Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DIN standards
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark 13:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of DIN standards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This is an enormous list of mainly red links with a blatant absence of notable content. Mausy5043 17:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO, The page is in violation of WP:NOT especially par. 1.7 and 1.8 Mausy5043 17:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not an encyclopedia article, might be appropriate for some kind of tech reference wiki. --Daniel J. Leivick 18:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, may not be relevant outside of Europe, but 'round here it is good to find it somewhere Alf photoman 20:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There is content, because many of he redlinks are described. Probably quite a few more of them could use an article. Thery're relevant in the US do, as they are often cross-refrenced.DGG 04:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There may be content but it is not notable Mausy5043 07:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral: DIN standards are very important, at least throughout the Central Europe, but given current structure of Wikipedia it will take years until it will be possible to maintain such detailed and specialized information here. Pavel Vozenilek 19:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, for now and hope that we are wrong with our assertion that it is a dead end due to maintenance problems AlfPhotoman 01:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with DIN, entries that are not redlinked. 70.55.84.248 09:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.