Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HansaWorld
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Woohookitty 07:42, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No relevancy established, seems to be just an ad, too little for even a stub, unwikified, ... Delete. S.K. 4 July 2005 15:25 (UTC)
- Delete Advertising Groeck 4 July 2005 16:06 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Why are we even wasting time on this obvious advertising/spam? RoySmith 4 July 2005 16:17 (UTC)
- Keep. I think the current article is an acceptable stub. They claim to have 300 employees and 64,000 customers. Notable enough, in my opinion. Sietse 4 July 2005 18:29 (UTC)
- weak Delete. IT companies grow on trees. I don't see what's so notable about this one. Fernando Rizo 4 July 2005 19:32 (UTC)
- Well, it does have 20000 Google hits, which approaches notability. Still, delete because the entry seems to exist to promote an external link as advertising. Xoloz 5 July 2005 04:53 (UTC)
- Delete, ad. If they're notable, I'll assume some third party will write about them. Radiant_>|< July 5, 2005 12:13 (UTC)
- Weak keep: Although it is very close to linkspamming, I believe their accounting software is widely used here in Sweden at least, but accounting software is not really a field I know very well. But if it is deleted, it should probably take its CEO, Karl Bohlin, with it. There was a late 19th/early 20th century Swedish astronomer named Karl Bohlin who probably deserves the article space better (the software guy may be his grandson or great grandson or something). Uppland 08:01, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.