Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli Massacres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete A6 (Attack Page).

Someone's poorly spelled and unoriginal personal opinions at a title that's totally unsalvageable. Opabinia regalis 02:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Totally unsourced and POV. Strong delete, could even be speedied. -David Schaich 02:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment What is with the uptick in middle-east POV these days. Is this some kind of PR campaign? --Xrblsnggt 04:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I presume it's in large part an effect of recent news/tensions/military actions such as the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. -David Schaich 05:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete per David Schaich. There are articles covering the current conflict without nearly so much POV. -- H·G (^words/_works) 05:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, big time POV. Fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above. Medtopic 05:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Obviously anti-semetic hate mongering propaganda. Buckner 1986 16:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is scurrilous and libellous to assume that all opposition to Israel is anti-semitic. Piccadilly 17:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - please be very careful with words like libelous, and I don't mean your spelling. One of the easiest ways to earn a block is violating WP:NLT. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 02:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• It's unfortunately to keep seeing these types of unsourced and terribly PoV propaganda popping up on WP. "Wikipedia is not a soap-box" and all that. The topic of wholesale massacres is already covered by list of massacres, so my preference is delete. — RJH (talk) 18:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as extreme POV. Unfortunately, I can't find any wp:csd criteria that fit otherwise I would have speedied it. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note -- upon further consideration, I realize that CSD A6 applies. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as an embarrassment to WP. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 02:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. -- Jon513 23:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 05:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong speedy delete can't believe it's still here.--Kalsermar 16:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete attack page. Jon513 20:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Swift Delete this twisted piece of propaganda Nesher 20:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.