User:JBW/PROD log

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

1. Fresh with Anna Olson: PROD 15:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to press releases.
2. Anna Olson: PROD; notified Fishhead2100 (talk · contribs) 15:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. References are pages not mentioning her, an archived page formerly on her own web site, dead links, a Wikipedia article, an advertising page, etc.
3. Triple XXX: PROD 15:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The references are pages on on the company's own web site, a dead link, and a page not mentioning Triple XXX.
4. Anil Ravipudi: PROD 14:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and no evidence of notability.
5. Michael Prince: PROD; notified Jessrae (talk · contribs) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. Currently the only reference is a dead link, which from its URL was not an independent source; earlier references, now removed, are either pages not mentioning him at all or dead links. The article was created by a single purpose account which also posted unambiguous promotion for Prince's company.
6. Samuel Sloan Colt I: PROD; notified Sloan.colt (talk · contribs) 15:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources neither confirm the content of the article nor establish notability under the terms of Wikipedia's guidelines. Other sources confirm his existence, but do not establish notability.
7. Cali The Producer: BLP PROD; notified Urbanbanga (talk · contribs) 21:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
8. Salman Ali Shaikh: PROD 20:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The references are all dead links, and online searches have failed to produce suitable sources.

1. Shim Kwang Ho: PROD 17:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources cited, and very little in independent sources found on searching.
2. SNL Financial: PROD 22:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: (1) Despite periodic attempts to de-spam the article, it has remained substantially an advertisement throughout its history. (2) There is no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines: references are largely sources which are not independent, or don't give substantial coverage, or both.
3. Visibility Scorecard: PROD 21:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article on a proprietary concept with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Created by a single purpose account that also created a promotional article, now deleted, on the company responsible for "Visibility Scorecard".)
4. James "Bobo" Fay: BLP PROD; notified Fluffuzz (talk · contribs) 13:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
5. Gary Cziko: PROD 15:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: Notability was questioned about a year and a half ago, and since then no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability has been produced. At most one of the references could possible be considered substantial of a book by Cziko (even that one not of Cziko per se).
6. Ruler (film): PROD; notified Prabhas Govardhan (talk · contribs) 12:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: Totally unsourced article on an "upcoming" film: no evidence whatever of notability.
7. Dabbu (Telugu Film): PROD 12:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: Totally unsourced article on an "upcoming" film: no evidence whatever of notability.
8. Natasha Halevi: PROD 13:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Cited sources mostly barely mention her, in some cases don't mention her at all, and many are not independent sources.
9. FeedWind: PROD; notified Geofrtilt (talk · contribs) 14:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. Sourced to blogs, a press release, non-independent sources.
10. Uvaa: PROD; notified Abhigupta.93 (talk · contribs) 16:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
11. Orchard Park Elementary School: PROD; notified Winterysteppe (talk · contribs) 12:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
    • Reason: An ordinary elementary school, with no evidence of notability.

1. Save The Queen Gin: PROD 17:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Rather promotional article on subject without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
2. Village of Merrick Park: PROD 16:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article, with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Kanda uruvam: PROD; notified Neilquadras (talk · contribs) 14:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability.
4. IgHome: PROD; notified Michieldewit (talk · contribs) 11:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
5. Symbaloo: PROD 11:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
6. Edinburgh Chess Club: PROD 16:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Amarildo Fecanji: PROD; notified AmarildoFecanji (talk · contribs) 16:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Only one of the cited sources gives more than passing mention of Amarildo Fecanji, and that one is not an independent source.
2. Dana Offenbach: PROD 16:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Cited sources either barely mention her or are not independent sources.
3. Grex (actor): PROD 15:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. Sourced to YouTube, Facebook, download sites, etc. Apparently he acted in what appears to be a non-notable non-commercial film, and that's it.
4. Heidi Guenther: BLP PROD; notified KRPhillips0726 (talk · contribs) 17:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
5. Massriot: PROD 12:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A rather promotional article, not citing any sources, and not in English. The subject may be suitable for a suitable article, but this is not that article.
6. മഹാനായ ഷിബി ചക്രവര്ത്തിയുടെ കഥ: PROD; notified Deepknow (talk · contribs) 13:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article, not in English, the subject of which is not easy to identify, but it may be original fiction.
7. Maaya Foundation: PROD 14:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. The only fact sourced is that a prominent actor supports it.
8. P.Shanmugam: BLP PROD; notified Anand agaramcherry (talk · contribs) 17:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
9. The Gryphon: PROD 10:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A local student newspaper, without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The references are not substantial coverage of the subject.
10. Brickey Rangers GAA: PROD 15:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent sources, and no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Appears to be a fairly ordinary club.
11. Helix Magazine: PROD 14:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Local university magazine, with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.

1. First Lady Orchids: PROD; notified Art chadwick62 (talk · contribs) 15:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence that this topic has received enough coverage to be regarded as notable. The only source was added by an editor with a conflict of interest in that source.
2. Michael Naughton: PROD 10:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources. (Repeatedly edited in promotional ways by numerous single-purpose accounts.)
3. Jonabell Farm: PROD; notified APIndysMissingBall (talk · contribs) 17:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The only one of the references which is primarily about this farm is on the web site of the company owning the farm.
4. Cogora: PROD 11:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A largely promotional article without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Most of the "references" don't even mention Cogora, & the few that do either only briefly mention it or are not independent sources, or both.
5. Art Chadwick: PROD; notified Art chadwick62 (talk · contribs) 11:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Not one of the references is substantially about Art Chadwick.
6. In Love With Shah Rukh Khan - The Book: PROD; notified TheNewLog (talk · contribs) 16:07, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article on a book which does not satisfy the notability guidelines. (Created by an editor who self-identifies as the author of the book. Articles on the author's other book and on the author have both been deleted at AfD.)
7. თამარი: PROD; notified Mekoberozashvili (talk · contribs) 12:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Article is in Georgian, and attempts to understand it via Google translation do not provide any evidence that it is about a notable topic. It also seems that it may infringe copyright of the cited source.
8. Totally (company): PROD 16:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Still no evidence of notability, despite being tagged for sources for seven years. The references are (1) a stock market listing, which does not show notability, and (2) a dead link to the company's own web site.
9. Joe Toronto: PROD; notified Joetoronto10 (talk · contribs) 13:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
10. Ernest Lee Straughter: PROD; notified ErnRay25 (talk · contribs) 15:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. The references (some of which are repeated) are mostly a mixture of pages not mentioning him at all and pages merely listing his name in credits. May are blogs, listings at Discogs, etc. The only significant coverage is a couple of reports on a legal claim he has made.
11. Two Minds Crack: PROD 13:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. Even the article says "Success eluded the band".
12. Memory Records: PROD 13:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability
13. Liberal Democrats (Zimbabwe): PROD; notified Vsibbs (talk · contribs) 13:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Of the references, one is the party's own web site, one barely mentions the party in passing, and the others don't mention it at all.)
14. Matt North: PROD; notified Mattnorthofficial (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

1. Bond of Strangers: PROD 10:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. References are one passing mention, one local report, and one speech by a person who describes the film-maker as his "friend". (Created by an editor with a a conflict of interest.)
2. Max Fraser: PROD 10:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. None of the references is significant coverage in a reliable independent source.
3. Love Story (pashto): PROD 15:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. (NOTE: This is one of dozens of similar unsourced articles created by the same editor, using a number of accounts, most of them now blocked. Most of the articles have already been deleted.)
4. Gandagir: PROD 15:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. (NOTE: This is one of dozens of similar unsourced articles created by the same editor, using a number of accounts, most of them now blocked. Most of the articles have already been deleted.)
5. Asif Khan (actor): PROD 15:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. (NOTE: This is one of dozens of similar unsourced articles created by the same editor, using a number of accounts, most of them now blocked. Most of the articles have already been deleted.)
6. Zakhmi zrra: PROD 15:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. (NOTE: This is one of dozens of similar unsourced articles created by the same editor, using a number of accounts, most of them now blocked. Most of the articles have already been deleted.)
7. Haram Khor (pashto): PROD 15:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. (NOTE: This is one of dozens of similar unsourced articles created by the same editor, using a number of accounts, most of them now blocked. Most of the articles have already been deleted.)
8. Qurbani (pashto): PROD 15:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG. (NOTE: This is one of dozens of similar articles created by the same editor, using a number of accounts, most of them now blocked. Most of the articles have already been deleted.)
9. Eclipse OMR: PROD; notified Dorra.bouchiha (talk · contribs) 11:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no evidence at all that the subject is notable enough to be the topic of a Wikipedia article.
10. Kodambakkam (film): PROD 19:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Not notable at all. Still unsourced after being tagged for sources for almost seven years.
11. Varien Inc.: PROD; notified Matinict (talk · contribs) 16:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Absolutely no evidence of notability.
12. Asian Radio: PROD; notified Matinict (talk · contribs) 16:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence anywhere of notability. Even the url which was previously given in the article as the station's web site address now redirects to spam sites.
13. Lucius Petrosidius: PROD; notified PETROSIDIUS (talk · contribs) 13:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence at all of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. He was the subject of a single one-sentence mention in a book, and that is all. Also, most of this article is not even about Lucius Petrosidius.
14. Mark Felton: PROD; notified Markfelton (talk · contribs) 13:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Most of the references are by Felton, not about him, and give the appearance of being there to publicise his work.)
15. Michael Cranny Elementary School: PROD; notified Jith12 (talk · contribs) 15:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Most elementary schools are not considered notable enough to be the subjects of Wikipedia articles, and nothing indicates that this one is exceptional.
16. Disaster Recovery Advisor: PROD 12:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources cited, and searches produce little better.
17. VMGL: PROD 14:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Still no independent sources after being tagged for over six and a half years, and searching failed to produce suitable coverage.

