User talk:Kwamikagami

Word/quotation of the moment:

Astrology has no effect on reality, so why should reality have any effect on astrology? – J.S. Stenzel, commenting on astrological planets that astrologers acknowledge don't really exist

(Previous quotes)

Do you think the liberals are using these school shootings to further their anti-tragedy agenda? — Col. Erran Morad, Who Is America?, s01e01 yod-dropper — (when you need something that sounds like an insult)[1] ALL keys matter — response to the scale-wandering rendition of the national anthem at CPAC 2021 The Lunatic-in-Charge becomes the Lunatic-at-Large Lame duck à l'orange (AKA canard à l'orange) It is a mortifying circumstance, which greatly perplexes many a painstaking philosopher, that nature often refuses to second his most profound and elaborate efforts; so that often after having invented one of the most ingenious and natural theories imaginable, she will have the perverseness to act directly in the teeth of his system, and flatly contradict his most favorite positions. This is a manifest and unmerited grievance, since it throws the censure of the vulgar and unlearned entirely upon the philosopher; whereas the fault is not to be ascribed to his theory, which is unquestionably correct, but to the waywardness of Dame Nature, who, with the proverbial fickleness of her sex, is continually indulging in coquetries and caprices, and seems really to take pleasure in violating all philosophic rules, and jilting the most learned and indefatigable of her adorers. [...] The philosophers took this in very ill part, and it is thought they would never have pardoned the slight and affront which they conceived put upon them by the world had not a good-natured professor kindly officiated as a mediator between the parties, and effected a reconciliation. Finding the world would not accommodate itself to the theory, he wisely determined to accommodate the theory to the world. — Washington Irving, Knickerbocker's History of New York Pela primeira vez na sua vida a morte soube o que era ter um cão no regaço. For the first time in her life, death knew what it felt like to have a dog in her lap. — José Saramago, Death with Interruptions / Death at Intervals It is now generally accepted that the megaliths that make up Stonehenge were moved by human effort. — as opposed to by what? Anybody who says you only have yourself to blame is just not very good at blaming other people. — It's Happy Bunny When poppies pull themselves up from their roots and start out, one after the other, toward the sunset – don't follow them. — Slavko Janevski, 'Silence' And the dough-headed took their acid fermentation for a soul, the stabbing of meat for history, the means of postponing their decay for civilization. — Stanislaw Lem, Return from the Stars The Church says that the Earth is Flat, but I know that it is Round, for I have seen its Shadow on the Moon, and I have more Faith in a Shadow than in the Church. — (commonly misattributed to Magellan) In the early years of the study there were more than 200 speakers of the dialect, including one parrot. — from the WP article Nancy Dorian Mikebrown is unusually eccentric and not very bright. [...] Astronomers have not noticed any outbursts by Mikebrown. — from the WP article 11714 Mikebrown Ecce Mono Keep Redskins White! "homosapiens are people, too!!" a sprig of spaghetti "I've always had a horror of husbands-in-law." awkwardnessful anti–zombie-fungus fungus "Only an evil person would eat baby soup." (said in all sincerity)

Your continuous removal of Bono from Twi is just mere act of confusion. You claim Twi is synonymous to Akan yet removing Akan dialect of Bono from the article. You claim Twi is a common name for Asante and Akuapem, yet at the same time subsumes dialects of Ahafo, Akuapem, Akyem, Asante, Asen, Dankyira and Kwawu. All these amounts to your confusion of not knowing what Twi is wholly. In what bases did you come into conclusion that Twi is not language yet synonymous to Akan? FYI, Twi consists of dialects of Akwamu, Bono, Asante, Akuapem, Denkyira, Akyem etc Bosomba Amosah (talk) 20:04, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used your own sources. If you don't understand your sources, perhaps you should edit a different topic. — kwami (talk) 11:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of my sources said Bono is not Twi. Perhaps you are making your own assumptions on the table explaining Proto Tano languages Bosomba Amosah (talk) 11:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you clearly don't understand your own sources, or the subject matter. You shouldn't edit areas where you're ignorant. — kwami (talk) 20:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you don’t have to remove information with RS. Akuapem and Asante became the first two major Twi to be developed into written forms, meaning there are other Twi as seen here [[2]]. However, Twi is more than that, Twi entails Akuapem, Bono, Akyem, Akwamu, Asante, Denkyira etc as seen here [[3]] Bosomba Amosah (talk) 09:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need WP:RELIABLE SOURCES for your edits. I don't know how you can still not understand that. — kwami (talk) 21:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you change East Cushitic languages back to a redirect page to Cushitic languages? I'm afraid I don't understand your comment "rd content mirror". As was now supported with references, East Cushitic is a commonly accepted separate subfamily. I could add more references, but it might be getting excessive. Benji man (talk) 04:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's because Cushitic languages has a more detailed discussion of East Cushitic subclassification, which was the main contents of East Cushitic languages so far. But East Cushitic needs its own page, it's strange that it's the only node in the tree that doesn't have one (e.g. Lowland East Cushitic, which is a more controversial subgroup). Would moving the detailed discussion to East Cushitic help? Benji man (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there was less info on East Cushitic in its own article than on the Cushitic article, so it was redundant.

The problem is that East Cushitic is itself somewhat controversial, so I'm not sure it would be a good idea to move the content over. But maybe it's become better accepted recently. Certainly if it's uncontroversial now, the classification etc would be better there, as you propose. — kwami (talk) 09:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'll move it over, thanks for your understanding! Benji man (talk) 14:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gǃo'e ǃHu.ogg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 22:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edits on Bono dialect saying “Dolphyne does not say Bono and Fante are mutually intelligible”. This is incorrect and misinformation as Dolphyne always saids Bono is mutually intelligible with other Akan dialects of Akuapem, Asante, Akyem, Fante etc as seen here (p.88)[[4]]. Check and verify before I go on to my edits Bosomba Amosah (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's why it's helpful to provide a full reference for your claims.

The Bono article as currently written reflects Dolphyne. I did now change it from a 'dialect' to 'dialect cluster', as Dolphyne says that Bono is not a single dialect. — kwami (talk) 21:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bono is a dialect not a dialect cluster. Dolphyne conducted the based on grouped towns because of proximity to each other. That doesn’t make it a dialect cluster. This is also the same for all the Akan dialects. For instance, in Fante dialects, Gomoa, Ekumfi, Breman etc varies yet a unified orthography has been chosen. Page 88 saids it is dialect; her research on Akan languages also say it is a dialect. Bosomba Amosah (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you merged the Pakawara language with the Chakobo language article. I wanted to ask, are they the same language? If so, should the merged article not have the name Chakobo-Pakawara language? Thank you in advance. Ruditaly (Talk) 20:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. According to Fleck 2013, they're dialects of a single language. — kwami (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]