User talk:JWULTRABLIZZARD

Welcome!

Hello, JWULTRABLIZZARD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you have the dates wrong for the Dominion of Kenya. Looking at List of heads of state of Kenya, History of Kenya#Independence and Malcolm MacDonald it would appear that the dominion was from December 1963 to 1964 rather than from 1962 to 1963. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; you're quite right. Have made corrections accordingly. Many thanks.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the "preview" feature, you can check whether your edits are correctly formatted before saving them. DrKiernan (talk) 11:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-Apologies, I saved the page before I had finished it. I want to add separate succesion boxes for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, South Africa, India, Pakistan and Ceylon, but I'm not absolutely sure how. Any advice?

I'd argue that they're already covered by "King of the ... dominions", so I don't think they are necessary. DrKiernan (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But nevertheless it wouldn't be incorrect to put that at all, particularly in light of the fact that with Elizabeth II's succession boxes, each of the nations she is/was queen of are covered.

-Also, there are some commonwealth realms he ceased to be king of during his reign as king of the UK, (ie India and Newfoundland) as well as new commonwealth realms/dominions being created during his reign(India, Pakistan, Ceylon), so to give it a blanket 'it says hes king of the dominions, that covers it' doesn't really make sense as he was king of india 1947-1950, but he was king of newfoundland 1936-1947, and he was king of pakistan from 1947-1952 and king of ceylon 1948-1952.

I think you've misunderstood. The succession boxes specifically relate to "Regnal titles" not to territories ruled. These have only been regnal titles in the reign of Elizabeth II. None of her predecessors used them. DrKiernan (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-I'm well aware that titles such as 'King of canada', 'King of australia' etc. weren't used previous to Elizabeth II; her predeccesors being 'merely' 'King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of the British Dominions beyond the seas' but was unaware that the succession boxes related to titles and not territories. In which case, feel free to reverse my edits re. this.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that it was distinct from the nation that it is now, but I challenge the necessity for a standalone article. If it were to go to AfD, I'd be willing to wager that a result would either be redirect or merge into the existing article. Strikerforce (talk) 14:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

because there already were similar articles pertaining to pakistan, south africa, newfoundland, india and ceylon, unauthored by me, already on wikipedia, so why not for T&T?

