User talk:RHaworth/2015 Oct 25

This is an archive of past discussions with User:RHaworth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Good afternoon Mr. RHaworth, At the end of May of this year you notified me User: CFHSPAO that you were going to remove the photos from all of the Surgeon General bios that I had uploaded - please see Canadian Surgeon General for the list of individual bios. I would like to know your reasoning behind removing the photographs. When I provided the information on them I listed them as the property of the Department of National Defence (DND) here in Canada and that authorization had been given to post them. I would really like to upload them again and have them stay put, so please tell me anything that I can possibly do in order to ensure that. Thank you so much for your time, I apologize for my lack of understanding of the Wikipedia procedures, I am still fairly new to the set-up and have not been able to fully grasp the ins and outs of certain things as of yet. — User: CFHSPAO 15:03, 23 September 2015

(talk page stalker) Unfortunately, we cannot accept copyrighted files with permission to post them here alone. We can only accept files which are licensed under one of the broader open-source licenses which permit re-use including commercial use and modification. Can you get such permission fron the DND? --Orange Mike | Talk 19:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

• "Remove the photos from all of the Surgeon General bios" - what an hopeless exaggeration. I totally deny saying any such thing. Provide links to my message if you claim different. I have deleted just one image which you had uploaded twice. If the image of Claude Auger from the DND is available with a {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} or compatible licence, then upload it to the Commons. If it is not available under such a licence then uploading as fair use is inapplicable - Condition 1 of this policy would clearly be violated: the guy died in 2006 - there is a very good chance that a free use equivalent could be found - talk to his family. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Rhaworth, You deleted two of my pages, namely User: A.S. Brown/Remilitarization of the Rhineland and User: A.S. Brown/Suez crisis under the grounds of copy-write violations. I did a few bit of work on those articles relating to those subjects, but since that time, other hands have changed the articles in directions that I find unwholesome. I just created those user pages to provide examples of how those pages should be out of the (probably vain) hope that other users might come around to my viewpoint. I took older, better copies of those pages and used them as the basis of the user pages to create example of how I think those pages should be, so if there are any copywrite violations, it would have been from the older copies of those articles. If there are copywrite vios, these are from the older pages I used, but regardless, if those pages are restored, I will more than happy to remove any copywrite vios. I would really like to have those pages restored so I can address your concerns. Thank you for your time, and please have a wonderful day! -- A.S. Brown (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

• Incidentally do your random scribblings on your user page serve any purpose? And be aware re one of the few times when you wrote anything coherent on the page, Amy may never see it but certainly one other person has seen it - me. As to your deleted pages, text emailed. Bear in mind that if you repost, JustBerry (talk · contribs) may just happen to see them again and take the same view. Also keeping a copy of a Wikipedia article in user space for too long can be considered a copyvio of the original article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Rhawoth Thank you for the e-mails. I will discuss this matter with JustBerry to see where he stands, and proceed from there. I was not aware of the time stipulation-certainly other users have kept copies of article in userspace for years-but I will bear it in mind. With all due respect, I don't believe I have to explain what I write on my userpage to anyone, but I suppose I should be flattened to find that there is somebody out there who has enough free time to concern themselves with that matter. But if you really must concern with matters that do not concern you, it was to bury things so that people like you would not read them-evidently not deep enough. But it does not matter anyway, it will all end under the northern lights. Thank you for your time. -- A.S. Brown (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Greetings Mr. Rhaworth, I see that you deleted the page for AWeber. I represent the company and would like to have the page restored as it provides historical information about our company. There are other email marketing companies whose pages exist still. If it's a matter of updating the page to remove non-factual/historical information, I'm happy to oblige. I would greatly appreciate your help in the matter. Thank you. Narolsonsd (talk · contribs) 14:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

