Mayerling (1968 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the 1968 film. For other uses, see Mayerling (disambiguation).

Mayerling
Theatrical release poster by Tom Jung
Directed byTerence Young
Screenplay byTerence Young
Denis Cannan (dialogue)
Based onClaude Anet (novel)
Michel Arnold (book L'Archiduc)
Produced byRobert Dorfmann
Maurice Jacquin
StarringOmar Sharif
Catherine Deneuve
James Mason
Ava Gardner
CinematographyHenri Alekan
Edited byMonique Bonnot
Music byFrancis Lai (original)
Aram Khachaturian (non-original; Adagio from Spartacus)
Production
companies
Associated British Picture (UK)
Winchester-Corona Productions (France)
Distributed byWarner-Pathé (UK)
Valoria Films (France)
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (USA)
Release dates
  • 1968 (1968) (France, UK)
Running time
140 min
CountryUnited Kingdom / France
LanguageEnglish
Budget$5 million (estimated)
Box office$14.7 million [1]

Mayerling is a 1968 romantic tragedy film starring Omar Sharif, Catherine Deneuve, James Mason, Ava Gardner, Geneviève Page, James Robertson Justice and Andréa Parisy. It was written and directed by Terence Young.[2] The film was made by Les Films Corona and Winchester and distributed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

It was based on the novels Mayerling by Claude Anet and L'Archiduc by Michel Arnold and the 1936 film Mayerling, directed by Anatole Litvak, which dealt with the real-life Mayerling Incident.

Plot

[edit]

In 1880s Vienna, Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria clashes with his father, Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria and his mother Empress Elisabeth, about the implementation of progressive policies for the empire. Rudolf soon feels he is a man born at the wrong time in a country that does not agree on the need for social reform. The Prince of Wales, later to become King Edward VII of Britain, visits Vienna and provides comic relief. Later in Hungary a popular revolt breaks out, which Rudolf begs his father, Francis Joseph, to tolerate, but to no avail.

Rudolf finds refuge from his loveless marriage with Princess Stéphanie by taking a mistress, Baroness Maria Vetsera. Franz Joseph I sends his son to supervise military training, and exiles Maria to Venice. When back in Vienna, the couple's mutual deaths at Mayerling, the imperial family's hunting lodge, are cloaked in mystery. The film's ending suggests that the two lovers made a suicide pact when they decided they could not live in a world without love or prospects for peace.

Cast

[edit]

Accuracy

[edit]

Patrick Gibbs in The Daily Telegraph noticed several inaccuracies in the film's story, pointing out that only a small number of people knew of the affair between Rudolf and Maria (the film has them meeting publicly and ostentatiously dancing together at a court ball) and that the news of his death came as a shock to Franz Josef, who assumed his son had been assassinated. He also noted that the action seems to extend over a longer period than the reality (in fact the Prince of Wales's visit happened the preceding year) and that mental illness caused by syphilis was the contributing factor in the deaths.[3] Margaret Hinxman in The Sunday Telegraph, citing Joan Haslip's biography of the Empress, pointed out how often in the film she is present at significant events "when in fact she was more conspicuous by her absence".[4]

Production

[edit]

In a promotional interview, Terence Young described seeing the 1930s Charles Boyer-Danielle Darrieux film while reading history at Cambridge and being aware of the historical context: "The original story glossed over a good deal. I suppose the climate of film-making was less permissive then."[5][a]

Shooting took place mainly in Austria, with Viennese locations including the Heldenplatz, the Hofburg, the Schönbrunn Palace and the Spanish Riding School.[5][2] The scene where the Emperor and Prince Edward visit the Vienna State Opera for a ballet performance was filmed on a specially constructed set at the Boulogne Studios, Paris;[5] the film-makers also shot briefly in Venice.[2] The Times gave the length of the whole shoot as twelve weeks.[5]

Reception

[edit]

Derek Malcolm in The Guardian ascribed the film's failure to the central couple: "Omar Sharif as Rudolf goes about things like an exceptionally poor man's Larry Olivier... Catherine Deneuve is asked merely to look winsomely beautiful... They're a damp pair of star-crossed lovers and the final suicide pact seems quite silly."[7] Penelope Mortimer in The Observer struck the same notes: "Omar Sharif and Catherine Deneuve, as the lovers, are extremely tepid; they give no hint whatever of loving each other to distraction."[8]

Michael Billington, reviewing for The Times, found the film uninvolving ("ponderous without being weighty") and the character of Rudolf dislikeable, "an equivocal, oddly unattractive character... grandly announcing that if he has to be patient, so must the students, the poor and the oppressed". He added, however, "As so often, the best performance comes from James Mason who rightly plays the autocratic Emperor from his own point of view: as a preserver of law and order rather than an unenlightened despot".[9]

Patrick Gibbs wrote a lengthy review article for The Daily Telegraph, comparing the film's version of events with the historical record and concluding that the latter was more interesting: "The story as history tells it is so dramatic in its characters and incidents that it seems an extraordinary aberration to dilute it with the clichés of a costume romance".[3]

Margaret Hinxman in The Sunday Telegraph wrote of the film, "Neither dreamily romantic nor historically hard-hitting, it is simply a ponderous pageant of by-gone events." Nonetheless she singled out for praise Mason and Geneviève Page's performances.[4]

Dilys Powell in The Sunday Times acknowledged the steps the film-makers had taken to make the story more contemporary, but found the finished product unmoving: "There seemed to me to be a lot of dry eyes as we came out".[6]

Howard Thompson in The New York Times was positive about the production values, and Gardner's performance, but called the film "Like an expensive tapestry... beautiful, but flat."[2] Like a later reviewer for Empire, he felt that the film initially promised a political dimension that was then sidelined in favour of romance.[10]

Roger Ebert in The Chicago Sun-Times dismissed the movie: "Attain peace of mind before seeing "Mayerling." Compose yourself. This is a very long, slow, passive film... It has magnificent location settings, great scenery and costumes, spellbinding photography and, in short, everything except a story."[11]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Young did not elaborate, but comparing the two films Dilys Powell thought it unlikely "that in the mid-Thirties there would have been the sense of deliberate topical reference afforded by the new film with its scenes of student demonstrations and its background of Hungarian revolt. I doubt, too, whether thirty-odd years ago there would have been quite such suggestions of palace debauchery".[6]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Mayerling (1968) - JPBox-Office".
  2. ^ a b c d Thompson, Howard (14 February 1969). "Screen: Opulence of Austria-Hungary: New 'Mayerling' Opens at the Music Hall - Tragic Pair Played by Deneuve and Sharif". New York Times. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
  3. ^ a b Gibbs, Patrick (25 October 1968). "Diluting the Legend". The Daily Telegraph. No. 35302. p. 16.
  4. ^ a b Hinxman, Margaret (27 October 1968). "A Very Tedious Royal Scandal". The Sunday Telegraph. No. 402. p. 14.
  5. ^ a b c d "Mayerling again this summer?". The Times. No. 57197. 11 March 1968. p. 6.
  6. ^ a b Powell, Dilys (27 October 1968). "Lost in the Vienna woods". The Sunday Times. No. 7587. p. 60.
  7. ^ Malcolm, Derek (22 October 1968). "Pure as the driven slush". The Guardian. p. 6.
  8. ^ Mortimer, Penelope (27 October 1968). "Missing out on romance". The Observer. p. 28.
  9. ^ Billington, Michael (24 October 1968). "The wraith of Mayerling". The Times. No. 57390. p. 17.
  10. ^ Stefanski, Jane (1 January 2000). "Mayerling Review". Empire. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
  11. ^ Ebert, Roger (6 May 1969). "Mayerling". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 30 March 2024 – via RogerEbert.com.
[edit]
  • ‹The template AllMovie title is being considered for deletion.› Mayerling at AllMovie
  • Mayerling at IMDb
  • Mayerling at Rotten Tomatoes
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mayerling_(1968_film)&oldid=1243650653"