Typically, other stuff exists is not a valid argument for keeping something around. Strikerforce (talk) 14:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-I would disagree in this particular case. My intention was to create a page for each commonwealth realm that existed, regardless of length of this status.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Kenya (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History_of_Kenya#Independence. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History_of_Kenya#Independence - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 20:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Kenya (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History_of_Kenya#Independence. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History_of_Kenya#Independence - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 04:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Trinidad and Tobago (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Republic_of_Trinidad_and_Tobago#Independence. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Republic_of_Trinidad_and_Tobago#Independence - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 10:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Gambia (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History_of_The_Gambia#20th_century_on. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History_of_The_Gambia#20th_century_on - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 10:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Sierra Leone (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Sierra_Leone#Early_independence_.281961_-_1991.29. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sierra_Leone#Early_independence_.281961_-_1991.29 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 10:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Malawi (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of Malawi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of Malawi - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 11:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Federation of Nigeria (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History_of_Nigeria#Independence. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History_of_Nigeria#Independence - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 11:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Ghana (commonwealth realm). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History_of_Ghana#Independent_Ghana. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History_of_Ghana#Independent_Ghana - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 11:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if it seamed like I was making accusations towards you about you hating scene kids and stuff that seemed like personal, all those months ago, just because you made some edits on this page. You dissapeared off wikipedia for several months, had to assume you got bored or whatever, please accept my apology. But fair enough for the new edit with just being described as a fusion genre, I doubt there is any source that says that it's extreme metal, and hardcore punk straight up is quite contentious. Jonjonjohny (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. No apology needed my good man. And 'fusion genre' certainly describes it much better :)JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you as the individual assigned to the house of Orleans are securities which it claims, but he was unsuccessful in the application to bring the full arms of France, the rule of succession to the throne of France can be challenged of course, but not the crests of the devolution of the legitimate heir of the full arms of France was the eldest of the house of Bourbon, Louis de Bourbon, on the other emblems of Orleans by the law is that of the Count of Paris other emblems in my opinion should be designated by their names, not the land of their so-called owner. You can answer me on my French page of Wikipedia. thank you [1] SanglierT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.141.96.249 (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'in my opinion' -there is absolutely no evidence that the other members of the House of Bourbon use different arms to the head; there is evidence regarding the House of Bourbon. If you have evidence regarding the House of Bourbon, please provide it, otherwise, kindly stop editing what I have put.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 22:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you on the fact that the Spanish Bourbons and the Orleans claim separately in identical securities, notament the head of the House of France. That's why I think this page is intended to further explain the term of cadency of the house of France rather than to feed their dynastic quarrels. That is why I support the failure to place any name below the coats of arms.a moins que vous soyez en mesure de prouver qu'il ne peut y avoir aucune contestation sur ce titre de chef de la maison de france. unless you are able to prove that there can be no dispute on this as head of the house of France. Refer you please to respective page of the Count of Paris and the Duke of Anjou (Louis XX) and look on the internet you will see that there is a different between the two branches of the family. I do not think wikipedia is the place to highlight the dynastic claim one or the other. Thank you to give a more neutral than that which currently exists. cordially — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.141.96.249 (talk) 06:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say there was 'no dispute' between the Orleans branch and the Bourbon branch; of course there is!But there is no evidence to show that anyone from the Bourbon branch uses differenced versions of the royal arms. In fact, 'Louis XX' does not use the plain arms of France (Azure, three fleur-de-lys or), he uses the arms of France (Azure, three Fleur-De-Lys Or)divided per pale with those of Spain (Quarterly, 1.Argent, a Castle Or, (Castile) 2, a Lion rampantPurpure (Leon)3,Paly of seven or and gules (Aragon) 4, gules, a chain or, in the centre, an emerald proper,(Navarre), in base, a pomegranete slipped and leaved or (Granada))

HOWEVER, there is evidence to show that the Orleans branch uses cadency as regards the arms used by its members: http://www.heraldica.org/topics/france/roygenea.htm

as regards 'placing the names', I am more than willing to put which members of both branches use what arms. Say, for example, if the arms of the eldest son of 'Louis XX' can be proven to be the same as the Orleanist 'Dauphin', I will gladly add his name, details, and information regarding the dispute underneath the respective arms. It is only fair.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i agree with you, just put the title betwin " " because for all its pretention but not possession of this different title. See for Louis de Bourbon, "king of France" and [2], for his first son Louis, "duke of Burgundy" and it's second son Alphonse "duke of Berry". And for the title of duke of Anjou see this page Counts and dukes of Anjou its very very very intresting to understand a part of the different betwin the two branchs of the Bourbon familly. As for the claims of these two families, one can conclude without any doubt that the elder is Louis de Bourbon, is what it puts in mind for each of the succession in his opinion. But I think that we should not introduce Orleans (or Bourbon) as heir of the kings of France if it is clearly biased. Here feel free to ask me question if I am not quite clear. If you can on my talk page. thank you [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.141.96.249 (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Deathcore. I have replied. Abhijay ^Talk?/_Deeds 17:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Abhijay. As have I. :)JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for the reply. I understand your concern fully. If something problematic like this occurs in the future, just let me know :) Let's put this matter to bed now. Enjoy your life at Wikipedia. Thanks and Merry Christmas. Abhijay ^Talk?/_Deeds 02:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monarchy of Ghana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gold Coast and Her Majesty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• List of the last monarchs in Africa
• List of the last monarchs in Asia

Would you have a look at these articles please? Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

warmest greetings; Mr Hall of England. What exactly did you want me to look at as regards these articles? The Asia article does not exist; btw :s JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 11:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Asia one could be the same as the africa one. Mr Hall of England (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Monarchy of India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to His Majesty

Monarchy of Nigeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Federation of Nigeria

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there how are you?

