Talk:Ostpolitik

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cold War Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

So they exchanged ambassadors, so what. What did that accomplish? reduced trade barriers? vroman (talk) 04:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"the proverbial "Inspiration through Technology" principle." - this makes no sense in English, since "Inspiration through Technology" is not a "proverbial" phrase in that language. 86.149.132.157 (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the proper expression is Neue Ostpolitik, that what's all about: to have a Ostpolitik different to the previous one.--Ziko (talk) 23:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This subheading should really be its own page with a disambiguation link rather than included in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.53.198 (talk) 06:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be the target of East Germany–West Germany relations redirect? ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]