I see that you removed an edit I made to another page regarding the deletion of the AWeber page. Can you please restore the page? It provides historical information about our company, similar to other email marketing companies (e.g., MailChimp, Constant Contact, GetResponse, etc.). I am happy to remove any content that is not appropriate. I would appreciate your help with this. Thanks. Narolsonsd (talk · contribs) 11:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• I reverted your edit to user_talk:rjd0060 because it had totally vandalised the page. There is no point in putting your message back properly because you received your reply at requests for undeletion. As to the AWeber page, kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Rhaworth, I see you have deleted some of my page. I would appreciate if I could get the chance to copypaste it, before you just delete without saying it to me. It is really important text that has taken MANY months for me to create. So please, if you could give me a chance to copypaste the text to my computer, it would save my life. Regards from JonasJepsen, 00:23, 26 September 2015 (CEST)

• It would help if you told me which page. Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I am talking about my own user page. You deleted my Odense Boldklub statistics and my New York Islanders team. If I could get the text back that you deleted, I would appreciate it. — JonasJepsen 13:46, 27 September 2015 (CEST).

• Did you see that the words read this above are a link? Follow that link and read. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

I have done that now. Now what? Can you e-mail me my deleted notes. Or do I misunderstand something? — JonasJepsen 19:29, 28 September 2015 (CEST).

• Emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Please restore my sandbox User:TrueHeartSusie3/Sandbox2 which you just deleted; JustBerry tagged it for deletion without realising that the page he claims I/Foster's current WP article plagiarize is a mirror site (http://www.fanpal.com/celeb/jodie+foster/ click 'read more' and scroll down and you will see Source: Wikipedia). I left a message about this on the sandbox's talk page, and it also showed up on the tag that I had contested the deletion; why on earth was this overlooked and my sandbox deleted?! — TrueHeartSusie3 (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

• TrueHeartSusie3, restored. You have been working on this for seven months and as far as I can see very few of your changes have been transferred to the live article. That smacks of using Wikipedia as a free host. What is your objection to working directly on the live article? At one level it does not matter how many edits you use to achieve a given result but I do recommend you to use "show preview" and "show changes" more and "save page" less. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring it! I've not been able to find time to fully concentrate on overhauling the article, and prefer to re-write entire sections in my sandbox before editing the live article. It's usually easier this way, as often a lot of content has to be deleted or completely changed, and I usually don't have time to edit a section in one go. I will try to use "show preview" more in the future though, thank you for the tip! TrueHeartSusie3 (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3

@TrueHeartSusie3: You may want to start a discussion on the article's talk page before making an overhaul like that to the mainspace. --JustBerry (talk) 11:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I'm making first steps on the Wikipedia and decided to translate page about WinToFlash from russian wiki to English, because, I believe, it must exists in English version too. This app is good too and has a millions of users worldwide and there is an article about other apps like this - UNetbootin, Fedore Live USB (all for Linux, not for Windows). I created big article with list of all options about this app (this app, so I need this), roadmap, facts, wine start, etc. What did I do wrong? Why did you decide it's ad page - there is no links to buy, download, or others; this is only a description.

Please help me to understand and make the article better, because I'm lost now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JahrA90 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

• I suspect you may have a COI. I did not feel that notability was established. So the best I can offer is deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I see this sounds oddly for me but maybe I'm missing something. Can we do this way: I improve my article in the sandbox (I have a copy on my PC) and ask you again to review again as a superior and experienced member or wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JahrA90 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

• Re-submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

This user Jay jay ey is removing the speedy deletion template from Vmoney inc and I suspect this user Jayson.ojeda is a sock account of user:Jay jay ey. As the article fails to meet WP:CORP where the sock user user:Jay jay ey kept removing the speedy tag on behalf of the master account user:Jayson.ojeda. I request you take look at the user's activities including the article. — ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 10:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

• User names should be bracketed with [[]] rather than '''. Page deleted sock blocked. Keep watching. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

