Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sendeanlage Bisamberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with no prejudice against merging by editorial process. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sendeanlage Bisamberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable (wave transmission facility); does not assert notability. Kironide (talk) 01:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Being a big pole stick out of the ground does not make you notable. Paragon12321 (talk) 01:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, -- for now at least; talking about notability is a little useless when as far as I know we don't have anything like notability standards or guidelines for things like transmission facilities. There are plenty of other articles about masts and towers, so a discussion of what counts as notable should be had calmly in context. From an engineering standpoint, they may well all be notable; and in the meantime, this seems like a perfectly good article. The German article seems to have a bit more information as well. -- phoebe / (talk) 07:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The article states that one of the masts is the tallest construction in Austria. That's certainly an assertion of notability.  RGTraynor  15:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to List of tallest structures in the world. A while back, there were a series of deletion discussions about various radio and television masts, with the ultimate decision to merge all the articles to List of masts, which was later merged into List of tallest structures in the world. B.Wind (talk) 02:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge Being the tallest construction in Austria is quite something, even though the article is pretty stubby and is likely to remain so for a while. – sgeureka ^t•c 10:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per B.Wind. --Julesn84 (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Sqeureka. Certainly the tallest construction in a country is notable. --Oakshade (talk) 16:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.