User talk:Aliceinthealice

Hello, Aliceinthealice, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jose Petrick, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA0808 ^talk_contribs 00:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice

Thank you for creating Ida Standley.

User:DGG, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job- For the future, please remember we refer to people by teir last name, not their first name.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DGG}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DGG ( talk ) 20:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hold up, why should one be referred to by their last name? Any convention or WP rule as to this? If the subject wants to be called by their first name, does their last name still have to be used instead? Natsuikomin (talk) 08:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on Kuprilya Springs Pipeline. Best Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 12:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Darren, Still learning but very keen, thank you for all the help!

No worries, if you ever need a hand let me know. Cheers. Hughesdarren (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on Ben Nicker, I added a link to Halls Creek which I assumed is the one in WA and another to Anmatjere, Northern Territory from Aileron. Hope these are both correct. Keep up the good work! Hughesdarren (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never cite Wikipedia to itself. DS (talk) 14:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Thank you

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you so much for expanding the range of articles available on central Australian subjects. It's great to see some informative new pieces. Had always wanted to have one on Marina Strocchi - and now there is! hamiltonstone (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edith Espie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edith Espie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 11:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bindi Mwerre Anthurre Artists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable org. primary sourced pr. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Aliceinthealice, I wanted to give you a heads up that your article on Gloria Ouida Lee was nominated for deletion, and it seems the nominator has forgotten to notify you. Thus, I am reaching out to you to notify you. I worked on improving the article, and it has been fascinating to learn about her life. LINK to the AfD discussion that is taking place. Netherzone (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bindi Mwerre Anthurre Artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bindi Mwerre Anthurre Artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alice, just letting you know I have made changes, introducing some additional reliable sources for the article, you might like to check out. I think it's stronger now. hamiltonstone (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robert Stott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Splinemath (talk) 02:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alice, just letting you know, in case you hadn't already seen, that this Proposed deletion has been reversed. hamiltonstone (talk) 10:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For running today's edit-a-thon. Although you may be sick of cake by now. Tenniscourtisland (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged the articles now. You could have redirected your article yourself but no worries. I'm not sure which is the better title. It is better if you put messages on my talk page.--Grahame (talk) 11:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice

Thank you for creating Amelia Kunoth.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

An interesting, well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm a New Page Reviewer - one of the people that marks your new articles as 'patrolled' when they come through the system. The article on Doris Blackwell was written and completed to a high standard; I note you've created more than 120 articles on Wikipedia (details here). Please so consider applying for the Autopatrolled status for your account. This means that you are a trusted article creator and your subsequent new articles won't go through the review process; this makes life easier for you and for the New Page Reviewers (as there are fewer in our backlog). It's a simple process and the form to do so is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled. Thanks for your contributions. Good luck, best wishes etc. Zakhx150 (talk) 16:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Doreen Thomas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice. Thank you for your work on Mayse Young. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice. Thank you for your work on Jim Bowditch. Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs an Awards and Honours section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 16:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanya Heaslip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Heaslip until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

duffbeerforme (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice. Thank you for your work on Mick Daly and Gladys Namagu. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work on your new article. I would suggest including it in appropriate Wikiprojects, such as Biogrpahy and Australia. Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 20:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Darwin Rocksitters Club.
Message added 06:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aliceinthealice, will you be able to address the concerns raised in the nomination page? If you can, please do so and the nomination can continue, but if not it will be marked for closure. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Narutolovehinata5 and apologies for the delay; I have changed the first sentence and added a citation about crocodiles in the area; it is generally accepted so I didn't contain a reference earlier (although I do know that everything needs to be cited!) and I am not sure about the quality of the reference I did add. Also as far as copy editing I am sorry but I cannot see what needs to be changed but do know my work often needs some copy editing help so if someone could make the required changes that would be much appreciated.Aliceinthealice (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aliceinthealice. Thank you for your work on Nayombolmi. Another editor, Netherzone, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article on a fascinating Jawoyn visual artist in the tradition of rock art and bark painting. It's wonderful to learn about their work, and thanks again to bringing it to our readership.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also wanted to mention that I've added an infobox, and retained all the fields in the template. These can be filled in from information in the article and as newly sourced material is found. It's great to know of your work here! Netherzone (talk) 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Darwin Rocksitters Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Darwin Rocksitters Club had "no funny business" as their first, third, and fifth rules? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Darwin Rocksitters Club. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Darwin Rocksitters Club), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harold Thomas (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eccentric.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aliceinthealice. Thank you for your work on Death of Yokununna. Another editor, Chocmilk03, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article about an important historic event.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chocmilk03}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annie Lock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Observer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alice, I note in your recent edit to The Channon, New South Wales, you cite 2 theories regarding the origin of the name, the second being that the name was brought with them by the Currie family, who were originally from Scotland (source being the relevant entry by the NSW Geographical Names Board). Actually I think that the Geographical Names Board is incorrect here (no fault of yours) but has jumbled information about the Currie family, who were indeed from Scotland and brought with them the name "Dunoon" (an adjacent village), who supposedly also suggested the name "Channon", but in that case not from Scotland but based on the local aboriginal word as separately stated (source for this is Pauline Barratt's book published in 1999, which appears to have been garbled in its transposition to the NSW Geographical Names Board website). I have given feedback to this effect to the NSW Geographical Names Board via their online comments form so, if they change the entry there, one of us can then change the article to remove the second suggested derivation, which seems to be an error... Otherwise thanks for your efforts! Best wishes, Tony Rees, northern NSW (not far from The Channon village in fact). Tony 1212 (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tony 1212 thank you so much - I have removed the alternate theory and, yes, the Dunoon one seems much more likely! I am also living in the Northern Rivers and, as a recent arrival, am having fun exploring! Thanks again. Cheers Aliceinthealice (talk) 22:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff, thanks for your rapid response + action... Cheers Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Tyagarah Nature Reserve. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I made a mistake and meant to put that in my sandbox! Thank you for your help. I will add to this and move it to main space when it is ready. Apologies again! Aliceinthealice (talk) 03:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Queen (biomechanist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jill L. McNitt-Gray. Thanks! Jaireeodell (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I have removed the offending sentences identified by Jaireeodell.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jill L. McNitt-Gray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliceinthealice! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 13:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aliceinthealice. Thank you for your work on Alfred Joseph Voules Brown. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions.

Baqi:) (talk) 05:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]