User talk:RHaworth/2018 Aug 03

This is an archive of past discussions with User:RHaworth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives
Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Hi Mr. Haworth, I request the undeletion of the page Draft: Dry Eye. The copyright infringement to which you referred no longer exists. Thanks, Knujon Knujon (talk) 20:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

• Don't be ridiculous. Massive copyvio. In any case your piece was simply not an encyclopedia article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Haworth, Can you please recommend how the page could be changed to qualify as an encyclopedia article? As for the copyvio, the link to which you originally referred as the violation was hosted at my request while I converted the content to Wikipedia formatting. The owners of that site can verify this fact if you'd like. Thanks, Knujon (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

• Why point to draft talk:Dry Eye when you mean the draft page itself? Multiple articles on the same topic are not allowed so go to talk:dry eye syndrome and ask how your not-a-copyvio article could be changed to qualify as a replacement for the existing article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, The deletion log shows that you did the deletion of the Xometry on 10 Feb. 2018. I am not sure of the original circumstances of the deletion, but the company has grown and is now the largest custom manufacturing platform in the US. It recently acquired its major competitor and raised an additional $25 MM for growth.

You can read about this in the Wall St. Journal, Lexington Herald Leader, American Inno and many other publications. What would be the right next step to permit the creation of the page? — Aaron, preceding unsigned comment added by 151.181.228.194 (talk) 22:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

• Next step for you is to do nothing. Wait until someone who has no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks RHaworth. It says in the log that the page is locked and page creation requires administrator access (see here: Xometry). So if someone without CoI wants to create a page, how would they do it if admin status is required to access? I appreciate your help! -Aaron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.100.63.74 (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

• By submitting as a draft via AfC. If the draft were to be accepted, then unprotection of the mainspace title would be uncontroversial. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to retrieve the text of the deleted page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:China_Literature_Ltd or if possible, restore the page. It is written as factually and objectively as possible as required for listed companies and provides the relevant citations. Please inform me of any changes required to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Thank you. Webnovel (talk) 05:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

• That has got to be one of the kinkiest bits of markup ever: to pipe a valid wikilink to the corresponding URL! Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

I have updated my email. Webnovel (talk) 00:03, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

• Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Thread transferred to user:Tyw7#noinclude !!

Hi, could you please restore Draft:Rigby's Water World (which you just deleted citing G4) which was restored by my Wp:refund request a few days ago. Right it was AFDd when in main space before but i am trying to develop it. Happy to discuss situation further if you want, and/or you could look at refund request discussion in history there. — Doncram (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

• Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I was working on a page for my company however my page was removed because my username was my company's name "My Financial." Since then, I have created a new account "cwalkertexas." I still wish to create a page for my company/employer, but when I created the page, I saw the note saying that I should contact you first. The page was titled My Financial and I am not sure how to provide you the link as it was deleted and I am new to writing Wikipedia articles. My name is Chris Walker and my username is Cwalkertexas Thank you, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwalkertexas (talk • contribs) 16:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Cwalkertexas: What was the name of the article? I do not find either an article named My Financial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) or a user named My Financial (talk · contribs). — C.Fred (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@C.Fred: He was User:Myfinancial, and the page Draft:My Financial. — Cryptic 21:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, could you restore Talk:Pray for Rosemary's Baby, please? It was deleted as "talk page of a redirect", but there's no reason a redirect page should not have a talk page, particularly here, where it had content, in this case a discussion of why the redirect should not be speedily deleted. TJRC (talk) 22:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

The article which i wanted to prove to people that anything thats fake on the internet can give you ideas. Im really new to this wikipedia thing but um..i was wondering why my article was deleted and if there was any other problems. I can fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Science. And. Spirits (talk • contribs) 23:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

• It is impossible to tell from your message what you are talking about but I will tell you anyway that hoaxes and false information are not allowed anywhere in Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello. In 2016 you G11ed TAC Security Solutions, which has also been G11ed and A7ed by other admins. It's also been G11ed and A7ed as TAC Security. It's back as Tac security, but of course I can't check if it's a recreation of the text of the deleted pages. I suspect it's a G11 anyway, but if the same text was G11ed that'll save time.

Also, exactly the same article text appears at Draft:TAC Security, curiously created by a different user, but I'm sure nothing dodgy's going on there. :-/ Pinkbeast (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

I'll take that as a yes. Thanks. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Dear RHaworth, I am asking that you stop the vandalizing of my pages or uploading image block help from bullies user name user:Guanaco and user:Adam9007 they are attacking my page I work hard on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrybear8648 (talk • contribs)

• Terry, we will keep this discussion on your talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Please would you kindly review a revisited edit of the Draft:Timely software page for creation? Our references should now be all correctly labelled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemoryAI (talk • contribs) 11:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• I see no revisited (or even revised) edit to review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello R. Haworth, I believe that you may have deleted a photograph of my father E.O.J. Westphal from his wikipedia page, and I am not clear why it was suitable for speedy deletion. I own the only original paper photographic copy of the image, and I am not sure what to do to make it available. Regards, Jonathan Westphal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewikibeagles (talk • contribs) 13:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Jonathan, I have sent an email to a gmail address for you that I found on the web. Do not take any action here until you have read that email. If you have not received it, read this.

