User talk:R.Schuster/Archives/2010
This is an archive of past discussions with User:R.Schuster. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Photo Gallery at Jet Airways
Dear R.Schuster, you have recently removed a photo gallery I added at the article Jet Airways. The photos of that gallery were already there in the page, those I accumulated and gave the form of a gallery. Upon your deletion of the gallery, contributions by various Wikipedians have been disappeared too. What do you suggest over this? Should we put the gallery back? Or just track the previously added images and put them in appropriate sections of the article? --M. Tawsif Salam 08:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hello M. Tawsif Salam, well, I would leave the gallery outside because of:
- The <gallery> is not supposed to be a loose collection of pictures, it should “illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images”, see Wikipedia:Image use policy#Image galleries.
- The pictures are not lost, in no way, all these pictures, and even more, can be found where they are supposed to be, namely at commons.
- I moved this link now to first position in Jet Airways#External links, as it was a little bit hidden. Best regards, --R.Schuster (talk) 09:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Bitte
Schuster, please chuck it, as you discomfit me. I was handsomely build up the english and german article, the Lord's prayer is exemplification in the german article. And the Mura is the river of Prekmurje, accordingly just the apply of the prekmurian name. Doncsecztalk 15:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Schuster! The 41 other dialects of the Slovene language is not separate dialects the Slovene, as want to standard language and literature. Doncsecztalk 15:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- One more revert and we meet at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. --R.Schuster (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- I declined your report there, as this isn't simple vandalism. I suggest you file a report at WP:AN3, which will allow more thorough examination of the situation. Peter 19:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Peter! --R.Schuster (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Report filed. --R.Schuster (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- I declined your report there, as this isn't simple vandalism. I suggest you file a report at WP:AN3, which will allow more thorough examination of the situation. Peter 19:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Geitost was herald the fake information of Tübingen University. This information is muty and false, as István Küzmics not 1799 dead and the prekmurian standard language up 1945 was in use. Doncsecztalk 16:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Šujster! Here is few south Slavic dialects!!!! Banat Bulgarian, Torlakian, and others!!!! 17:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Doncsecz. You don't need to indoctrinate or convince me. I personally don't care about the Prekmurian dialect, but I care for the articles you deform. What you do is called original research and this is against wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information. Please get firm with the Wikipedia:Five pillars before you continue your disruptive edits. Danke. --R.Schuster (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Schuster, you learn the slovene and hungarian, and read the works of Marko Jesenšek, Ágoston Pável, Vilko Novak, Franci Just and others. If Novak now live (but dead in 2003) be shocked at his assertions. Doncsecztalk 07:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- You still don't get the point: I don't give a damn or two onto your yugoslavian dialect, I care for the wikipedia guidelines only. And as long as this guidelines are in place, and as long as you violate them, I will continue to fight against your fake entries. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia and not a place for self-expression of irrelevant dialects. --R.Schuster (talk) 07:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
You be incapable to accept, that this is the justice?! I'am slavistic undergard in Szombathely University and my thesis-theme the prekmurian standard language. The wikipedia quidelines the appellation of the sources and i have good and actual sources. You not Slovene, not linguistic, you reverse the work of Vilko Novak, what 60 years!!! Doncsecztalk 08:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- The Slovene linguistic also appreciate the Resian and Prekmurian language, and you tell: racially low dialect. Doncsecztalk 08:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
So much invidious man you, why make nothing of that the prekmurian dialect not casual speech?! This not his austrian dialect, the asutrian have your literature? Doncsecztalk 08:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
You was wrote thesis-theme in University?! I was make census of the sources. Ca. 40-50 published books, dissertations, essay, harangue is my sources! Doncsecztalk 10:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Du hasst die Slowenen? Du bist nicht Sprachforscher, und schreibst und sagst dummes Zeugen, suchst blöden Leksikonen. Warum deine muttersprache ist Österreichisch? Es ist sprache und der Prekmurisch nicht?! Doncsecztalk 19:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, why are you deleting a completely valid Online Swahili - English Dictionary link from the Swahili page? The link in question is to the second-largest online Swahili - English Dictionary, by far the best quality one by a huge margin, and it is completely free to use online for users and hence non-commercial. I am trying hard to assume good faith here, please help me, but there is absolutely no valid reason to delete this link. I can only assume that you saw the 'buy now' link for the DOWNLOADABLE version and MISTAKENLY assumed it was a commercial site --- but if that's the case, then you must LOOK HARDER before mistakenly and carelessly deleting random valid links. 17 June 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.178.5 (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Kisumu
I saw that you contributed to the external links in Kisumu, I was wondering whether we could work together to update the Kisumu page which currently reads like a travel brochure, which is very undeserving for a leading town in East Africa. If possible could you constructively help me make it better, I am hoping to get together a work group of contributers to help out so that it is something close to the Nairobi page. I will be working on this for the next week or two, if you have some spare time I will be glad if you could help me open up Kisumu to the world. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krator1 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Kenya.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Kenya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)