Do you think that the Emperor of India article should be merged with this article Monarchy of India?

I think it should because they are both the same. I know that the Emperor of India was a title within the British Monarchy.

So do you tink it is a good idea?

Mr Hall of England (talk) 15:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC) No, leave it as it is. Although the Emperor/Empress of India title was of course allusive to the British Crown attaining sovereignty over India (and indeed the royal proclaimation in which it was adopted said exactly that); India nonetheless remained British territory; albeit the largest chunk of it. By all means add a link to the 'Emperor of India' page.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arms of Dominion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to King Albert II, National, Arms and Maximillian I

Monarchy of Iceland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Occupation

Monarchy of Mauritius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Her Majesty

Monarchy of Uganda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Her Majesty

Prince Erik, Duke of Västmanland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Learning difficulties

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am grouping List_of_royal_houses#Americas. Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago all go together under commonwealth realms? Do I need to separate some of them into a separate group? -Enric Naval (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC) -In fact a few more countries need to be.added to that list:Barbados, The Bahamas, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda, Belize and St. Christopher and Nevis are all also presently commonwealth realms. You are correct in saying that all the countries on your above list are commonwealth realms; but Trinidad and Tobago isn' t now-it became a republic in 1976. Other countries that were formerly commonwealth realms (or the earlier term, dominion) in the Americas were Guyana (1966-1970), and Newfoundland (1907-1949)JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have created all the articles of the Commonwealth realms.

The only ones I have not done are:

• Fiji - There is the article but I want to make it the same as the other realms.
• Ireland - I planned to created on article of the Monarchs from 1171 to the end of the Irish Free State.
• Newfoundland - The is an article but as a Canadian province.

What do you think? I would like to work with you on these?

Mr Hall of England (talk) 21:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; which are the new ones you've created?JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 11:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federation of Nigeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armorial of the Presidents of the United States of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am improving the Royal Houses and there is a lot missing.

What would you recommend me to do to improve it?

Mr Hall of England (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; do you mean the page 'list of royal houses'; because that page is a mess.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 20:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am, also could you help me with the article please to see where I am going wrong? Mr Hall of England (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duke of Normandy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Treaty of Paris, Henry III and John II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armorial of the Presidents of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Higgins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please make the distinction between an article about an (existing) armorial, and a page which is an armorial made by yourself. Place articles about notable armorials in Category:Armorials. Lists of coats of arms compiled by yourself:

• qualify as WP:LIST articles
• need proper references, just like any other Wikipedia page, WP:CITE. A link to a website is not a "reference".
• should be placed in Category:Lists of coats of arms

I would also recommend naming the "list of coats of arms of..." not "armorial of...", because the latter title suggests you are describing, not compiling, an armorial. Thank you. --dab (𒁳) 07:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit here, the dominion of Pakistan was succeeded by both East and West Pakistan, which was at that time known as Pakistan(United), but after the secession of East Pakistan, only West Pakistan was left, and the article of Pakistan refers to the modern day West Pakistan only, so I have also added East Pakistan, as modern day Pakistan does not refer to East Pakistan. Hope you get it, Anyway, if you any further problem to discuss, you are welcome at my talk! Faizan (talk) 08:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-No; that's completely incorrect. There is absolutely no constitutional difference between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1956-1971 and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1971-the present day, it just happens that 1956-1971, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan included East Pakistan, whereas know it does not. There was no such constitutional entity as 'Pakistan(United)', this was an informal designation that did not officially exist.

East Pakistan and West Pakistan were merely Provinces of Pakistan; they were not sovereign states in their own right, and thus should not be listed as successor states.

Furthermore, Pakistan became a republic in 1956, but the provinces of East Pakistan and West Pakistan were created in 1955. So that means that East Pakistan and West Pakistan could not possibly succeed the Dominion of Pakistan because not only did they exist whilst Pakistan was still a monarchy and dominion, they were parts of it.

