Talk:Praga E-55

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Czech Republic This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the aircraft project. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Military history: Aviation This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force

• ... that the Praga E-55 was abandoned due to the Czech aircraft industry being directed to concentrate on licensed production of Soviet aircraft?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/BLKBOK; Template:Did you know nominations/Aquilegia moorcroftiana

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

• The article looks good. QPQs done. The hook is interesting. The article matches the hook. I can't figure out if the image is freely licensed, but if you use the image there should be a "(pictured)" in the hook. ―Panamitsu (talk) 02:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not 100% sure on the picture, so removing it from the nom. Thanks! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The photo is present in the 1976 Letectví a Kosmonautika article p. 867 - photo credits (covering the whole L+K article) are: "J. Landa, K Masojidek, archiv J Zazvonila v VZLU". The photo dates to October 1951 or before, as that was when it was allocated a civil registration (it still has the military registration V-11 in the photo). Note that I didn't include the three-view diagram used on other language articles as it definitely has dubious licencing.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Bushranger: Isn't the typical layout of a 'References' section like this the reflist followed by a 'Bibliography' or 'Works cited' subheader followed by the works cited? TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 00:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't make the article, but I did format the section just now. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean to imply you had, sorry. I just saw your DYK, thought this might've been an intentional stylistic choice, and wanted to check before stepping on any toes. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]