1. Dental Insurance in India: PROD; notified Dental Insurance in India (talk · contribs) 13:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is not so much an encyclopaedia article as a poorly sourced personal essay, written to promote a point of view about its subject.
2. Djamel Tatah: PROD; notified Djamel Tatah (talk · contribs) 14:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources at all.
3. The Hurricane Rainband and Intensity Change Experiment: PROD; notified DrAJones (talk · contribs) 15:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources at all.
4. Cainvest Bank & Trust: PROD 15:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
5. Tartinery Restaurant: PROD 08:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A pair of restaurants, with no evidence of notability. Only one independent reference, and that one is just a brief write up.
6. Ted Staunton: PROD; notified Nikua17123 (talk · contribs) 09:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Lack of substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.
7. Briohny Doyle: PROD; notified Anniethel (talk · contribs) 11:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No sources except a publisher's promotional announcement. Two as yet unpublished books, published essays etc. Also, the article is distinctly promotional in tone.
8. Peter McGill (footballer): PROD 12:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying either WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG.
9. Lakshmi Building: PROD; notified Willard84 (talk · contribs) 19:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
10. List of Norwegian television series: PROD 21:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Almost all entries are unsourced, and in any case this list is of doubtful encyclopaedic value.
11. Our Lady of Faith, Bayyaram: PROD; notified Rajasheartnu (talk · contribs) 21:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable early twentieth century parish church. There must be countless thousands of churches neither more nor less significant than this one.
12. Michael Chudi Ejekam: PROD 13:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable businessman
13. Siddhant shirsat: PROD; notified Chetank9982 (talk · contribs) 14:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable local councillor ("corporator" in Indian terminology).
14. John H. Murphy: PROD 08:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: There is no indication of satisfying the notability guidelines. After existing for over eight and a half years, and being tagged for notability for almost six years, there are still no sources except two dead links which do not seem to have been independent sources, and one which is not publicly visible but which appears to be merely a record of his death.
15. Joshen Bernardo: PROD 14:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. Four of the five references don't even mention Joshen Bernardo, and the other one merely includes his name in a list.
16. Roger A. Agana: PROD 20:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. (References are not independent sources.)
17. Team H2politO: PROD 09:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to non-independent sources, pages not even mentioning Team H2politO, and dead links.
18. Zac Nichols: PROD; notified DarenNoe (talk · contribs) 16:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Most of the references are not substantially about Zac Nichols, and those that are are not significant enough coverage.
19. ВМ МП-УОС: PROD 16:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unsourced and incoherent article, much of it not written in proper English. It also looks very much like a machine translation, suggesting it may infringe copyright.
20. Corvedale Three Castles Walk: PROD; notified Archerbarrie (talk · contribs) 13:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Reads rather like an attempt to publicise the walk.
21. Pitygritty: PROD 14:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Promotional article on a subject without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced to download site, YouTube, promotional sites, etc.

1. Derby School of Music: PROD 14:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
2. Eleonore Zugun: PROD; notified X-Men Xtreme (talk · contribs) 13:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. Sourced only to fringe sources which are presented as though they were uncontroversially factual.
3. Revizor(ukranian telecast): PROD; notified Not ivanBELKIN (talk · contribs) 12:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and not clearly showing notability. Also written in incoherent English, perhaps due to use of automatic translation.
4. Thiramai: PROD; notified Slevoayan (talk · contribs) 12:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article gives no indication that this film is notable, and the only film of this title that I can find by searching is a YouTube video.
5. Antonio Neves: PROD; notified Swamjanion (talk · contribs) 14:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. References include sources only barely mentioning him in passing, sources which are not independent, promotional sources (e.g. a site which says "Our mission is to raise the visibility of tech startups in the silicon prairie region in order to connect entrepreneurs to entrepreneurs and to connect great talent with great companies") a link to a page publicising a book he wrote, and so on...
6. Deirdre Baggot: PROD; notified Trac3Cozen (talk · contribs) 01:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. None of the cited sources is substantially about her.
7. Sangwalkhel: PROD; notified Sangwalkhel (talk · contribs) 13:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Completely unverifiable. I can't find anything about this tribe, under any of the names given in this article, anywhere other than Wikipedia.
8. Peter Filopoulos: PROD 19:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources at all.
9. Gabriel Gonzalez (musician): BLP PROD; notified GABRIEL THE GUN (talk · contribs) 19:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
10. London City F.C.: PROD; notified Jaydbutler (talk · contribs) 15:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Amateur club without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (The one reference doesn't even mention London City F. C.)
11. Beyond Beyond: PROD; notified JGrubbs (talk · contribs) 13:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
12. YCST: PROD 20:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
13. Hiromitsu Takeda: PROD 14:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The only reference does not even mention Hiromitsu Takeda.
14. CloudRail: PROD; notified Stevengatjen (talk · contribs) 10:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. No independent sources at all.
15. Ameri Holdings, Inc. (Ameri100): PROD; notified Chilliflake (talk · contribs) 11:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. Sourced only to press releases.
16. Mechagore: PROD; notified İmaginitesoft (talk · contribs) 12:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
17. Lanier R. Cadungog: BLP PROD; notified Cowboyjuan (talk · contribs) 12:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
18. Etika: PROD 11:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Just a dictionary definition: more suitable for adding to the wiktionary article about the word "etika".
19. Jafar Rahimtoola: PROD 19:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. None of the sources does more than briefly mention him in passing, and several merely include his name in a list.

1. Rajendra Shingne: BLP PROD; notified AdityaDavhale (talk · contribs) 20:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
2. Muslims at the major Beauty Pageants: PROD; notified Neebras (talk · contribs) 11:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence that this is a topic which has received any significant coverage. Also, no sources at all.
3. List of Black Tennis players: PROD; notified Neebras (talk · contribs) 11:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence that this topic satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. I Love You 2: PROD 11:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article on a film with no evidence of notability. (It was created by a block-evading sockpuppet of an editor with an extensive history of creating often promotional articles on non-notable films and actors.)
5. Matthew Raggett: PROD; notified Logjinks (talk · contribs) 14:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. Just a headmaster, not a particularly special one.
6. DebreBirhan sellase church: PROD; notified Sola.abe (talk · contribs) 14:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.

