Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilawal Stadium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Nawabshah , which is the current target of the Benazirabad redirect, as a sensible ATD. Feel free to amend the target if the Nawabshah/Benazirabad title-war settles differently. Owen× ☎ 22:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bilawal Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Cricket. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per Nom. Could not find any sources providing any actual coverage let alone significant coverage on the subject. Fails WP:GNG. This is little more than a dictionary entry. All of the sources currently on the article are passing mention with the actual subject not being Bilawal Stadium. The fact that something exists does not mean it is notable. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Benazirabad as this venue is a prominent landmark in the city and is mentioned in the target page. Fails GNG and ORG and lacks standalone notability. Frank Anchor 13:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per my checking, I found no in-depth coverage from a single reliable secondary source. However, WP:GNG requires multiple independent reliable sources, so the article fails to meet WP:GNG. GrabUp - Talk 08:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.