User talk:PresN/Archive 8

This is an archive of past discussions with User:PresN. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 15

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The article Garry Schyman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Garry Schyman for eventual comments about the article. Well done! S Masters (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

May I be the first to congratulate you for your work on Music of the Xenosaga series! I admire the way you single-handedly wrote a GA class article. I enjoyed reviewing it (and am now considering buying the game once I'm done with FFXIII). Hats off to you! Cheers! --Tea with toast (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you created {{VGseriestitle}}. If you like, I believe I can tweak {{VGtitle}} to do the same thing. Are the only differences the absence of the release dates under the title and the addition of the word "series" after the title? I think one new parameter can accomplish this. How about "|series = yes"? (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC))

Ok. I think it's working as intended. Let me know how it looks. If everything is good, I'll update the documentation and redirect the series template to this one. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 19:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC))

Everything should be updated. Let me know if I missed anything or glitches turn up. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC))

Round two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to Hunter Kahn (submissions), our clear overall round winner, and to ThinkBlue (submissions) and Arsenikk (submissions), who were solidly second and third respectively. There were a good number of high scorers this round- competition was certainly tough! Round three begins tomorrow, but anything promoted after the end of round two is eligible for points. 16 contestants (eight pool leaders and eight wildcards) will progress to round four in two months- things are really starting to get competitive. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants Stone (submissions) and White Shadows (submissions) for their help in preparing for round three. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 17:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank for correcting my revert on FF:VI. The "video" part of the title didn't quite register and the "pen and paper" phrase jumped out at me when I skimmed the popup preview. —Ost (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for correcting my edits. "Role-playing video game" works wonders; I should've thought of that.–FunkyVoltron ^talk 18:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me, Pres. I'm having citation problems in Jesus Walks as they are dead and I am wondering if you can find archive links to the links and give them to me. link. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I have another Jesus Walks question. Can you make a file of a sample of the song? GamerPro64 (talk) 21:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Congradulations on the Hugo Awards page making FL status. However, I mentioned on the talk page that the title column doesn't sort correctly. Can you fix this? Jimknut (talk) 15:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is Sasata (submissions), who has 570 points. He leads pool C. Pools A, B and D are led by Hunter Kahn (submissions), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) and White Shadows (submissions) respectively. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Two of last year's final 8, Theleftorium (submissions) and Scorpion0422 (submissions), have dropped out of the competition, saying they would rather their place went to someone who will have more time on their hands than them next round. On a related note, a special thank you goes to White Shadows (submissions) for his help behind the scenes once again. There is currently a problem with the poster, perhaps caused by the new skin- take a look at this discussion and see if you can help. The competition has continued to tick over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. Good luck to all! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 20:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi PresN, if I was you I would just copy paste an article from your sandbox instead of moving it out - will leave you without having to making explaining comments and you will be attributed all the same (and no one wants to read the sandbox edits in the article history, since you used the box as an article incubator). Best Hekerui (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

...see here. Hope that's okay! rst20xx (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 23:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you haven't voted yet. Vote for the one you like the most - more participants make a better result :) Hekerui (talk) 12:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

On June 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Music of Final Fantasy XIII, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 06:02, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Howdy! When you removed the prod for Warren Lapine, you mentioned that a magazine he edited had been nominated for a writing award. I wonder, does that qualify him as notable? I would buy that the magazine could be notable under those circumstances, but I'm not sure about the editor. I can always AFD it if I feel strong enough, I suppose, just trying to get a sanity check. Thanks! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:12, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

'ello? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The article Music of Final Fantasy XIII you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are many changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within one weeks, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 18:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The article Music of Final Fantasy XIII you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Music of Final Fantasy XIII for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 03:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SuperSpaceInvadersCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. I've been improving the Mega Man (Rockman) articles these past few months and have discussed with WP:VG an idea for a Music of the Mega Man series article that encompasses a discography for the entire franchise. Seeing as how many of your music articles have gained Good Article status, I was wondering if you might have some extra time to help me with this task. It will be a rather large undertaking, as there have been dozens of CDs released in the past twenty years or so. It may even require more than one article considering there are multiple subseries (Mega Man X, Mega Man Legends, Mega Man Zero, etc.). Just let me know if you're interested. Cheers. ~ Hibana (talk) 15:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were Ian Rose (submissions) (A), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (B, and the round's overall leader), ThinkBlue (submissions) (C) Casliber (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions) (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to Stone (submissions) for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17

An editor has nominated Zettai Zetsumei: Dencharasuji Sansugoroku, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zettai Zetsumei: Dencharasuji Sansugoroku and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Bxj (talk) 00:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:HugoAwardLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I wonder if you could spare time to take a look at this article, which is somewhat stalled at FAC. A few comments would be helpful, to get discussion going again. Brianboulton (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for working on this - hadn't seen that we list these before. I just read "Exhalation" and it was really good! Regards Hekerui (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

