User talk:Me Da Wikipedian

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rocket Lab you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Schwede66 -- Schwede66 (talk) 21:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. @Schwede66 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right. By now, I've dealt with the first of the five GA criteria. There's a lot of work for you to do. The volume is high, but the various tasks probably won't take very long. The exception is the lead, where I suggest you nuke it and start from scratch. I just wanted to check in with you that you are ok, and don't feel overwhelmed by this all? I'm not sure whether you've gone through a GA process before. You've certainly picked a meaty subject! Schwede66 01:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never done a GA before. Not sure how quickly I'll be able to get through all of that but clearly I made a whole lot of mistakes...you're very quick at this.@Schwede66 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE UnapologeticSloth (talk) 22:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@UnapologeticSloth What are you talking about? That userbox doesn't exist! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blank Userbox :p

Sorry for the long delay, but you didn't complete the CVUA training course. You only have to put up diffs in the appropriate space. I will evaluate it in the next 48 hours, so that you can graduate CVUA.

You have seriously improved since your last block, including an impending good article nomination above. Keep it up! ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ToadetteEdit I don't have the 50 reverts in the past 2 weeks though. I'm much less active here than I used to be, but I'll get around to actually reverting stuff either later today or sometime next week. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rocket Lab you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rocket Lab for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Schwede66 -- Schwede66 (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The account Lowe Lilliehorn who is reverting edits on Brandbergs article is the name of Brandbergs party’s press secretary. So I believe the editor is likely getting paid to revert edits.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]