I have requested an investigation into this sockpuppetery account, You may take look at Sockpuppet investigations/Jayson.ojeda and i need a checkuser to confirm whether both are accessed from same IP. Otherwise there will be risk in repeatedly removal of speedy deletion tags from this individual in the future. And If i used the bracket then that individual also will get notified with this regard where it will create unnecessary arguments here. ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 11:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

You actually forgot to block the master account? ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 11:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Do you use AWB? If so - Wikipedia:Database_reports/Unused_file_redirects could be cleared reasonably rapidly, rather then me doing a lot of semi-manual G6's? — Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

• I am thinking about it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Could you explain your rationale for the deletion of D4nny under A7? As far as I see, the article very much made a claim of notability, claiming as such because of his single "Goodbye", and also references the press coverage he had received. Please send me a copy of the article, if you can, so I can more efficiently examine the content. — Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 12:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

• Restored! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I was wondering as to specifically why you deleted my userpage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirugaki (talk • contribs) 18:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

• The content of your page might have been acceptable for an active Wikipedia editor but for someone who has done just eight useful edits and none in the last five months, it becomes a very distinct case of simply messing about, or to fit it to a standard criterion, using Wikipedia as a free host. Come back when you have done at least 80 useful edits and I might consider restoring. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm mjesfahani and I say a great mistake you deleted that supermoon's photo!!! I took it with my own personal telescope bought in institute "Aseman e shab" in Tehran - Iran and it was my own work. believe it or not. I haven't told a lie in my whole life dear. — 2.147.233.6 (talk) 04:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC) mjesfahani

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

It has seemingly been pointed out by some other contributors, that the deletion of file redirects isn't in fact "uncontroversial housekeeping". It would be appreciated if you could restore the redirects concerned (assuming other criteria) don't apply, until there is a fuller discussion about this matter. Request at WP:REFUND. — Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

• These redirects were doing no harm. But now they have been deleted, there is absolutely no point in restoring them because they serve no useful purpose. The specific example you quote was a classic case of an implausible redirect resulting from a typo ("illusrated") and fully qualified for speedy deletion. It had been viewed just twice during 2015 Aug. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. But the technical concern is expressed in the WP:AN thread where you've already commented. — Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

This image allows non-commercial Reproduction. Please withdraw your objection. http://pm.gc.ca/eng/important-notices#Copyright Non-commercial Reproduction — Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 03:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

• There is no need to copy&paste (badly) stuff from the gc.ca website - I am quite capable of following a link. Please follow this link and read. Quite simply, we do not allow the non-commercial clause. Images must have a {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} or compatible licence and be uploaded to the Commons. Uploading as fair use is inapplicable - Condition 1 of this policy would clearly be violated. There is a very good chance that a free use equivalent can be found - talk to his party office. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

A page you deleted has been recreated as Sarah Hamilton (English artist), and is still not notable! — Edwardx (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

• I did not feel it is bad enough to speedy. If you think it is bad enough, put it through one of the deletion processes. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Recreation of salted page with a small randhawa instead of Guru Randhawa. -- The Amazing Spiderman (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

• Actioned. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, can you please recover this page? Thanks! Liberal Humanist (talk) 05:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

• What are you playing at? I restored it and then you request its deletion again. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Please Roll Back My Deleted Page (RHaworth). — UMZH 09:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zopic Hadisk (talk • contribs)

• Which is more important: to decorate your message with a pointless image or provide a link to the page you want "rolled back". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm confused. I thought a PROD was supposed to last 7 days? — Adam9007 (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

• I invoke the snowball clause. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth, you deleted my page this morning because of copyrights, I'll recreate the page without the problem of copy paste. Please contact me before delete my pages then I could fix the problem. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastien Gtrx (talk • contribs) 13:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

• I think you have your answer by now. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I see you were the deleting admin for Abubakar Usman. Recently, Abubakar_Usman_HCE was created by User:Hausacybers. Even though I understand that by deleting a page, the user's contributions for that page are consequently deleted as well, would there be a way you can check if the creation made for Abubakar Usman were also done by Hausacybers? I'm trying to see if there might be socks present. Ping upon reply. --JustBerry (talk) 19:44, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