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 13:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also don't forget to read my reply about Quaid! Faizan (talk) 13:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i noticed you fixed the Colombian coat of arms' blazon, see, I tried my best to do it myself so I learned a little bit about heraldry but obviously I made many mistakes. I just didn't know who to go to for the correct blazon, anyway, thanks for fixing that. --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 04:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander of Battenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferdinand I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Martin Mutschmann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hirschberg

Philipp Wilhelm Jung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Worms

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Matty.007. JWULTRABLIZZARD, thanks for creating Armorial of the Presidents of Iceland!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Looks good, just needs references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Matty.007 17:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Philip the Good may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
Good''' {{lang-fr|Philippe le Bon}}, {{lang-nl|Filips de Goede}}; 31 July 1396 – 15 June 1467) was [[Duke of Burgundy]] as '''Philip III''' from 1419 until his death. He was a member of a [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fritz Bracht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heiden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Todor Pavlov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Simeon II

Tsvetko Boboshevski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Simeon II

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ahmed Cevad Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Statesman

Ahmed Muhtar Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Statesman

Alexander Karatheodori Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Statesman

Alexandros Kallimachis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Statesman

Bulgarian unification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ottoman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for taking the time to create so many articles on the Princes of Samos! However, in future please take a little more time to properly format them per WP:MOS so that other users will not have to clean up afterwards. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 09:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Konstantinos Karatheodoris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pirgos, Platanos and Vathi

Stephanos Mousouros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pirgos, Platanos and Vathi

Alexandros Mavrogenis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zoodohos Pigi

Konstantinos Adosidis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vathi

Konstantinos Photiadis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vathi

Konstantinos Vagianis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Neapolis

Pavlos Mousouros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vathi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armorial of the Vice Presidents of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armorial of the Presidents of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theodor Korner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Seal of Missouri may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |motto = '''Salus populi suprema lex esto''' (Latin:'United we stand, divided we stand'

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingdom of Italy (Holy Roman Empire), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Francis II and Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JWULTRABLIZZARD,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Juan de García y Montenegro for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Gfosankar (talk) 14:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello excuse me disturb you, I dunkerqueenflandre Wikipedia France.

I do not have an account in your country but Commons, I asked you a question about your account COMMONS, could you please respond.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JWULTRABLIZZARD#Knights_of_the_Order_of_the_Seraphim

Thank you in advance good day dunkerqueenflandre — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.93.210.17 (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warmest greetings, dunkerqueflandre.

I'm afraid I don't have a physical copy of the book in question so I simply don't know. If I can help in any other way, I would be very happy to help.

Yours,

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello, thank you for your answer, you do not know if a site or a blog on the net I can find.

thank you in advance good evening to you

cordially DUNKERQUEENFLANDRE https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Dunkerqueenflandre — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.93.210.17 (talk) 15:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tsvyatko Boboshevski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simeon II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have a question here about an aspect of this edit to the article "Dominion of Fiji". There is a sentence which, I think, needs to be clarified / corrected. Thanks. Aridd (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is controversial and as you see has been reverted by another editor, just as I did previously. If you insist on adding this again I suggest you bring it to the talk page for a consensus first. ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why it's controversial. George V was monarch of the Irish Free State, as was Edward VIII. Simple.

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 11:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Ironholds. JWULTRABLIZZARD, thanks for creating Georgios Verovits!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to the new articles you create.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 20:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Coat of arms of Lesotho may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}
• *[http://www.fotw.net/flags/ls).html Flags of the World - Lesotho: Coats of Arms]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JW, and thanks for providing a reason for your edit to Duchy of Normandy. A couple suggestions for you to consider that will make it easier for us all to work together:

• Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
• Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 15:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I mention Dominica's status simply to highlight the fact that none of the other Caribbean islands which are Commonwealth members have become republics, in response to the pedantic 'Citation needed'. Quiensabe (talk) 17:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put 'citation needed'.

