Template talk:Papacy

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Catholicism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity This template is supported by WikiProject Catholicism. Organizations This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization Classical Greece and Rome This template is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome Italy This template is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Europe This template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope

This template was considered for deletion on 2019 May 27. The result of the discussion was "Do not merge".

@Chicbyaccident: Listing all of the tiaras individually is out of all proportion to their importance. Most of the articles are stubs or don't exist. One link to Tiara where we already have it under Vestments is sufficient. The links to List and Decoration are particularly unmerited. This template should have a sense of proportion.

In fact, WP would be much improved if all the info in these entries were merged into a single article called Papal tiara. See, for example, Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom. There are links from there only to items that merit their own entry. The fact that something exists does not mean it merits an entry on WP and does not mean it should be included here as a separate listing.

The Austrian Tiara is not the Pallium. It's not even the Umbraculum. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 00:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Alright, I see your arguments. But could you then please restore Template:Papal tiaras? Chicbyaccident (talk) 07:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]