• Sock confirmed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

why do you delete sir. please activate shliftop page. I want to write the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narayana shankara (talk • contribs) 06:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who a) has half an idea of how to write a user talk mesaage and b) has no COI, thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. Also I recommend you change the name of the company - I think others with crude minds are likelt to read it as ShitFlop. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate that as they are a staff-member of WMUK you could think that User:Battleofalma has a 'background' but this is a user with under 400 edits, who works in an office where the only editor with experience is my husband. You can see that from their 'Staff page'. Nobody is compelled to help new people but let's not bite. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 10:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

• Far from criticising me, you should be thanking me for explaining that the contribution would be OK elsewhere - I could have simply deleted the page.

Battleofalma, did you consider it biting? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

• "Biting"? Not too badly, but admittedly not very helpful either and scolding is hardly necessary. I admit that I made a mistake and should've put it in namespace (it's aggregating some work for an editathon and a brand new editor) and would've moved it given a bit longer.

I understand it must be a bit tiresome but a little more leeway would've been appreciated. While I can't be scared off from editing because I devote too much of my time to Wikimedia to just give up, plenty of others could be quite easily. We all want to maintain and grow editorship, we'll do that with friendliness, beyond just bare minimum civility. Thanks, Battleofalma (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Apologies. I shall bear your comments in mind. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Mr. RHaworth If this page was deleted and we did our best effort to provide information to you and support the reason to comment why the content is worthy to continue editing but you don't have anything to add to the previous comment, what should we do? How can we continue this page and get the whole information posted before? Could you please consider and activate the speedy contest option so that we can explain more! Thanks again, Luislaaglobal (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

• I have nothing to add to the reply I gave you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Why are you deleted it? I'm not finished yet. Please reply, User talk:Materialtechnology —Preceding undated comment added 08:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

• So if it is not finished, don't put it in mainspace! Submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

New user Holy islamic state of the Germanic Nation at least seems to be against WP:ISU, but what about WP:IU? In the article they created, File:Viking towns of Scandinavia.jpg has the caption "Muslims towns of Scandinavia". -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

• Sam, what is wrong with letting this user know that we are talking about them? After careful consideration I have decided that the name is sufficiently outrageous that no-one would think it was a group. If you disagree, seek other channels such as AN. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Re this guy: hello, the above page was speedily deleted. I'm afraid wrongly on the matter of significance. I believe, the gentleman deserves to be on Wikipedia owing to his economic acumen, philanthropy and academics. He is a senior academician and budding politician. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okelloha (talk • contribs) 12:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• Okelloha, kindly have the decency to wait until someone who: < knows how to create wikilinks and to leave a talk page message, does not shout, knows what a Wikipedia article should look like and has no COI > thinks the guy is notable and writes about him. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Roger. I see you were the last administrator to delete MyAnimeList, which I believe is currently salted as well. I have drafted a new version at User:Arsonal/MyAnimeList and would like you to review it so that this new version can be moved into the mainspace. Alternatively, let me know if you feel it should be escalated to DRV. —Arsonal (talk + contribs)— 04:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

• Don't bother with DRV - just submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey RHaworth, I was the one that had created the i-exceed technology solutions. Eekster has left a comment that stated under speedy deletion 11 clause, it could be rewritten to be more encyclopedic in nature. This isn't the first time I'm trying to create a page. I seem to be following all your guidelines as much as possible, but it still gets flagged as advertising or not notable enough. As far as my understanding goes...our references are third party links from sources that have been in the industry for over a decade or more. Could you please give me some cues on how I could create a page that does not violate your guidelines? — Ffrewin (talk) 11:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