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on National Order of Merit of Mauritania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JDDJS (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

German Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Order

Order of Saint Mark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Passant

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of Princely Heritage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Cross of July, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lafayette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I take it deleting my post must be a mistake....could I get you to put it back please. -- Moxy (talk) 18:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warmest greetings, Moxy.

I'm not sure which post you mean exactly :S You posted with a reference to a book, then I replied with some references from the Oxford English dictionary-if you could point out which post you mean I will happily put it back-I would not delete anyone's post-that's not in the spirit of wikipedia; and if I have deleted a post by accident be assured it was not done on purpose and you have my full and unreserved apology.

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JWULTRABLIZZARD. In reference to your edits on the subject page, I hope you are aware of the Edit warring policy and the 3RR rule. I suggest, you should take the issue to the talk page. Happy Editing. -- SMS ^Talk 13:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yahya Muhammad Hamid ed-Din, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page None (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of coats of arms of the House of Karadjordjevic may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
}} {| class=wikitable |+ {{font|size=116%|text= |[[Petar II]], King of Yugoslavia 1934-1945]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of coats of arms of the House of Karadjordjevic

added links pointing to Petar II, Petar I, Aleksandar Karadjordjevic and Aleksandar I

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jevram Obrenović

added a link pointing to Porte

List of coats of arms of the House of Karadjordjevic

added a link pointing to Prince Alexander of Yugoslavia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Napoleon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page None. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of titles and honours of Queen Elizabeth II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

{{cite web| url=http://gg.ca/media/fs-fd/p3_e.asp Oath of office| title=Governor General of Canada > Media > Fact Sheets > Oaths of Office| publisher=Rideau Hall| accessdate=28 October 2008}}{{dead link|date=February 2010} url=http://www.burkespeerage.com/articles/peerage/page62-6a.aspx |title=Burke's Peerage and Gentry > The Royal Family > HM Queen Elizabeth II |publisher=Burke's Peerage & Gentry and The Origins Network |accessdate= gov.uk/MonarchAndCommonwealth/NewZealand/TheQueensroleinNewZealand.aspx| title=The Monarchy Today > Queen and Commonwealth > The Queen's role in New Zealand| publisher=Buckingham Palace| accessdate=29 October 2008}}</ref> VI]]<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page4887.asp| title=The Monarchy Today > Queen and public > Honours > Royal Family Orders| publisher=Buckingham Palace |accessdate=29 October 2008}}</ref> || <ref>{{cite web| url=http://gg.ca/honours/nat-ord/oc/index_e.asp| title=Governor General of Canada > Honours > National Honours > Order of Canada| publisher=Rideau Hall| accessdate=30 October 2008}}</ref> || ref>{{cite web| url=http://gg.ca/honours/nat-ord/omm/index_e.asp| title=Governor General of Canada > Honours > National Honours > Order of Military Merit| publisher=Rideau Hall| accessdate=30 October 2008}}</ref> || www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/medals/order_of_australia.cfm| title=Government of Australia > Honours > Awards > A–Z of Awards > Order of Australia| publisher=Commonwealth of Australia| accessdate=30 October 2008}}</ref> || //www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/overview/qso.html| title=Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet > New Zealand Honours > The Queen's Service Order| publisher=The Crown in Right of New Zealand| accessdate=30 October 2008} order_of_saint_lucia/constitution_of_the_order_of_saint_lucia.htm| title=Government of Saint Lucia > Constitution of the Order of Saint Lucia| publisher=Government Information Service| accessdate=30 //www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/overview/onz.html| title=Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet > New Zealand Honours > The Order of New Zealand| publisher=The Crown in Right of New Zealand| accessdate=30 October 2008}} //www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/overview/nzom.html| title=Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet > New Zealand Honours > The New Zealand Order of Merit| publisher=The Crown in Right of New Zealand| accessdate=30 October {{cite web| url=http://gg.ca/honours/nat-ord/ormp/index_e.asp| title=Governor General of Canada > Honours > National Orders > Order of Merit of the Police Forces| publisher=Rideau Hall| accessdate=30 October 2008}}</ref> || "2" | [[Order of Christ|Grand Sash and Cross of the Three Orders of Christ Aviz and Santiago]] (the [[Order of Christ]], the [[Order of Aviz]] and the [[Order of Santiago]] conferred as a single Lion]]<ref>{{cite web| url=http://old.hrad.cz/kpr/rady/rbl_lide_uk.html| title=The Prague Castle > Office of the Czech President > State Decorations > Order of the White Lion > List| publisher=Office of the President| accessdate=31 October 2008}}</ref> ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of titles and honours of Queen Elizabeth II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of Christ. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Order of Distinction (Belize), JWULTRABLIZZARD!

