Talk:Kaiparowits Formation

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Geology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Utah Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Utah.

Not sure it this is the place to put this, but the article suggests there are two species of Deinosuchus present in the Kaiparowits Formation, D. hatcheri and D.riograndensis. The references cited for the presence of D. riograndensis is a presentation abstract that does not refer the specimen to a specific species of Deinosuchus, just the genus. The paper cited for D. hatcheri appears to be talking about the same specimen and shares a co-author. D. riograndensis should be removed from the list, with Reference 16 being cited for the presence of the genus and Reference 15 for the referral D. hatcheri. TA Holmes 2600:1700:B5A0:1B20:C8C2:BE81:296E:AFEE (talk) 20:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]