• I see that you have now remembered draft:i-exceed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth! You removed a Wiki article I was recently working on called draft:Church of the Holy Spirit. I understand that I violated some copyright rules by taking information straight from the church's website. I'll dig deeper into how to communicate and source the content from other locations. I would really love to get access to that content if only for my own records. I intended to make significant changes to the article anyways. In my Wiki inexperience, I submitted it for approval before it was complete. My apologies! Do you have the ability to retrieve the latest draft for me? Thanks. Tyler — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylersanthony (talk • contribs) 21:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

• Please learn wikilinks. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Mr. RHaworth. I'm interested in creating Mord Fustang and I see that you're the first of four admins to have deleted it in the past. Before (if) I begin, could you tell me a bit more about why the page was removed? — CollinGeyso (talk) 22:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

• Please learn wikilinks. So what more information do you need than is provided in the deletion log entries? True they should have included a link to the AfD discussion but you could have found it for yourself. If you can show that he has become notable in the last four years, submit an article via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! This is what I was looking for. And sorry about the incorrect link. I'm still trying to learn wikilinks. Collin Geyso^TALK 21:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For wielding the mop and bucket to clear out things requiring deletion, often without thanks. — Fiddle Faddle 11:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

I second that. I dare not think what state CAT:CSD would be in if you weren't around. Thank you. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I'm reviewing an AfC page Draft:Piano rock which seems acceptable but it is locked after a 2009 AfD and wanted you to see if the current page looks better. Also notifying Cirt, Gilliam and Safiel. — SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Strongly suggest formatting all cites with all possible fields in WP:CIT templates; will make it easier to evaluate. Good luck, — Cirt (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

• Two states emailed, to both of which I would probably have said "keep" at their AfD discussions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Roger and the draft certainly seems like an improvement but I also meant is that I can't move the page to acception because it is page creation-protected (one of the unfortunate things of not being an admin). SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

• Now moved. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team! This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list. — MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion of File:Professor Jason Pomeroy, Founding Principal of Pomeroy Studio.jpg. Hey there, Haworth! It seems the copyright holder of this image has thought about it, and would now like to release it under a suitable license after all (see VRTS ticket # 2015080810010495: CC-BY-SA 4.0. Can you undelete for me please? Ping me with any questions or concerns. Thank you! KDS4444^Talk 23:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

• Why do you need a ping? If you leave a message, you should be prepared to watch for a reply for say 48 hours. Instruct Ojellerton (talk · contribs) to upload it to the Commons and link to the OTRS ticket there. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

I ask for a ping in case I do not remember to check every message I leave— I only just now noticed the above message from you because you did not ping me. I didn't consider the request to be a burden, I considered it a polite way for me to make sure I don't lose track of the sometimes-large number of tickets I try to handle— and I assume that if I don't get a ping, that everything is fine and that you had no questions or concerns. Here, you instruct me to instruct Ojellerton to perform a second upload of an image and to link it to the corresponding ticket. He got notified of this because you mentioned his username in your message. I did not. I am still not sure why you didn't undelete the original file (?). Having the user re-upload the file, presumably under a different file name, might have seemed like someone circumventing your role as the authority who decided it should be deleted, and I would not have done that (though I guess I will from now on...?). I always contact the deleting admin and request undeletion so that the admin has the chance to review the OTRS ticket and verify that my request is well-founded— and to disagree with that request and explain why, if he/ she prefers. Now, I am at a loss... And was unpinged, even though I specifically asked for it, so I never knew what happened (eventually I got another message on this matter through OTRS, which brought me back here). If I am doing any part of this wrong, could you explain? Thank you (no ping asked for and so none expected). KDS4444^Talk 20:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

• KDS4444, OK pings are cheap so you can have one. Try not to be so long winded. I thought my message made it clear: I have no objection to the file being put back but for me to restore it and then transfer it to Commons seems a waste of effort. Why could not it be uploaded direct to Commons? "Presumably under a different file name" - why do you presume that? What would be wrong with their using the same name? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Dear colleague, I was relieved to see the responsible tone of your recent talk, bcz i came here expecting to urge you to reconsider executing speedies, in light of the presumable miscarriage of process re Privateering. My attention had been solicited bcz it turns out i created it as an Rdr to Privateer) back in the Dark Ages (during which we seem to have signed up around the same time). That notice was to the point, bcz a bit over 1000 articles were reasonably relying on an appropriate article or Rdr. Presumably they did so bcz their editors agreed with me that it should be either an article or Rdr appropriate for the common-noun sense (or at worst a Dab including it) -- tho presumably virtually none of them bothered to confirm that it was.

I don't recall what the guidance is for those who execute the speedies, but i'd have hoped that viewing the edit history was near the top of the to do list. On the other hand, i don't recall the last time i executed one, and perhaps all i really need to hear is "That kind of attention to detail would be great, if there were more admins sharing the load." Thanks for your attention. -- Jerzy•t 00:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

• What an hopelessly long winded way of telling me that I goofed over a deletion. You fixed it. Thank you. "That kind of attention …" is exactly my feelings. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Thread transferred to User talk:Mjesfahani.

Hello, I would like to deliver my thanks to you for proceeding to delete Template:Running Man 2016 which I CSDed with Twinkle. Because it's my first time tagging pages for deletion, I have 2 questions.

1. Did I CSD it correctly?
2. Is it that when articles are tagged with CSD, PROD etc, they will be listed in a category or some sort of groupings which will be visible to deleting admins?

And, while at it, why not take a look at List of Running Man missions in 2016 which I PRODed too? Thanks! −Edward (^t⋇_c) 09:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

• The speedy tag was perfectly correct. Tagged articles are listed in CAT:CSD and CAT:ALLPROD and these lists are visible to everybody. Regarding the prod: the article listed the 2015 missions but there was this full set of 2016 missions lurking in the guy's sandbox (now merged in). Is this 2016 list genuine - implying that they have already recorded more than twenty episodes or is it fantasy? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, it gives me more confidence for my future possible taggings. For the PROD, I was a bit confused with the revision history, perhaps it was due to the merge..... But I can confirm that the full set of 2016 missions you linked are definitely fantasies. All known recorded episodes can be seen here supported with references of non-English language. I also saw that you had deleted the 2015 data after the merge, but I still think it's too early to be created, as there're 2 more months to go for 2015 and it won't have any new data until next year if the production does continue. Regards. −Edward (^t⋇_c) 08:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I see you've put a protection log on the page for Utkarsh Patel. I've been creating stubs for Indian cricketers, and there's an individual with the same name. I've created the draft in my sandbox. Please can you move this into the article space? Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 16:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

• If you really think a stub that short is ready for publication, see what the AfC reviewers think. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Well thanks for your help. Hats off to you. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

For info Haworth, I've now created it with the disambig in the title. Thankfully our rules on notability trump the pithy unhelpful comments of someone's whim. — Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Now you're being disruptive. If you can point me to the policy for a minimum length of an article, I'd be happy to move it back to draft. Oh wait, there isn't one, is there? — Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• True, there are no rules about article length. However there are plenty of rules about notability, such as "multiple independent sources". I feel you have done a minimum of effort in creating the article and made negligible attempt to show notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Take it to AfD then. Along with all of these articles too. — Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why the article should be moved to draft or deleted. It's a valid stub with a credible claim of significance and if Its notability is in doubt, WP:AfD might be appropriate but I don't see the article as a candidate for WP:AfD. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I would like the words of what it said. — — Preceding unsigned comment added by LinksMC (talk • contribs) 00:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

It took days for me to write that please copy and paste the words to … — Preceding unsigned comment added by LinksMC (talk • contribs) 00:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• Emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Category:British_monarchists. -- Softlavender (talk) 10:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• I join you in sighing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

You previously deleted this page as a disruptive nomination by the user link. Therefore, notifying you of a WP:DUCK sock investigation of that account, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TekkenJinKazama. Admin action would be appreciated to stop the disruption of Wikipedia's quality review processes including WP:FAC, WP:FLC, and WP:GAN. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 00:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

• Has been dealt with. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

How do I make a "credible claim of significance" for an article (see the heading for link)? Sounds like a pretty arbitrary / subjective process depending on who gets to in the end make that judgement. Would for instance an external news article (in this case about the website&tv show hybe.com) be enough to make such claim? Cheers. -- Incredibleindividual (talk) 11:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

• Incredibleindividual, true there is always a certain measure of arbitrariness about Wikipedia inclusion decisions but there are certain minimum standards that must be reached and your article fell far short of these standards. Read these notes and then kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

What happened to my user page? That was mine and not a Wikipedia article. You can't delete my page with data I've been working on and saving. How do I get that data back? How do you undelete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rick lay95 (talk • contribs)

User has added {{administrator}} to their page. What to do? — Jared Preston (talk) 13:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

• Jared Preston, so what was preventing you from doing edit? Please reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

You're an admin here. I'm not. Sure I could have done the edit in question, I just didn't want to get into an edit war and/or edit someone else's userpage. Yes, I could have reported it then had my edit been reverted, but it doesn't really matter much now. Jared Preston (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

• You are on such solid ground in removing an invalid admin tag that anyone trying to revert your edit would be treated as a vandal. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

You deleted my page without reading the talk reference. Not cool! Marko Albrecht - Producer. My notes clearly listed as why it shouldn't be speedily deleted. You need to read the notes before doing that!! I said it would be all completed within 48 hours. Undelete ASAP. Thank you. Alexkogl (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

• But the talk page stated explicitly why it should be deleted. You said "it is a place holder". But Wikipedia does not do placeholders. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I note that the Beme page is salted. There were a number of ships named SS Beme, which is a valid target for Beme. I understand the reasons behind the salting of Beme. Would it be in order to create the page as a dab page, and then lock it for editing at Admin level? Mjroots (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• A straight redirect seems better for the time being. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Can you please restore Draft:Alex Gilbert or at least give me the source so I can improve on this. I am allowed to Draft this up and work on this. I would like this at User:DmitryPopovRU/Draft:Alex Gilbert Thanks Dmitry -- DmitryPopovRU (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• I see you have recreated it anyway. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Good Day, Criminal activity from APHAIA. We have encountered criminal activity from an editor for wiki and also an owner of major Hollywood celebrity websites. He manipulates the content to profit and control traffic. We have contributed substantial content and he has tampered with it from both the wiki side and his websites. I do not know how to have this criminal activity investigated. — Redcarpetpress (talk) 05:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• Redcarpetpress, there has never been any user APHAIA (talk · contribs) and I cannot see any substantial content contributed by you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Why was the page deleted. I was working on the history of it . I am the founder and current ceo of the company. Naeem Haq — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.42.46.98 (talk) 08:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Can you please explain ? Should I start a new one ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.42.46.98 (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Why was my sandbox deleted? This was my page with saved data for future projects. What happened? How do I get it back? I just realized this is the 2nd time this has happened from you. Please restore it, again. Or at least tell me how to do it so I can get my data and projects back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rick lay95 (talk • contribs)

Please. why did you delete my colin maier article. I wasn't finished yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilo-echo-lima-victor-india-november (talk • contribs) 11:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• Kelvin, please, why did you try developing the article in mainspace? Work in a sandbox until it is ready. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

SearchShip was a page that i have twice created; at first i just created it and that was it ... came back months later to see it and saw it was not there; so i re-created it ... then i checked back 12 hours later and saw that it was gone. So now i know i need an article to cite ... and that is about it. Would it be sufficient to point at the statistics behind how much it improves searching in Google? — (MattiPerd (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC))

• MattiPerd, I see no evidence of any version months ago. Also was it advertising a piece of software or merely describing advanced query syntax for search engines? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey Rog, would you mind moving EuroNation 1 London, Beast of Bozrah, Jack Robichaux (deleted version) and Ciarán Dunphy to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia? I also notice The Background of an Academy Student but am unsure of its age? Thanks in advance, SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

The same can go for Chaozhouxieye please. TheGGoose (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

• Beast of Bozrah survived for six hours and The Background of an Academy Student for just five minutes. Others restored and moved. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, please delete file File:220px-Phantom-Afghan-Jalebi-cover.jpg. It is fair use non-fee image not used in any article currently, the article has been deleted. Thank you. -- Human3015^TALK  07:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

• Don't waste your time asking me - slap {{db-author}} on it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Please publish the article named Hari Kishore Joshi ... i will be very thankful for this .... — Hari Kishore Joshi (talk) 05:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is neither a free host nor a social networking site. Publish in FaceBook or your own website. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Why you deleted the page of Narendra mohapatra kindly please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debendra151 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• Which bit of the deletion log entries do you not understand? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Transferred to user talk:SidelinedAV8R

I just saw your speedy deletion of this article. Can I ask you to reconsider? I'm not sure that you looked properly at the article history. It may have been better to revert the article to a previous version. It has been around for many years as a substantial article. This edit in particular may be a good point to revert to as it appears to have cleaned up uncited material. Since that point much OR was added, it was then stubbed as being OR, and that is the point at which you deleted it. On a technical point, it does not make A3, since even as a stub it tells me two facts that aren't in the title, A7 does not apply since it a caste is not an organisaiton. As for A11 that is dubious at best; besides the sources that were in previous versions I can find a multiple page entry in The Tribes and Castes of Bombay, Volume 1 and there also appears to be a substantial article in Journal of the Anthropological Society of Bombay although I've only got snippet view for that. Just on a very cursory search, there appears to be much more. — SpinningSpark 13:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I am seeing that you have contested several of my changes to a Wikipedia page for musician, Craig Chaquico. I am his artist manager, and he has asked me to go in and update his page. I have done the best that I can so far, but am continuing to learn more about the proper ways to add information. Believe me, though, all of the information I have edited is factual and accurate. One notice that you have requested to be deleted is about Craig's signature guitar, which is a Kiesel Carving Signature CC275. That is the guitar that was built especially for him, and that he has been using, and they have been providing to interested buyers for almost 20 years. I switched out a reference to "Gibson" which is not what he has played for over 20 years; this was incorrect. I replaced it with his signature guitar. I did try to link this to a website page for verification. This is not to advertise, but to verify that what I put up there was accurate. Please help me to improve this if there is a way you feel it could be done more correctly. But please do not tag it to come down as what was up there before was simply wrong. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by PilotRock61 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make sure you comply with the rules there. "Contested several of my changes" - what on earth are you talking about? Sure, I deleted this pointless stub but I have never touched the Craig Chaquico article itself. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

A page I put up as a AFD but then withdrawed-needs to be closed sometime. Francisco Santos (footballer) - I put an AFD up then I looked over the history and realized that in fact it was vandalized. (Which I usually look over first but didn't this time), so yeah it needs to be closed and the original needs to go back up for it! — Wgolf (talk) 22:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker)  Done I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco Santos (footballer) as "withdrawn" and started a discussion on Talk:Francisco Santos (footballer) on what to do with the "hijacked version" edits. Iping'd both participants of the AFD (one of them had recommended splitting the page's history to handle the hijacked version). I also re-created the redirect that was left over from an earlier page move, Francisco Santos (Portuguese footballer), which RHaworth deleted on August 4, 2015. Oh, I also hat-noted both this player and the player from Brazil with a similar name. — davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

• So why did this need my attention? Why could you not have done what davidwr did? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for deleting it. Sorry about the fuss this caused. — AppliedStatistics (talk) 09:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

• Fuss? What fuss? Just a routine bit of tidying. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)