Talk:American automobile industry in the 1950s
American automobile industry in the 1950s has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possible sources
[edit]Will be adding some here of various quality.
- http://lincolncontinentalcars.webs.com/thehistory.htm
- http://books.google.com/books?id=RcR5vQwxOkQC Looks like a solid book to buy or use extensively
Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
De Soto or DeSoto?
[edit]Sources claim it is originally "De Soto" (Gunnel, (2004), Standard guide to 1950s American Cars page 72), but [1] from the source shows it in camelcase as "DeSoto", which is consistent with our other uses here, so that is the version I will use in the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review?Lbertolotti (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure what you mean. It's at GA status, are there any flaws or problems that you think put this into question? I don't think it is anywhere near ready for FA obviously. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 15:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
@Dennis Brown Passing a peer review helps with improving the article.Lbertolotti (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I went and read that, not something I've even visited before. I wouldn't have a problem with that. I'm working on a very different yet similar article on the 1960s that could benefit from what I see and learn from the experience. It's in userspace, but it is coming slow. Not sure every decade needs an article, but some decades can justify it. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- There is uncited text in the article, including some tagged with "citation needed" since March 2023 and a very large paragraph.
- History.com is used as a source, which is considered unreliable on Wikipedia (WP:RSPHISTORY). Are "Auto Universum" and "supercars.net" considered reliable?
Is anyone wiling to address these concerns, or should this be taken to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class United States History articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Automobile articles
- Mid-importance Automobile articles
- GA-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles