Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of the Bangladesh Navy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Future of the Bangladesh Navy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A fictiois article. Doesnot have enough source to back up the future plans. It goes against WP:CBALL. SRS 00t@lk, 01:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Merge into Forces Goal 2030. Title seems out of place, relevant content there better suited in that overarching parent article. South Nashua (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment We just went through something very similar with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of the Bangladesh Air Force (2nd nomination)--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 23:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Forces Goal 2030 already has more information on the navy than this article. A redirect seems unnecessary. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - a redirect seems unnecessary and this doesn't really seem encyclopedic as currently construed. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom's point.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I disagree with the idea of redirecting because it's an implausible search term. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.