1. Since Civilization 5 is yet to be released and Alpha Centauri is 11 years old, I believe it is proper to consider SMAC to be a sequel to Civilization, not the Civilization series, which are remakes, with the game ending in 2100, which is where SMAC starts. Besides, the source states that SMAC is a sequel to Civilization, not the Civilization series. I am going to change this, since I think it is more accurate to say SMAC is the sequel to Civilization (which suggest that the game picks up where Civilization ends) rather than the sequel to the Civilization series (which might suggest that it was made after those games). If you disagree, start a new section on the article's talk page.
2. It looks odd to have a combination of italics and non itallics, e.g. Civilization II's. Could you show me in the MoS where this usage is suggested? I'll leave it for now.
3. You are correct that the names of games should be italicized. I checked the MoS. Thank you.

I am making this comment on your talk page because I appreciate your effort in going through the article and making those changes. At this moment, I am going through sources, so there will be rough edges, particularly in the Development section. I hope you will continue to watch and edit the article. Vyeh (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I went to the WikiProject Video Game page, and looked at a FA, Age of Empires, and saw the same construction of an italicized game name followed by a non-italicized "s." I'll think some more about whether SMAC is a sequel to Civilization or the Civilization series. (Note that the link is to Civilization (series).) Maybe you're right. My concern is to grab the reader's attention in the lead and lay out the major points and part of my concern is making each word count. Thanks for the compliment about the job. Vyeh (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

I restored SMAC being a sequel to the Civilization series. I think it captures the intent of the source (who said Civilization even though he discussed Civilization II later in the article). Once again, thank you for your interest. I think I have gotten most of the sources pertaining to development and I am thinking of reorganizing development from a chronological story into a thematic one. Vyeh (talk) 16:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by Sasata (submissions) has ended up the more competitive, with three contestants ( Sasata (submissions), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions)) scoring over 500 points already. Pool B is led by Casliber (submissions), who has also scored well over 500. The top two from each pool, as well as the next four highest scorers regardless of pool, will make it through to our final eight. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.

Earlier this round, we said goodbye to Hunter Kahn (submissions), who has bowed out to spend more time on the book he is authoring with his wife. We wish him all the best. In other news, the start of this round also saw some WikiCup awards sent out by Suomi Finland 2009 (submissions). We appreciate his enthusiasm, and contestants are of course welcome to award each other prizes as they see fit, but rest assured that we will be sending out "official" awards at the end of the competition. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 22:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, just making sure you're aware of this comment. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey. I saw you removed the picture of Mitsuda from several articles due to it not being free to use. If that's true, then there's a larger issue, as the file is up on Commons and it should be marked there as not free. It's also being used on a lot of other Wikis; the user Procyon-studio (talk · contribs) went and added it all over the place. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to say good work on all your FF and FF music articles. FF6 (or 3) is my favorite, and I've been thinking about buying the soundtrack on iTunes, and I think after looking over the article and your pages, I'll do it tonight, and I am also going to look into some of the other non-computer generated versions. QFL 24-7 ^{bla ¤ cntrb ¤ kids ¤ pics ¤ vids} 20:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC) P.S. See you in Austin, Sept 25th... going to the UCLA game? I am...

See Wikipedia:Autopatrolled, this won't do anything for you, but the log entry will show up in your watchlist, so I wanted to leave an explanation. Bottom line, I've watched enough of your FLCs go through to know you don't need new page patrol watching over you. There's no new buttons, the flag only affects Special:NewPages. Happy editing, and if you'd like the WP:ROLLBACK flag, just let me know. Courcelles 20:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I was wondering if you had the time to drop by Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Killer7/archive2. It's been a few days without comments so maybe you could help kick start discussion again. Thanks, Axem Titanium (talk) 04:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

We have our final eight! The best of luck to those who remain. A bumper newsletter this week as we start our home straight.

• Pool A's winner was Sturmvogel_66 (submissions). Awarded the top score overall this round, Sturmvogel_66 writes primarily on military history, favouring Naval warfare.
• Pool B's winner was Casliber (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured articles this round, Casliber writes primarily on natural sciences, especially botany and ornithology.
• Pool A's close second was Sasata (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured pictures this round, Sasata writes primarily on natural sciences, favouring mycology.
• Pool B's close second was ThinkBlue (submissions). Awarded the top score for good articles and topics this round, ThinkBlue primarily writes content related to television and film, including 30 Rock.
• The first wildcard was TonyTheTiger (submissions). Awarded the top score for did you knows and valued pictures this round, TonyTheTiger writes on a number of topics, including baseball, American football and Chicago.
• The second wildcard was White Shadows (submissions). Someone who has helped the Cup behind the scenes all year, White Shadows said "I'm still in shock that I made it this far" and writes primarily on Naval warfare, especially U-boats.
• The third wildcard was Staxringold (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured lists and topics this round, Staxringold primarily writes on sport and television, including baseball and 30 Rock.
• The fourth wildcard was William S. Saturn (submissions). Entering the final eight only on the final day of the round, William S. Saturn writes on a number of topics, mostly related to Texas.