Wikipedia editor Upjav just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your article looks a bit like a dictionary definition, which we should try to avoid (WP:NAD), but other than that, your article has been approved. Thank you for your contribution.

To reply, leave a comment on Upjav's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Order of the Buffalo Hunt, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mhs.mb.ca/docs/people/orderofbuffalohunt.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of personal coats of arms of Governors-General of Ghana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and not enough text to keep.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 23:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Order of the Equatorial Star, JWULTRABLIZZARD!

Wikipedia editor Bfpage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

nice start on the article. you have so much experience in editing I am pretty sure you will be adding references very shortly

To reply, leave a comment on Bfpage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Napoleon may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{s-ttl|title=President of the Italian Republic|years=11 November – 12 December 1802|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Order of Australia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:Coat of Arms of Ninian Martin Stephen.svg|thumb|The neck badge of a Knight of the Order of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orders and decorations of the Commonwealth realms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of National Hero. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Royal Family Order of King Olav V of Norway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sports Devotee (talk) 10:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Royal Family Order of King Olav V of Norway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sports Devotee (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JWULTRABLIZZARD, this is a dead link. Do you have any other references to support this article? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I was curious about this one as well, since it does not translate to anything I've heard of. Poking around I found no:Kong Olav Vs portrettnål (lit. 'Portrait needle of King Olav V'); it may or may not be a match, the colour description is the same:

enwiki: "Order was Red, bordered white with a blue fimbriation along the white border."

nowiki: "red with narrow stripes in white, blue and white at the edges." (trans.)

Sources are hard to find if you search for both terms. Comments, JWULTRABLIZZARD? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 20:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First; it's not a dead link:

http://orderofsplendor.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/royal-splendor-101-royal-family-orders.html. JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly; the ribbon; as seen as a service ribbon and on the Royal Family Order of King Haakon VII to the far right:

Curiously is the same for all three Norwegian Royal Family Orders, (as well as the Order of St. Olav, and the St.Olavs Medal which are entirely separate awards); in this picture of Princess Ragnhild, Mrs Lorentzen; on the bottom right; the late sister of the Present King, she is shown wearing the Royal Family Order of her father, King Olav V, with the same ribbon as used on the Order of her grandfather, King Haakon VII:

-And is absolutely red, with a white border, with a blue fimbriation, as stated in the article. Or to use layman's terms, a blue stripe.