1. Story of manila: PROD; notified Alfin davis (talk · contribs) 10:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
2. Farooq Kashmiri: BLP PROD; notified Saad1622 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
3. Gader (2016 Film) (2016 Film): PROD; notified Djskp (talk · contribs) 20:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and little evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Gader (2016 Film): PROD 20:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and little evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
5. Outox Reset Drink Team: PROD 19:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability in the article, and very little to be found anywhere else. Still totally unsourced after being tagged for sources for nearly three months.
6. Hana Saeidi: BLP PROD; notified JodyBo (talk · contribs) 10:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
7. Jeff Smith (meteorologist): BLP PROD; notified JP56787 (talk · contribs) 11:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
8. List of U.S. state microbes: PROD 09:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A list of one unsourced item, together with two "might be" items which don't even qualify, both suggested years ago and then dropped? Not at all notable. A brief mention in the article Oregon might be considered, but that's all.
9. Parannur Ibrahim Musliyar: PROD 12:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A rather promotional article without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. None of the references does more than list his name.
10. NedInfra: PROD 12:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. Still no independent sources after being tagged for sources for seven years.
11. Targeting (film): PROD 12:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. References are not independent, not reliable sources, or only briefly mention the film.
12. Implied multiple: PROD 14:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: An unsourced article, very unclearly written so that it's hard to know what it means.
13. CrazyFlie: PROD; notified Jayneesh (talk · contribs) 15:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.
14. Gaurav pandey: BLP PROD; notified Gaurav Pandey1009 (talk · contribs) 11:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
15. José Antonio Caro Díaz: BLP PROD; notified श्रेष्ठ भूपेन्द्र (talk · contribs) 11:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
16. EventQL: PROD; notified Fnord555 (talk · contribs) 11:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
17. The Wild Eight (video game): PROD; notified HeadlessIvan (talk · contribs) 11:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Not enough coverage to indicate that this game satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
18. RAID HQ: PROD; notified Ice EPS (talk · contribs) 11:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
19. Sahi Abbas Uddin: BLP PROD; notified Sahi Abbas Uddin (talk · contribs) 14:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
20. Meg Thomann: PROD; notified Meg Thomann (talk · contribs) 14:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. The references give no more than passing mentions, or inclusion of her name in a list.
21. Astroglide: PROD 20:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. One reference is a dead link, one only briefly mentions Astroglide, and the other does not mention Astroglide at all (it merely considers properties of a substance which is included in Astroglide).
22. Abdul Karim Laghari: PROD 12:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: An unsourced biography, without any real evidence of notability. It has never had any sources, and has been tagged for sources for over seven years.
23. Ali Hashim Abdi: PROD 12:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. ComicBlitz: PROD; notified DivyaBlitz (talk · contribs) 13:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
2. Stion: PROD 14:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
3. Vinny Bee: PROD 15:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Robert L. FitzPatrick: PROD 14:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: After being tagged for notability for six years, the article still does not indicate notability. Almost all of the references are dead links or pages which don't mention him at all or mention him only briefly or non-independent sources.
5. Nicholas Young (MTPD): PROD; notified Cop11 (talk · contribs) 09:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: (1) The subject of the article seems to be publicly visible because of one incident, without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (2) Most of the content of the article is unsourced. (3) Such a an article on someone "alleged" to have committed a crime is probably contrary to the policy on biographies of living persons.
6. Ajay Bakshi: PROD 13:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Refs are a dead link, two papers co-authored by him, not about him, and a page on the web site of a company he works for.)
7. Muhammad Akbar Dar: PROD 15:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. One reference doesn't mention him, and the other merely includes him in a list of names.
8. Musketeer Chess: PROD; notified Musketeerchess2016 (talk · contribs) 15:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence at all of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Hyona Park: PROD 12:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited source does not provide evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and her greatest significance seems to be once being a runner-up in a not very notable contest.
2. Fibonacci Spacers: PROD; notified Elzonor (talk · contribs) 15:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of notability, and apparently promotional in purpose.
3. Westminster Palace Gardens: PROD; notified WPG Freehold (talk · contribs) 15:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Melody B. Choi: PROD 08:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Minor actress who has played only small parts. (For example, the cast list for "Godzilla (2014)" at IMDb lists her as "SF School Bus Kid #1" out of five "SF School Bus Kids", and for "Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days" IMDb lists her way down the cast list as "Snack Bar Girl".) The sources are IMDb and a couple of sites which merely give a list of films she has acted in, there is no substantial coverage.
5. Christopher Granville: PROD 12:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The one source that might be considered independent (Russia Journal) only briefly mentions him in passing.
6. Lawrence Brainard: PROD 12:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.
7. Association of Grace Baptist Churches (South East): PROD; notified SteveC74 (talk · contribs) 14:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.
8. David joy: BLP PROD; notified Nathan Parr (talk · contribs) 15:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
9. Nadia Min Dern Heng: BLP PROD; notified Jourdan Ann (talk · contribs) 14:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
10. Kody keplinger: BLP PROD; notified Jess2016 (talk · contribs) 16:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
11. Clash with DD: PROD 12:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Absolutely no evidence whatever of notability.
12. Crna Gora News Agency: PROD; notified Željko0209 (talk · contribs) 12:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Scarcely any independent coverage can be found anywhere.
13. FESOM: PROD; notified Koldunovn (talk · contribs) 14:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.
14. St. Olav's Church, Serampore: PROD; notified PIN 712201 (talk · contribs) 16:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
15. Yansong Pang: PROD; notified Evolerpang (talk · contribs) 14:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
16. S. Michael Hudson: PROD; notified K. I. Foeline (talk · contribs) 15:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Some of the references don't mention Hudson, others merely briefly mention him or just include his name in a list, some are by him (not about him) and none that I have seen is substantial coverage in an independent source.
17. Karina Wong: PROD; notified Benhlady (talk · contribs) 21:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. A schoolgirl who once took part in a baking competition and finished in the first five, and that's it.
18. Wheatfield Football: PROD; notified DSimmington (talk · contribs) 21:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence whatever of notability.
19. Smita Jain: PROD; notified Ranger867 (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Neither of the references which are not on Wikipedia does more than barely mention her.)
20. HUMANT (HUManoid ANT) algorithm: PROD; notified Unist1984 (talk · contribs) 14:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources cited.
21. HANEEF AZHAR: BLP PROD; notified Hanifmohammad (talk · contribs) 14:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
22. Marisa Olson: PROD 11:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Several of the references are dead links, several are her own web site or other sites which are not independent of her. The only one which could be regarded as an independent source is a post in an "online diary" (i.e. blog) on the web site of the New York Times, which gives a few remarks about her blog, not even about her art.
23. Olia Lialina: PROD 12:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Many of the references are dead links, several are pages which don't mention her, others are a blog which merely quotes a "Tweet" by her, a page which merely includes her name in a list of 94 artists who have work at the institution on whose web site the list appears, and several pages by her (not about her).
24. Dr Bodh Narayan Jha: PROD; notified Champaranwiki (talk · contribs) 13:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sourced only to a one-sentence Facebook page, and no evidence of notability found anywhere else either.

1. The Light Bulb model: PROD; notified Vishu2610 (talk · contribs) 13:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not remotely suitable as a Wikipedia article. It looks sort of like a text book example to illustrate some mathematical methods, except that it is too incoherent to belong in any decent textbook.
2. Fascist anarchism: PROD 14:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
3. Heather Martin (designer): PROD; notified Lucie Hennings (talk · contribs) 15:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: A article which is somewhat promotional in tone, without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Two of the references don't even mention her, and none of the others is an independent source.
4. Luiyi Black Side: BLP PROD; notified Snakebite6666 (talk · contribs) 15:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
5. Flag of the Pakistani Community of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland: PROD 17:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources cited, and none anywhere that I can find. Possibly an attempt to use Wikipedia to publicise a new design.
6. Kwang Lee: PROD 21:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Still no clear evidence of notability, after being tagged for 16 months. References include non-independent sources, such as publicity for a gallery showing her work, and sources barely mentioning her.
7. St. Hilda's College Boat Club: PROD; notified Sbiasi97 (talk · contribs) 14:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: College boat club with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sourcing.
8. 301.li: PROD; notified Zykatious (talk · contribs) 17:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
9. Zackary Medeiros: BLP PROD; notified Dr walsh (talk · contribs) 21:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
10. Principles of layout: PROD; notified Kinju rajawat (talk · contribs) 12:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: A vague essay, without clear enough context, rather than an encyclopaedia article.
11. Yeung Nga Ting: PROD; notified Sakura B (talk · contribs) 12:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sources are merely listing pages.
12. Emma Jacobs: PROD; notified Lightitup (talk · contribs) 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. References are wikia, IMDb, and two pages that don't even mention her. Nothing better found on searching.
13. WGPG-LP: PROD; notified Nametable (talk · contribs) 14:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
14. Kilp Barfungpa: BLP PROD; notified Zephyrdyno (talk · contribs) 14:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
15. Ruff (operating system): PROD; notified Jingtianwei (talk · contribs) 16:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, either in the article or found on searching.
16. List of Bangladeshi comedians: PROD 14:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: This article has spent most of its history containing entries most of which were not Bangladeshi, not comedians, not notable, and in some cases all three. It may to have been created as vandalism. Now that these spurious entries have been removed, it is a pointless list with just one entry.

1. Household Stone tools of Karnataka: PROD; notified Kireadsalot (talk · contribs) 20:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence either that any of these are peculiar to Karnataka, or that the topic as a whole satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Even the creator of the article has stated that there are no reliable references available!
2. African American History in Spartanburg, SC: PROD; notified Drcljones (talk · contribs) 21:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Virtually no content, and no evidence whatever that the subject is notable enough for inclusion.
3. Tau I. Robinson-Farrar: BLP PROD; notified Rainbowcurse9a (talk · contribs) 22:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
4. Traven: PROD 17:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary
5. Zipkin: PROD; notified Khtan66 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
6. Victor Romero: BLP PROD; notified Nicolopezs (talk · contribs) 21:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
7. Kaden Lanier: BLP PROD; notified Ctlover10 (talk · contribs) 22:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
8. 网红经济: PROD; notified YanShu0630 (talk · contribs) 16:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: It is difficult to determine exactly what this is about, but as far as I can judge from Google translation, it is at best a personal essay, and possibly promotional.
9. AliSQL: PROD; notified Cvp16 (talk · contribs) 17:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
10. Emil Weber Meek: BLP PROD; notified Patrick3re (talk · contribs) 17:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
11. UCC Express: PROD; notified UCCExpress (talk · contribs) 13:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: A student newspaper at a college, with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
12. Neermaathalathinte pookkal: PROD 13:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. Sourced only to IMDb.
13. Maranjab Caravanserai: PROD; notified Ehsan.notash (talk · contribs) 15:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Virtually no content, and no evidence of notability.

1. Abdulahi Bille Nour: BLP PROD; notified Mog123 (talk · contribs) 12:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
2. Kiran G.nath: BLP PROD; notified Aaryadevikunjamma (talk · contribs) 16:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
3. Resonate (East Asian culture website): PROD; notified Coco2791 (talk · contribs) 13:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No independent sources. No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Markus Linecker: PROD; notified Markuslin (talk · contribs) 15:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No independent reliable sources at all, and no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
5. Sara Hart Weir: PROD; notified Sarahartweir (talk · contribs) 15:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No independent sources at all, and no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability criteria.
6. Ivan Dimitrovski: BLP PROD; notified Prilepcanec21 (talk · contribs) 17:24, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
7. Ford F-Series fourteenth generation: PROD; notified DorianGrey14 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Totally unsourced.
8. Metropolitano Histórico de Madrid: PROD; notified EHS2017 (talk · contribs) 16:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
9. GamingAnywhere: PROD; notified Disket01 (talk · contribs) 20:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
10. Dwarkanath Chuckerbartty: PROD; notified Rajdeep.iicb (talk · contribs) 16:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: The article cites no sources, nothing can be found about this person anywhere except Wikipedia, making verification impossible.
11. Sukanya Kulkarni: BLP PROD; notified Aryan momo (talk · contribs) 13:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
12. Empire TV Tycoon: PROD; notified ThunderGemios10 (talk · contribs) 20:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent sources, and no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
13. Team GrisGris: PROD; notified ThunderGemios10 (talk · contribs) 20:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent sources, and no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
14. Swarm-Bruteforcer: PROD; notified Syphine16 (talk · contribs) 23:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
15. Superman (Hernan Guerra): PROD; notified Beetlebooster (talk · contribs) 13:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
16. Anna L. Kiss: PROD; notified Anatomiasevera (talk · contribs) 13:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying either the general notability guideline or the guideline on notability of academics.
17. Ayesha Jahanzeb: BLP PROD; notified Haider Khan 11 (talk · contribs) 15:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
18. The Basement Collection: PROD 10:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The references include blogs, sources which only briefly mention the subject, a review in a minor source, etc.
19. Stephania Sanquiz: BLP PROD; notified Stephania Sanquiz (talk · contribs) 23:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
20. Project Graduate: PROD 12:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The one source cited is not substantial enough.
21. Double the Numbers: PROD 13:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Firstly, this article is largely promotional. Secondly, there is no evidence of notability. None of the cited sources actually mentions "Double the Numbers". (Refs available at http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/press/cost04/EducationPays2004.pdf & https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=151120095066120016087106105004097102127011057072042089006121100108082093085068113123001032026043123061021018125102114078115005042094013031116029000094103119101049039011091091104028079073070101126004064115090071000122111094114114068075020074015117&EXT=pdf)
22. Chester E Groth Music Co: PROD; notified Mnjazz (talk · contribs) 16:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to the company's own web site, and searches found nothing better.

1. Hari prabhakaran: PROD; notified Ramforprogress (talk · contribs) 20:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: The one independent source cited does not establish notability, nor does anything found on searching.
2. Tomoaki sato: PROD; notified Biloorr3 (talk · contribs) 17:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No clear indication of notability, somewhat promotional, and if it is to be kept it needs a complete rewrite from scratch to make it coherent English.
3. Ryan Shorthouse: BLP PROD; notified Marikalazi (talk · contribs) 14:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
4. Ryan Shorthouse: PROD; notified Marikalazi (talk · contribs) 15:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The one reference cited gives a brief 2 sentence mention of him, and searches found little in independent sources.
5. Mustapha Sheikh: PROD; notified Intuitivephonemes (talk · contribs) 21:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: A minor academic with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
6. Takashi Fukutani: PROD; notified James hook (talk · contribs) 22:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
7. Chiefs of Ontario: PROD; notified Chiefsofontario (talk · contribs) 23:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.

1. Mako (template engine): PROD 19:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (No independent source cited in the article, and nothing suitable found on searching.)

1. Simmie Hayes: BLP PROD; notified Simmiehayes (talk · contribs) 20:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
2. Robert Mearns: PROD; notified Rossna20 (talk · contribs) 20:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources are cited, and I have been unable to find any confirmation anywhere of the existence of a Major General Robert Mearns.
3. Six determinants of gait: PROD; notified Eofori4 (talk · contribs) 21:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence that this is a notable topic. It appears to be just one person's classification.
4. Minimalist (Heuristic): PROD; notified Gregori Miler (talk · contribs) 14:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article on a subject without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
5. Winglights: PROD; notified CYCLBIKE (talk · contribs) 13:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: The brief coverage in the one cited source comes nowhere near to demonstrating that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
6. Schools in Aurangabad: PROD 14:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not a single one of these entries has any source to support it.
7. Whirlpool Jet Boat Tours: PROD 15:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Uniwell Corporation: PROD; notified Poslynx (talk · contribs) 14:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources cited, and no substantial independent coverage found on searching.
2. Unn Røyneland: BLP PROD; notified André N. Dannevig (talk · contribs) 14:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
3. Myatt's Fields South Estate: PROD; notified Ruthlang (talk · contribs) 20:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Unn Røyneland: PROD 10:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources. Paid article created to publicise or promote it subject.
5. Telkom-1: PROD; notified Woerayraiyan56 (talk · contribs) 10:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Completely unsourced and unverifiable. Also, the text is almost all a verbatim copy from Telkom-3S.
6. Rebekah Robertson: PROD; notified Gsjrs (talk · contribs) 12:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. All of the references are either not independent sources, do not mention her, or barely mention her.
7. Amanda Berghain: BLP PROD; notified Collectioncowboy (talk · contribs) 13:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
8. Mumbai-kolhapur Mahalaxmi Express: PROD 10:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines
9. Psychomotorics: PROD; notified DrPoglum (talk · contribs) 21:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: None of the cited sources mentions the word "Psychomotorics", nor can I find any evidence of its use in English.
10. Jason Fernandes Silva: BLP PROD; notified Jason fernandes04 (talk · contribs) 16:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
11. International Maritime Academy: PROD 10:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
12. Unbounded success: PROD 10:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: I can't actually find any mention of "Unbounded success" in any of the references. (If it is there, please provide clearer information, at least a page number.)
13. Ysgol Iolo Morgannwg: PROD; notified Brych34 (talk · contribs) 20:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: An ordinary primary school, with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Vishwa Sandesh Weekly: PROD; notified Bipubiju (talk · contribs) 12:57, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
2. Magna mike 8600: PROD; notified Chetna.S (talk · contribs) 10:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Distorted Cuts: PROD; notified MarcoCYouLater (talk · contribs) 19:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of notability
4. Jung Se Woon: PROD; notified Ansonsonn (talk · contribs) 14:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
5. Pinuvadi: PROD; notified Admi99 (talk · contribs) 10:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
6. Juan Azmi: PROD; notified Hafiidhalqadri (talk · contribs) 21:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
7. Blanque (comics): PROD; notified SaffLLC (talk · contribs) 13:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of coming anywhere near to being notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article,
8. 2017 Hampden–Sydney Tigers football team: PROD; notified JohnEarleiv (talk · contribs) 22:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: I am doubtful that this team satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines at all, but the particular team membership for one season comes nowhere near to being notable enough to justify having its own article.
9. Light (fantasy): PROD 23:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: It may be possible to write a useful article on the subject, but this isn't it. Unsourced, & trivial in content.

1. Octoparse: PROD 22:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else provides evidence that this satisfies Wikipedia's notability requirements.
2. SimpleTest: PROD 22:28, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines.
3. Gladiacoin: PROD; notified Coloneljo (talk · contribs) 22:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Michael Daley (Anaesthetist): PROD; notified Medical Archivist (talk · contribs) 22:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. At the most, he is an ordinary doctor who had temporary prominence in connection with one event.
5. Tariq rehmani: PROD; notified Tariq rehmani (talk · contribs) 10:56, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
6. Jin Zhengkun: PROD 14:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. The references are a report of one lecture he gave, and a three-sentence reference to his work in a book. He appears to be a fairly ordinary academic.
7. Foreign Pre Medical Test: PROD 20:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the content of the article nor anything else found on searching suggests this test is notable by Wikipedia standards.
8. Evermeet: Island of Elves: PROD 14:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, either in the article or elsewhere.
9. Richard Baptist: BLP PROD; notified Richbapt (talk · contribs) 17:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
10. Becky Schwartz: PROD; notified Booklover987 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence whatever, either in the article or anywhere else, of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
11. Nanaimo Art Gallery: PROD; notified M.Hinbest (talk · contribs) 21:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent sources, and no evidence of notability.

1. Protidaan: PROD; notified Shafi674838393939 (talk · contribs) 16:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. Most mentions are in sources such as blogs, YouTube, etc.
2. Pressterror: PROD 08:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the content of the article nor the available sources give any evidence that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Raozan University College: PROD 12:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. (The college's web site consists largely of place-holder pages, its "All Teacher List" lists just one teacher, and it is difficult to find any other source about it other than Facebook.)
4. Lawrence Kopp: PROD; notified Ksemps49 (talk · contribs) 14:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources.
5. Dancing Dad: PROD; notified Sahil Jakir Shaikh (talk · contribs) 15:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence at all of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
6. Cefncaeau: PROD; notified Rhedyn2 (talk · contribs) 16:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Just a housing estate without evidence of notability.
7. Mournful Congregation: PROD 15:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, wither in the article or found on searching. Article still unsourced more than 11 years after creation & more than 7 years since being tagged for sources.
8. Manaka Iwami: BLP PROD; notified Namaikinashojo (talk · contribs) 21:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
9. Biju dharmapalan: BLP PROD; notified Bijutrivandrum (talk · contribs) 16:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

1. Public Lands Alliance: PROD 12:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, wither cited in the article or found on searching. (Still totally unsourced after being tagged for over 5 years.)
2. Adolphus Peine: PROD 13:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else indicates that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Rising World: PROD; notified Gopherholeservers (talk · contribs) 16:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Anne Stokes: PROD 20:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The cited sources do not give substantial coverage.
5. BidFX: PROD; notified Balip96 (talk · contribs) 14:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Sourced only to prnewswire and a listing at companies house, and searches produced no significant coverage.)
6. Voyagin: PROD 14:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else found shows that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
7. P-Rock: PROD 12:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
8. STH-10 Siren: PROD 13:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. (Tagged for sources for over four and a half years and still none; tagged for notability for two years.)
9. K. Prapanjan: BLP PROD; notified John choudhary (talk · contribs) 20:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
10. Sue Wallace: BLP PROD; notified Dopenguins (talk · contribs) 20:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

1. Q-Saalschütz summation formula: PROD; notified MathXplore (talk · contribs) 17:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No context, no indication of the formula's significance, and not at all meaningful to anyone not already having an expert knowledge of the background. Unsuitable for an encyclopaedia aimed at the general reader.
2. Heine's summation formula: PROD; notified MathXplore (talk · contribs) 17:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No context, no indication of the formula's significance, and not at all meaningful to anyone not already having an expert knowledge of the background. Unsuitable for an encyclopaedia aimed at the general reader.
3. The Pineapples: PROD; notified The wicked ape (talk · contribs) 15:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. MinerGate: PROD; notified MiningInfo (talk · contribs) 16:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence at all of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Sourced only to the MinerGate's own web site and an open wiki.)
5. Purushottam Subedi: PROD; notified Purumuzik1 (talk · contribs) 12:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the content of the article, the cited references, nor anything else found gives any indication that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
6. The Voice Kids (Poland series 1): PROD 11:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Totally unsourced on an article about a series which has yet to air. No evidence that it satisfies the notability guidelines yet.
7. Pundit Arena: PROD 14:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources do not establish notability. (Tagged for notability for over a year and a half, with no improvement.)
8. Go Green Initiative: PROD 11:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: Absolutely no evidence of notability, either in the article or elsewhere. Sourced entirely to the organisation's own web site. Sources are no better than they were nine years ago when concerns were raised.
9. Victor Navone: PROD 15:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (After being tagged for references for five months it is still sourced only to blogs.)

1. Jillian Beyor: PROD 21:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not notable. Even after being tagged for sources for almost 8 years, there is a lack of independent sources, and no evidence of notability elsewhere.
2. Lee Jae-hwang: PROD 15:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. The only ref is a dead link. Google search for his Korean name gives Wikipedia, another wiki, instagram, facebook, twitter, youtube, etc. Search for "Lee Jae-hwang" similar results. IMDb lists only 3 of the roles listed here, & has a one-sentence bio of him.
3. Unnax: PROD 17:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Distinctly promotional, and no evidence of notability. Most of the references give no more than passing mentions of Unnax.
4. Plan 9 (2015 film): PROD; notified Goodbadnugly (talk · contribs) 21:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Some of the references aren't even about this film, others are not significant coverage.
5. Funny candy of Okashinana!?: PROD 21:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
6. Plan 9 (2015 film): PROD; notified Goodbadnugly (talk · contribs) 16:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: I put a proposed deletion (PROD) on this article, giving my reason as "There is no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Some of the references aren't even about this film, others are not significant coverage." The creator of the article, Goodbadnugly, removed the proposal, giving as reason that the film derives notability from its connection to the earlier film Plan 9 from Outer Space of which it is a take-off, and from "the presence of notable internet personalities". As anyone familiar with Wikipedia's notability standards will know, a subject is not considered to be notable because of association with other notable subjects, and must have evidence of notability in its own right.

My reason for this nomination is the same as the reason for my earlier deletion proposal, but here is a more detailed account of why the cited sources don't do it. Out of the eight sources cited, four are about the earlier film, and don't even mention this one. Not only are the other four not being significant coverage, but also none of them is an independent reliable source either. Two of them are at www.horrorsociety.com, which not only publishes user-submitted content, but also says "You want to promote your movie, do it here." Another source is at letterboxd.com, which reproduces film data from TMDb (www.themoviedb.org); TMDb consists entirely of user-submitted content, and appears to be if anything an even less reliable source than IMDb, of which it is clearly an imitation. That leaves just one more cited source, which is at plan9movie.com, and I think the URL says it all. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

1. Bad Roomies: PROD 20:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Self-published film with no evidence of notability.
2. Omesh Bajpai: PROD; notified Omeshbajpai (talk · contribs) 09:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Self-promotional article written by and about a person with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Simmons Research: PROD 20:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources to not provide evidence of satisfying Wikiedia's notability guidelines, nor does anything else I have seen.
4. Combatron: PROD 16:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and no evidence of notability.
5. Windbreaker (Transformers): PROD 16:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: One minor fictitious character. No evidence of notability.

1. Christian Cantamessa: PROD; notified Smmorris7 (talk · contribs) 15:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Absolutely no evidence at all of satisfying the notability guidelines. Most of the references are either mere listings of credits or unreliable sources (e.g. Wikipedia & IMDb) and the others give him only minor coverage (in one case none at all) or are not independent sources.
2. Fanny Sidney: PROD 14:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability, either in the article or found elsewhere. She seems to have mainly performed in non-notable works. Still no source cited apart from IMDb after being tagged for sources for over 5 years.
3. Amir Hossain: PROD 09:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, either in the cited sources or anywhere found on searching. He's a judge, and that's about it.
4. S.M. Mozibur Rahman: PROD 09:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, either in the cited sources or anywhere found on searching. He's a judge, and that's about it.
5. Md. Ruhul Quddus: PROD 09:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, either in the cited sources or anywhere found on searching. He's a judge, and that's about it.
6. Zombie Grenades Practice: PROD; notified Avpwashere (talk · contribs) 13:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.
7. Julia Ratcliffe (engineer): PROD 13:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: The available sources do not demonstrate that the subject satisfies the notability guidelines.

1. Chessaria: The Tactical Adventure: PROD; notified PixelMatt (talk · contribs) 12:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources.
2. Hollywood Road London: PROD; notified Streetsofswlondon (talk · contribs) 19:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: An ordinary residential street with no claim to notability.
3. Tregunter Road: PROD 19:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: An ordinary residential street with no claim to notability. (Still totally unsourced after being tagged for sources for almost five years.)
4. A Girl From A Box: PROD; notified Lexinterior4 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. No sources cited, and none found except Facebook.
5. Laddership: PROD; notified Somik (talk · contribs) 20:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence that this concept is notable. It appears to be mentioned only in a limited range of related sources, and when the word "laddership" appears it usually does not refer to this movement.
6. Réalité Pilée: PROD 15:53, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else I have been able to find gives any evidence that this is anything other than a neologism which has yet to become notable. (Most if not all of the links given are to pages which don't even mention "Réalité Pliée".)
7. Bhumika Dash: PROD 16:43, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else found on searching indicates notability by Wikipedia standards.
8. CPIT Co., Ltd: PROD 12:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Still no adequate sources after being tagged for almost 8 years.)
9. Acaciawood Preparatory Academy: PROD 12:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability.
10. International Journal of Case Reports and Images: PROD; notified Laxhmidhar (talk · contribs) 14:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability
11. Space Studio West London: PROD; notified Rory evan (talk · contribs) 14:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. (Also somewhat promotional.)

1. Boffin of the Yale: PROD; notified Tolkienfan12 (talk · contribs) 09:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Insourced, and no evidence that this topic is notable, or that it has any significant coverage anywhere other than the book in which it appears. (Incidentally also a complete mess: a seriously misformatted article, apparently not proof-read by its creator.)
2. The Beautiful Letdown (band): PROD 15:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Absolutely no evidence of notability. (After being tagged for sources for more than a year, the article has no references that actually mention "The Beautiful Letdown".)

1. File:Dhirendra Pratap Singh at Goa beach.jpg: PROD 20:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Personal photograph of the uploader, used only in numerous self-promotional user pages created in 2013 and now deleted. Unlikely to ever have any legitimate use.
2. Party of Changes: PROD; notified Social Studies Rules (talk · contribs) 15:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The "proposed" name of a party that does not yet exist, with the only reference being merely an announcement of the intention of forming the party.
3. An Evening with Marty: PROD; notified Offthehooktv (talk · contribs) 19:31, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Victoria Hogg: PROD 19:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: After being tagged for notability for eight years, there are still no sources indicating that she satisfies the notability guidelines.

1. Government Medical College, Faizabad: PROD 11:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources cited, and no evidence found on searching that this proposal for a possible new college is notable.
2. 2046 FIFA World Cup: PROD 20:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Absolutely no sources, no indication of satisfying the notability guidelines, and no significant content. Numerous similar articles have been deleted as a result of time-wasting discussions: let this one go without such waste of time.
3. Pluto Press: PROD 14:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. References are passing mentions, inclusions in lists, blogs, the press's own web site, etc.
4. Interlude (magic trick): PROD 12:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. (Still totally unsourced after being tagged for sources for over 11 years.)
5. File:Misled1.jpg: PROD 12:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Pointless image with no likely use, never used in its 11-year history as far as I can determine.
6. Jumanji (2019 film): PROD; notified TestiniFamily (talk · contribs) 22:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Proposed future film with no substantial coverage yet in any significant source. The article is sourced only to IMdB, and even that does not support the content of this article: for example, the cast list is strikingly different.
7. Honorio C. Navarro: PROD; notified Malinao1234 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Highest achievement "second vice mayor".)
8. Bandha Mayale: PROD 11:52, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. It looks like an impressive list of references, but checking with Google translate they do not turn out to be substantial coverage in independent sources.
9. San Isidro Labrador Parish, Alabel: PROD 19:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Just an ordinary church parish, with no more notability than thousands of others. Also, distinctly promotional.
10. Dans le Noir: PROD 10:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else suggests that this business satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
11. Vasily Fomichev: PROD 20:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines

1. Informatics Practices: PROD 13:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no evidence that this is a generally recognised category. Searches for sources indicate that the expression is entirely or almost entirely restricted to one school exam syllabus, and there does not seem to be substantial coverage of it as a subject.
2. Haqiem Rusli: PROD 15:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: A fan-produced page without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The one reference is merely a list of biographical details, not substantial coverage.
3. Basic Pay Scale: PROD 09:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No more than a dictionary definition. WP:DICDEF
4. Henrietta Kosoko: PROD 08:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the references nor anything else indicates that she was a notable actress.
5. Garfield Originals: PROD 12:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No independent coverage of this "upcoming" show, and even the one non-independent source gives only trivial coverage and does not support most of the content of the article.
6. Christopher J. Bishop: PROD 20:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. He appears to be a perfectly ordinary academic. Most of the references are papers by him, not about him, two merely include him in lists, and the other one is a paper which refers to a result of his, but is not about him.
7. Barratt–Milnor sphere: PROD 20:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not notable. Sourced only to a paper by Barratt & Milnor, and my searches for other sources have produced very few mentions, almost all of those being Wikipedia, Wikipedia mirrors, etc, and the odd exception to that mentions the topic but does not give it substantial coverage.
8. Jussi-Pekka Rantanen: PROD; notified Spinster300 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines
9. Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research: PROD; notified Zbynekv (talk · contribs) 13:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. References are just listings in catalogues and the editors' bios on a web site of the publisher.

1. Sales acceleration: PROD 12:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Little more than a dicdef for the concept. Both the references are written by people who run "sales acceleration" businesses, and appear to exist for promotional purposes. No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines.
2. Mathematical practice: PROD 19:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article which reads more like a personal essay than an encyclopaedia article. There does not seem to be much coverage of this topic per se, and its validity was questioned 15 years ago, and not clarified since.
3. Monaghan Intermediate Football Championship: PROD 20:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The only independent source cited does not even mention the Monaghan Intermediate Football Championship.
4. Paul Stein (accordionist): PROD 12:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. No independent reliable sources cited, and nothing significant found on searching.
5. Gurpreet Sandhu: PROD 14:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Kashmir Monitor: PROD 09:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. None of the sources contains significant coverage of the Kashmir Monitor, and one of them deosn't even mention it.
2. Planck angle: PROD 15:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. Over three years ago it was questioned whether this concept has been used outside the original paper, and since then no evidence has been provided. All the other uses of the expression that I have found are either not in reliable sources, not referring to thee meaning described in this article, or both.
3. Red auxiliary number: PROD 15:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no evidence that this concept exists anywhere except in the work of one person, who has posted to blogs and other unreliable sources about it. The creator of this article has stated that he is that blogger. The status of this article as "original research" was raised on the talk page as far back as 2008, and it should have been deleted long ago.

1. Kasthuribai Nagar, Anakaputhur: PROD; notified Xmpr15 (talk · contribs) 15:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources cited, and no evidence of notability.
2. M.G.R. Nagar, Anakaputhur: PROD 15:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources cited, and no evidence of notability.
3. Anna Nagar, Anakaputhur: PROD 15:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources cited, and no evidence of notability.
4. Kanniayamman Koil Street, Anakaputhur: PROD; notified Xmpr15 (talk · contribs) 15:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and arguably an attack page.
5. Richard A. Barone: PROD 14:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Despite the attempt to saturate the article with references, none of them gives the sort of coverage needed to establish notability. There is no more evidence of notability than when Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard A. Barone produced an unambiguous consensus to delete.
6. Burndy: PROD 15:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources do not establish notability by Wikipedia standards, nor does anything else. (Also largely promotional, created by an editor with an unambiguous conflict of interest.)

1. TinyMe: PROD 22:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not at all notable, as confirmed by searching for sources. Even the distribution's own site (the only one cited in the article) is dead.

1. The Hare: PROD; notified Londonergezzer (talk · contribs) 12:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
2. Wilkinson Gallery: PROD 12:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines
3. Jhansi Ki Rani (2019 TV series): PROD; notified Nihar POPS (talk · contribs) 15:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The cited sources are basically just announcements that it is going to be aired.

1. ParcelBright: PROD 12:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. (Still no evidence after being tagged for four years.)
2. Sanhash Media & Entertainment: PROD 08:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. Completely unsourced, and web searches indicate a small business with no notability.
3. Ageometresia: PROD 14:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is just a dictionary entry, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The suggestion was made that it be transwikied to Wiktionary, but that suggestion was declined by a Wiktionary administrator, who (quite rightly) pointed out that it does not satisfy Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

1. ThinkBlocks: PROD 15:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (References are blogspot, YouTube, WordPress pages, sources not independent of the creator of "ThinkBlocks", sources not giving substantial coverage to the subject.)
2. Gareth West (actor): PROD; notified Tylerjon7 (talk · contribs) 19:56, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Ametrom: PROD; notified Tlafontaine (talk · contribs) 01:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
4. Rickey Thompson (Digital Star): BLP PROD; notified Hadtohavehighhopes (talk · contribs) 16:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
5. Vision Think Tank: PROD; notified Vincitore99 (talk · contribs) 13:12, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

1. File:Logo of Vale Park Primary School.jpg: PROD 11:43, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Logo for a primary school. Unused and unlikely to be used.
2. Madhurasmitham: PROD; notified Gayathrikarthika (talk · contribs) 20:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: At best the film is not notable, and possibly nonexistent. None of the verifiable references mentions this film, and one of them is completely unrelated to the topic. Searches have produced only a small number of unreliable sources, some of them clearly derived from Wikipedia.
3. Edwin Hillyer: PROD; notified WaupunKnight (talk · contribs) 20:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wiki9pedia's notability guidelines

1. Paraspace: PROD 20:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines; in fact it's difficult to find anything anywhere which uses the word "Paraspace" in this sense.
2. Lectora: PROD 19:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. (Still no independent sources after being tagged for sources for over 11 years!)
3. IDDEA: PROD 18:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence anywhere of notability. No citations to significant coverage in any independent reliable sources, and none found on searching either.
4. Diamante Azzura: PROD; notified KingAttack! (talk · contribs) 12:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. The article has been tagged for notability and sources for 9 months, and the creator has repeatedly been informed of the need for sources, but still has no suitable sources.

1. File:Jimmy Barry Army 1917.JPG: PROD 15:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: The copyright statement is inaccurate. It says "In America, public domain is extended for works 70 years from Publication if the artist is anonymous", but in fact the figure is 95 years from publication for works published 1924–63, as can be seen at List of countries' copyright lengths. This file is stated to have been published in 1943, which is less than 95 years ago.

1. ELS Language Centers: PROD 15:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability
2. Anant Kunte: PROD 18:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No suitable, reliable and independent, source has been provided, even after sources were requested months ago, both here and directly to the creator of the article. Nor have web searches provided suitable sources.

1. Tres Dias: PROD 22:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (The only independent source is a 4-sentence report of a meeting. Searches also failed to find reliable independent coverage.)
2. Startup Europe Week: PROD 20:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Neither the cited sources nor searches provide any significant coverage in reliable independent sources.
3. Rodd & Gunn: PROD 14:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to the company's own web site and a few news announcements.

1. Voice of Wits: PROD 23:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: An ordinary student radio station, with no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No significant independent coverage.

1. Design envelope: PROD 21:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, and no more than a dictionary definition. Also, I have searched, and been unable to find any substantial coverage of this concept anywhere.
2. Small Planet Institute: PROD 21:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. The references include sources by the founders of the "institute", pages on web sites run by them, pages promoting similar ideas but not actually mentioning the "Small Planet Institute", and so on, but nothing that is substantial coverage in an independent source.

1. Arya Dance Academy: PROD 09:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not notable. No independent sources cited, and no evidence of notability found on searching. Also unambiguously promotional.
2. WGCS: PROD 19:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable student radio station. Neither cited in the article nor found on searching is there any substantial coverage in independent sources. Almost all content is unsourced, most of it parochial and of no significance outside the sphere of the college.

1. Rick Sopher: PROD 20:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. None of the references is either a substantial coverage or an independent source, let alone both.
2. American Muslim Women's Empowerment Council: PROD 15:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: A substantially promotional article, created by a single-purpose account, which, despite being tagged for better sources for 9 months, has never had citations to substantial coverage in independent sources, nor have searches found such coverage.

1. File:Rishabh Mukati.jpg (log): PROD 22:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Personal photograph, used only by a vandal, now indefinitely blocked, in multiple copies of a hoax vanity page, now all deleted. Unlikely ever to have any legitimate use.

1. Hong Kong AIDS Foundation: PROD 21:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Almost entirely unsourced, and substantially promotional.

1. Minnesota Freedom Band: PROD 13:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. None of the cited references is substantial coverage in an independent source. (One of the sources has only a one sentence mention of the band.)

1. Nasir Yammama: PROD 15:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Despite the impressive looking number of references, they turn out to be mostly, if not all, press releases, articles in business promotion publications, and such like.

1. Hafiza Khatun: PROD 17:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Appallingly promotional, and also little if any evidence of notability. In effect almost unsourced, as most of the "references" are either not references for any content of the article, not about Hafiza Khatun, or both.

1. File:Share1.jpeg (log): PROD; notified Coolbland (talk · contribs) 20:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Personal photograph, currently unused, of an editor whose sole purpose here has been self-promotion. No likelihood of ever being any use for encyclopaedic purposes.
2. Jentezen Franklin: PROD 16:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The sources cited are a book by Franklin, his own web site, a dead link to a nonexistent page on the web site of a local newspaper, and a report of a speech that Franklin gave.
3. Everyone's a Robot: PROD; notified HarryLime1949 (talk · contribs) 12:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No indication of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to Facebook, YouTube IMDb, and an event finding site.
4. Cravingz: PROD 19:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

1. ESteem: PROD 13:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources at all. (Also largely promotional)
2. Aleksandr Mergold: PROD 19:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards
3. Game (Scientology): PROD 18:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of notability
4. GeoFreakZ: PROD; notified ADMRN9102 (talk · contribs) 13:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
5. Thomas Luke Msusa: PROD 10:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
6. Ramadhan Jalil: PROD; notified Manarianz5 (talk · contribs) 14:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: (1) This article is blatantly promotional in character. (2) There is insufficient evidence of notability for this amateur footballer.

1. Chris Foitel: PROD 15:36, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. None of the cited references is substantial coverage in an independent reliable source.
2. Shalu Shamu (actress): PROD; notified Kavitha.Syed (talk · contribs) 09:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of notability. The references are mostly about one incident, not giving substantial coverage of her. Several of them even refer to her in such terms as "small time Tamil actress", "playing a small role", etc.
3. Sekh Hemp: PROD 19:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources cited, and attempts to find sources have turned up nothing at all.
4. Juice Box: PROD 15:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. No independent sources cited, and nothing even vaguely appropriate found on searching.

1. Mehsopuria: PROD 14:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, either in the cited sources or anywhere else found on searching.
2. American School Dhahran: PROD 10:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
3. Dorset Eye: PROD 10:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Topic does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines
4. Village Crossing Shopping Center: PROD 14:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability

1. Paddywhack: PROD 16:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence to support the claims about the word "Paddywhack". Google searches produce almost entirely web sites copying this article, and no reliable sources.
2. DJ Sheizwood: PROD 16:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article
3. Septier Communication: PROD 12:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. No independent sources have ever been cited, despite tagging for notability for 9 years, and no significant independent coverage has been found on searching.
4. Rudebwoy Ranking: PROD 18:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced largely to download sites, promotional sites, etc

1. SlideIT: PROD 14:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability, and no sources provided. (Both of the cited "references" were published before SlideIT was created.)
2. Voicing Erasure project: PROD; notified Emily01755 (talk · contribs) 10:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Two of the three references don't mention the Voicing Erasure project, and the other is not an independent source, being on the web site of the organisation responsible for the project.

1. JoyTunes Recorder: PROD; notified Izkovsky (talk · contribs) 11:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notabilty guidelines

1. Emerson College Polling: PROD 18:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Formula SAE: PROD 06:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. All references but one are to the organisation's own material, and searching failed to produce anything of much value.
2. Wendy's Milk Bar: PROD 07:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. No independent sources have ever been cited, despite the article having been tagged for sources fof over twelve years.

1. Jessica Warner: PROD 14:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. (Unsourced except her own web site since 2007)
2. Luo script: PROD; notified Kefaombewa (talk · contribs) 12:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of notability. Still unsourced after being tagged fo sources and notability for eight years, & searches have failed to find coverage in reliable sources. (Article created by a COI SPA.)

1. Opendorse: PROD 21:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability
2. Sixten Korkman: BLP PROD; notified Misc Practice (talk · contribs) 13:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

1. Isaac Saviour: BLP PROD; notified King Ëddyøx (talk · contribs) 08:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
2. Mahasin al-Hawati: PROD 19:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

1. Charadupinnikkali: PROD 21:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. The article cites no sources except a dead link, and my searches have produced nothing but wikis and other unreliable sources, and one advertising web page.
2. Chinese luxury shopping behaviour: PROD 10:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Substantially a personal essay or reflection, almost all unsourced, and without any citation to any source which treats this concept as a subject in itself.

1. Principality of Snake Hill: PROD 20:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources do not give substantial coverage. No indication of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards.

1. Starkid: PROD 16:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines, either in cited sources or anywhere else found in searching
2. Elroy Salam: PROD 21:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the cited sources nor anything else indicates notability by Wikipedia's standards.
3. Flatsy doll: PROD; notified Collmar (talk · contribs) 17:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. The one so-called "reference" currently in the article doesn't even mention flatsy dolls, and another one in older versions of the article is a dead link.

1. Markstrat: PROD 21:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: A substantially promotional page, tagged as such since 2017, which has never had any references to independent sources, and for which significant coverage in independent sources has not been found on searching.
2. David Vélez: PROD 11:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources do not indicate notability by Wikipedia's standards.
3. Intercultural communication principles: PROD 14:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Very much more like a personal essay than an objective account. Multiple statements of opinion or judgements. Trying to clean it up, retaining only material citeable to objective statements in reliable sources would leave virtually nothing.

1. Vermaport: PROD 14:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article has never had references to significant coverage in independent sources, nor has any been found on searching. Does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. Diana Nyago: PROD; notified Yeko shanurah (talk · contribs) 20:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

1. EaseUS Partition Master: PROD 20:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources do not provide evidence of notability in Wikipedia's terms. (Created by an account which, apart from precisely 0 edits leading to autoconfirmation, was a single purpose account editing about the products of one company.)
2. EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard: PROD 20:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources do not provide evidence of notability in Wikipedia's terms. (Created by an account which, apart from precisely 0 edits leading to autoconfirmation, was a single purpose account editing about the products of one company.)

1. Ripon RUFC: PROD 13:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. No independent sources giving substantial coverage are cited, nor have I been able to find any. Also, since this is an ordinary low-level amateur sports club, it is not to be expected that it will satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
2. Keighley RUFC: PROD; notified 2010drsel (talk · contribs) 13:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. No independent sources giving substantial coverage are cited, nor have I been able to find any. Also, since this is an ordinary low-level amateur sports club, it is not to be expected that it will satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
3. Seamus Hasson: PROD; notified Sperrins (talk · contribs) 21:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Apart from a couple of announcements of his death, none of the references gi es any significant coverage of him.

1. Liberty Humane Society: PROD; notified Dunnemince (talk · contribs) 09:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The references in the article don't indicate notability in Wikipedia's terms, nor does anything else found on searching. (Also, the article has throughout its history been promotional in tone.)

1. Ricky Ray Butler: PROD 10:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Nothing to indicate satisfying the notability guidelines. Cited sources are all one or more of promotional, not significant coverage, not independent.

1. Musquiqui Chihying: PROD 19:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. None of the cited references is an independent source giving substantial coverage to this person.

1. YES (Education Center): PROD 10:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. All but one of the references merely briefly mentions "Yes", and the other one is on an advertising site (pro.rbc.ru).
2. Casa de Sante: PROD; notified A westman (talk · contribs) 21:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
3. Town Pump: PROD 20:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability
4. Bumble and bumble: PROD; notified Cathrynmc (talk · contribs) 20:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability
5. Christ School, Bangalore: PROD 15:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, promotional article without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines (created by hijacking an article on another school, but that one was no better, so reverting wouldn't achieve much)
6. Art Therapy Resources: PROD 08:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Wikipedia is not a directory.

1. Cardinal O'Connor Conference on Life: PROD; notified RHB333RHB (talk · contribs) 19:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Virtually every reference is unambiguously not independent, and scarcely an of them comes anywhere near to being substantial coverage.
2. Lee Bo-ik: PROD; notified Yuri Iluliaq (talk · contribs) 17:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Her only claim to sugnificance is being related to some famous people, the cited references are neither reliable sources nor substantial coverage, and nothing better has been found on searching.
3. Gaurishankar Chaubey: PROD; notified Anamika Vishwakarma 10 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Cited sources are mostly blatant promotion sites, also content on a web site associated with him, pages that barely mention him,or even don't mention him at all, etc...
4. PicturesToExe: PROD; notified Skalogryz (talk · contribs) 15:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Cited only to the company's website, and searching found no substantial coverage in any independent reliable source.

1. Delia Memorial School (Yuet Wah): PROD 20:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of notability. The article has never had any significant content, nor any references to anything other than the school's web site, despite being tagged for sources for over 13 years, and even that web site is now a dead link.
2. The Black Examiner: PROD; notified Abjine (talk · contribs) 20:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (References are two links to the newspaper's own web site, one to a mere list of titles, and two dead links, of which one was evidently a blog post, and the other apparently a list entry.)
3. Ravi Varma Adduri: PROD 21:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. None of the cited sources is substantial coverage of Ravi Varma Adduri, and all evidence indicates that he has only had fairly minor roles.
4. Prash Ladva: PROD 14:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. None of the references is substantial coverage in an independent source.

1. Anglian Learning: PROD 21:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Almost all of the references are either pages on the web sites of the business or the schools it owns or else mere listings on a government web site. The few exceptions are not substantial coverage.
2. Covered market in Nancy: PROD; notified Marg87 (talk · contribs) 23:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: The cited sources don't come near to showing that the subject satisfies the notability guidelines.

1. BIC Group Ltd: PROD 22:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines
2. Anabel Ternès: PROD 23:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There are references which don't mention her, or only briefly mention her, or are by her not about her, etc.
3. Club Quarters: PROD 21:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither in the article nor anywhere else found on searching is there any evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

1. The Divine Comedy (Smith): PROD; notified Maaaps (talk · contribs) 18:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The only reference in the article now, and as far as I can see the only one there has ever been, is an article by Traugott Rohner in "The Instrumentalist", which has just two single sentence mentions of this work.
2. Shane Cloete: PROD 19:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
3. Elena Goode: PROD 21:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. Currently sourced only to a dead link and IMDb, and past versions had no suitable sources either. Tagged for sources since 2017.
4. Jim Pope: PROD 19:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence at all of satisfying the notability guidelines. No sources at all cited, and no significant coverage in reliable sources found on searching.
5. Price monitoring: PROD 13:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: More like a personal essay than an objective article, distinctly promotional in tone, and content not fully supported by the references.

1. Makarand Narwekar: PROD 11:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. The cited sources aren't substantial coverage of him, and being a local councillor does not constitute notability.
2. Labroots: PROD 11:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. None of the cited references is substantial coverage in an independent source, nor was anything better found on searching.

1. Louis Geoffroy: PROD 08:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Unsourced, and searches have failed to find any substantial coverage.
2. Hełm wz. 2000: PROD 14:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines

1. Aleksandr Agapitov: PROD 22:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines; none of the references is substantial coverage of Agapitov in an independent source.
2. Cyberduck: PROD 10:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines: no independent sources cited at all, even after being tagged for sources for 12 years.

1. Antiquarian Horological Society: PROD; notified Horology (talk · contribs) 21:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neither the citations in the article nor anything found on searching indicates that the organisation satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Apart from a link to the society's listing on the UK charities register, the only reference is a book which is unlikely to contain substantial coverage of an organisation founded in 1953, as its title is "Clockmaking in Oxfordshire 1400–1850".)