We say goodbye to the six who fell at the final hurdle. Geschichte (submissions) only just missed out on a place in the final eight. Resolute (submissions) was not far behind. Candlewicke (submissions) was awarded top points for in the news this round. Gary King (submissions) contributed a variety of did you know articles. Suomi Finland 2009 (submissions) said "I'm surprised to have survived so far into the competition", but was extactic to see Finland in the semi-finals. Arsenikk (submissions) did not score this round, but has scored highly in previous rounds. We also say goodbye to Ian Rose (submissions), who withdrew earlier this month after spending six weeks overseas. Anyone interested in this round's results can see them here and here. Thank you to Stone (submissions) for these.

Signups for next year's competition are now open. Planning is ongoing, with a key discussion about judges for next year open. Discussion about how next year's scoring will work is ongoing, and thoughts are more than welcome at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. Also, TonyTheTiger is compiling some information and statistics on the finalists here- the final eight are encouraged to add themselves to the list.

Our final eight will play it out for two months, after which we will know 2010's WikiCup winner, and a variety of prizes will be awarded. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 23:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

You've got more images to play with - commons:Category:Aquaria (video game). You might want to edit the image descriptions on the Commons images, being more familiar with the game. - hahnchen 18:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey, well done on featured. Alec has released the trailer music under a free license too. I think it would be useful in the article, but I'll leave placement to you. - hahnchen 18:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your support last time around. I re-nominated so hopefully things will turn out a bit better this time. I'd really appreciate any additional comments you can give. Thanks, Axem Titanium (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight. TonyTheTiger (submissions) leads at the time of writing with 1180 points, immediately followed by Sasata (submissions) with 1175 points. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) closely follows in third place with 1100 points. For those who are interested, data about the finalists has been compiled at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/finalists, while a list of content submitted by all WikiCup contestants prior to this round has been compiled at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Submissions. As ever, anything contestants worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open. Signups for next year's competition are more than welcome, and suggestions for how next year's competition will work are appreciated at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. More general comments and discussions should be directed at the WikiCup talk page. One month remains in the 2010 WikiCup, after which we will know our champion. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 23:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking about replacing File:WonderBoyCover.jpg (which you uploaded) with the arcade flyer (first choice, but low-quality) or with one of the computer game covers; as listed at Talk:Wonder Boy in Monster Land#Considering changing infobox cover. I was wondering what you think about that. –MuZemike 19:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi PresN,

The Signpost's "Features and admins" page now includes a "Choice of the week" for featured articles, featured lists and featured pictures. Each week, The Signpost invites a different delegate, reviewer or nominator from each process to select what they think is the best, or their favourite, item, and to give their reasons. These reasons can be technical (e.g., related to the Criteria) or subjective, or both.

Would you be willing to do this with featured lists for next week's edition? If you agree, promotions from Saturday 9 October to Friday 15 October will be eligible, as well as three FLs promoted last week. They will be listed here by Saturday UTC, and we would need your text by Sunday UTC. Examples from previous weeks are accessible by clicking on "← PREVIOUS Features and admins" at the bottom. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! It's ready for you. Don't forget that you can choose an FL that was either promoted this past week or one of the three that was promoted the week before. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 13:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

And what an excellent choice you made – well, I would say that, wouldn't I? Many thanks. Bencherlite^Talk 10:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I was wondering on how to use the navbox that the Final fantasy template series has. You see there are a large number of other templates that look really long for series similar to final fantasy's structure, so i attempted it on the template:Universal Century but the group and list didn't seem to add in. Do you know what i did wrong?Bread Ninja (talk) 10:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to TonyTheTiger (submissions), with 2260, and third to Casliber (submissions), with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists – White Shadows (submissions), William S. Saturn (submissions), Staxringold (submissions) and ThinkBlue (submissions). Also, congratulations to Sasata (submissions), who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is Casliber (submissions), for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is Staxringold (submissions), for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is Jujutacular (submissions), for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is TonyTheTiger (submissions), for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is Candlewicke (submissions), for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the WikiCup talk page and on the scoring talk page. Also, people are more than welcome to sign up for next year's competition on the signup page. Well done and thank you to everyone involved – the Cup has been a pleasure to run, and we, as judges, have been proud to be a part of it. We hope that next year, however the Cup is working, and whoever is running it, it will be back, stronger and more popular than ever. Until then, goodbye and happy editing! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 03:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

		The WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation
		Awarded to PresN, for participation in the 2010 WikiCup. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

As a regular at FLC, I'd like to draw your attention to ongoing discussion here about changes to the format of tables which will affect all existing FLs and all current and future FLCs. Your input would be welcome. Thanks for your contributions so far! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm currently reviewing Music of the Front Mission series. You can find the review at Talk:Music of the Front Mission series/GA1.--Teancum (talk) 20:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

As someone with extensive content experience, would you be interested in becoming an Administrator? Honestly, we need more people with the tools, and many of the current candidates at RfA are either inexperienced and/or just not ready to judge consensus. Being an administrator is obviously not an obligation, though it certainly would help to fight vandalism and clear out deletion backlogs every now and then (like I try to do).

The situation at RfA is pretty dire, and I think we need to go out and pick qualified users to receive the tools. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 02:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Great—I'll get my nomination ready tomorrow after work. I'm excited; we could always use more content-focused users with the tools! —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The only thing that might get you in trouble are the lack of edit summaries—some editors are pretty big on that, but I think I can explain and offer examples of you using the edit summary function when necessary. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Here's pretty much the laundry list: Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. Most of it you obviously know through your time editing articles, participating in consensus-building discussion, patrolling VG articles for deletion, and reverting random vandalism over the years. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

• Oh yeah, here's an example of one of my previous noms: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Darthgriz98. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Some users may need further evidence of AfD and vandal fighting participation before becoming comfortable with granting the tools. I mean, even though you've been here more than 4 years, are civil, have demonstrated ability to perform tedious tasks, participate in consensus building, and so forth, there will always be users who want to see the direct, hands-on experience. I can try to explain all this in the nomination, as well as the edit summary point, but would you be comfortable waiting for a month or two and maybe building some edit history demonstrating your Wikipedia knowledge as it applies to AfDs and vandals and stuff? Or would you rather just dive in and focus on offering the best answers to the questions you can? —Deckiller (t-c-l) 05:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PresN. User:David Fuchs is gonna co-nom. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 23:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Alright, it's up. You can probably go ahead and add user tags about being nominated. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

I see you're into playing video games. What are your favorite games? –BuickCenturyDriver 10:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again for doing the links check for Petrified Forest National Park, which became a featured article today. Finetooth (talk) 04:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Looks like your RfA is pending closure. At 88 percent, it will most likely be considered a pass. Congrats in advance! —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Seconded. Congrats! Sven Manguard _Talk 04:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I've closed your your RFA as successful. I'm sure you've reviewed the comments and will be mindful of them while stepping into your new role. Feel free to drop by with any questions. Congrats =] –xeno^talk 05:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Congrats! Don't let power inflate your ego too soon, plenty of time for that :) Good luck, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 05:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Congrats! - I know I !voted oppose, but I'm sure you realise that this was on a matter of Wikipedia principle and not meant personally in any way, as I always had every confidence that your RfA would pass and that you will wield the mop bravely and judiciously :)--Kudpung (talk) 06:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Congratualtions are you successful nomonation. You can use the {{sysop}} tag to link admin logs and to your nomination.

PresN (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA).

By the way, I like video games, too. My favourites are Zelda and Mario games, which are you favourites? –BuickCenturyDriver 11:46, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

• Congrats :) You can copy scripts on my page that are pretty helpful for admin use. Best Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 13:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Congratulations PresN! Regards, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 1:44pm • 02:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm letting you know that I removed the article (I can't show it because I'm on my Android) because it doesn't have a WP:VG tag on its talk page. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, could you check what I've written and edit if necessary? Tony (talk) 11:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey Pres. Not trying to rush you or anything, but when are you making Music of Final Fantasy XIV? Its currently on Future Retention Periods at Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:43, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

As someone who commented on the previous FAC, perhaps you'd be interested in taking a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/.hack (video game series)/archive2? Thank you in advance, Axem Titanium (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi PresN, can you revisit the above FLC when you get the chance? The list appears to have received a copy-edit. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that was a hard one. Really taught me what it feels like to pull an entire article together yourself, I guess, and how it is to totally research it as well. JimmyBlackwing and I are hammering away at Anachronox (when we can catch free time, that is). The reception section is already a beast, and the development section will be too. Can't wait to storm the halls of Wikipedia with a killer, fantastically-sourced real-world perspective VG article like that. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 06:14, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey PresN. Seeing as you've been one of the people who's really led the multipliers discussion, could you take a look at this? It's perhaps not as revolutionary as it could have been, but it seems, to me, to be a fair conclusion. J Milburn (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)