Comments, everyone?JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For a couple of people who seemed very keen on having this page deleted a few days ago; you seem to have very little to say on the subject now. Comments would be appreciated.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 12:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my original edit on Ten Days' Campaign to change "William of Orange" to "William, Prince of Orange". I agree there is a certain confusion over the Dutch penchant for naming their monarchs exactly the same thing, but when you say "Unless one clicks on the link, 'William of Orange' could refer to William the Silent, any of the Stadtholders of the Netherlands called 'William' as well as any of the subsequent heirs-apparent to the Dutch throne" I am afraid I disagree. William of Orange is exactly the same as "William, Prince of Orange" as you will see if you look at the full titles of William the Silent, William II, Prince of Orange etc. There certainly is confusion (as you mentioned), but this is not avoided by adding an extra word. Indeed, the only difference is that "William of Orange" fits, conveniently, on one line of the infobox... —Brigade Piron (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National emblem of France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gavril Krastevich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kotel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please add your source.Xx236 (talk) 08:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mess dress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Life Guards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mess dress, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Parachute Regiment and Royal Irish Regiment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coats of arms of Elizabeth II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coats of arms of Elizabeth II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Re5x (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uniforms of the Royal Marines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MTP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Nikolaiho. JWULTRABLIZZARD, thanks for creating List of Personal Coats of Arms of the Presidents of Chile!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please added references to your article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

NikolaiHo^☎️ 02:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uniforms of the British Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parachute Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uniforms of the Royal Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Order of Lignum Vitae, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Order of Distinction (Bahamas), JWULTRABLIZZARD!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi. Thanks for creating the stub articles. Could you please take a little time to format the citations, add a reflist, and categorize them?

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Petchey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Navy ranks, rates, and uniforms of the 18th and 19th centuries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Master (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article, Arnau Roger de Pallars, created on 15 November 2013, does not have enough content, sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more content and citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved this article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the title) where you can incubate the draft article with minimal disruption. When you feel this draft article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeHebda (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article, Joaquín de Santiyán y Valdivielso, created on 15 November 2013‎, does not have enough content, sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more content and citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved this article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the title) where you can incubate the draft article with minimal disruption. When you feel this draft article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeHebda (talk) 12:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uniforms of the British Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joaquín de Santiyán y Valdivielso, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arnau Roger de Pallars, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JWULTRABLIZZARD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arnau Roger de Pallars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Haiti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only three of these men have coats of arms, and none later than 1849, so I doubt any more will arise. The one for Henri Christophe looks like it was the coat of arms for the whole kingdom rather than Christophe's personal arms; ditto for Faustin Soulouque. That leaves Jean-Louis Pierrot's (very cool) coat of arms as the only personal one on this list, which means it falls quite short of out guideline for stand-alone lists.

While I appreciate that the page has long been deleted, it's perhaps worth pointing out that in a monarchy, there is a convention that the arms of state (or 'arms of Dominion') are one and the same, i.e. they do not have 'personal arms' as such, and any arms they did bear prior to their accession as monarch cease to be used in favour of the arms of dominion instead.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 17:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joaquín de Santiyán y Valdivielso, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JWULTRABLIZZARD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joaquín de Santiyán y Valdivielso".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:57, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banner of arms, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lincoln, Durham and Angus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of coats of arms of governors-general of Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N and some other guidelines and policies, like being a trivial intersection of characteristics, and a gallery. People have a personal (or family) coat of arms, and are governor-general: neither has a bearing on the other, the combination doesn't provide any additional information or insight.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Armorial of Governors-General of Ceylon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N and some other guidelines and policies, like being a trivial intersection of characteristics, and a gallery. People have a personal (or family) coat of arms, and are governor-general: neither has a bearing on the other, the combination doesn't provide any additional information or insight.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorial of Presidents of Finland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of Presidents of Finland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Iceland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Iceland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorial of Presidents of Austria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of Presidents of Austria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorial of Presidents of Chile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of Presidents of Chile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorial of Governors-General and Presidents of South Africa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of Governors-General and Presidents of South Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorial of presidents of Germany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of presidents of Germany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armorial of presidents of France is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorial of presidents of France until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Poland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of personal coats of arms of Presidents of Poland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bialystok District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Cross of the Seven Arms. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello; there are several sources that I put at the bottom and hyperlinked to? They're from the Andorra Gazette (the official gazette of the government of Andorra), regarding the creation and awarding of the order, and you can read them (in Catalan), if you click on them, so I'm not quite sure why you're asking "where's the sources"-they're the same sources as used on the equivalent page on the Cataln wikipedia.

Regards, JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]