I appreciate that it is difficult to persuade a philosopher to descend to the fine detail required for Wikipedia contributions but you need to try. Your message above lacked a heading, link/s to what you were talking about and a signature. Your upload of PoF.tiff had a very poor name, was uncropped, upside down (at least that is how it looks in the image description but curiously it is right way up when you use it) and, worst of all, a massive 24M bytes in size. Note that my replacement is one hundredth the file size!

PDF format is a wrapper for multiple formats. It should never be used for wiki uploads. I note that Jonathan Westphal.pdf is a PDF and I am amazed to find that it can be used in articles. I deleted Prof. E.O.J. Westphal with Students.pdf simply because it was a PDF. Someone else deleted Prof. E.O.J. Westphal with Students.jpg because "evidence will be provided on request" is not good enough.

Do feel free to try again. Upload the image as a JPG to the Commons and give it a decent image description instead of your slovenly one. I suggest the following:

{{en|1={{w|Ernst Oswald Johannes Westphal}} (centre) with some students of the School of African studies at the {{w|University of Cape Town}} seen here on the campus. Westphal was Professor of African Languages at the school from 1962 until his retirement in 1984.}}
{{af|1=''the above repeated in Afrikaans''}}

Add an exact date if possible. This text is intended to go in the |description= field of the {{information}} box. The text should be copied from the rendered version of this message, ie. as it appears on your browser's screen, into an edit box on the Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Sir, As I was asked to add reference which talks about article, I added just wanted to know the reason to delete this article I am independent article writer and wanted to contribute the right information about this college. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakashbs2018 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

• I have no idea what you are talking about. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

You misplaced the article at Draft:Draft:Nixtun Ch'ich'. Should be OK now. Kleuske (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Any objections to me restoring this article? Another user already posted on the talk page opposing the deletion, and it looks to me like there's plenty of sources that demonstrate notability. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

• Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

		The Winnowing Fan Barnstar
		For tireless work dealing with promo editors and reviewing articles tagged for speedy deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Cheers! —PaleoNeonate – 20:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, would you be able to restore Draft:Seasideness? Cheers! – Uanfala (talk) 09:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

@Uanfala:  Done --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

How do you delete G13 pages so fast? Are you just really quick or do you have some sort of a script that you use for it (not meaning to refer to Twinkle)? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

• So why not refer to Twinkle? When I am in CAT:CSD near the top of the page I see a row of links starting with "category   talk   edit this page   history". The last of these links is "d-batch". It is that what does it and blisteringly fast! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

I just realize most (including myself) use Twinkle and was wondering if you were doing something else, that is why I said that. As for d-batch, I have never tried that before. I shall have to look into it, thanks for the suggestion! --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth: It has come to my attention that fellow Wikipedian Kristina Millona's article Kristian_Ranđelović has been deleted for "unambiguous copyright infringement". We would like this article reverted back to active and existing so that we can continue to work on it. The article has only been up a very short time and was not finished. If it is possible to at least send me the text and references so that I can help Kristina with the writing, that would be great. She does significant work creating articles on notable LGBTQ+ activists and issues in the Balkans and the Wikimedia LGBT+ community supports her work. Thank you. Sincerely, RachelWex Wikimedia Support and Safety Team Member

• A member of the Support and Safety Team ought to know how to create wikilinks. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

You Are Responsible For INAPPROPRIATE DELETION OF A USER SANDBOX PAGE. Revert your actions. CONCERNED WIKIPEDIA PAGE: User:AnotherHomoSapein/sandbox

RHaworth, You have DELETED A SANDBOX PAGE (OF [Wikipedia]User:AnotherHomoSapein) SAYING THAT THE PAGE REFLECTED "UNAMBIGUOUS ADVERTISING OR PROMOTION". SANDBOX PAGES ARE JUST FOR THE PRACTICE OF THE WIKIPEDIA EDITORS AND ARE NOT WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES. The creator of the sandbox page left a message on the talk page of the page you deleted before your actions: "Not to be taken otherwise, the sandbox page is purely for practicing editing in Wikipedia and does not intend to become a proper Wikipedia article anytime soon.". According to the Wikipedia consensus, such actions DISCOURAGE NEW WIKIPEDIA EDITORS.
Revert your actions immediately. — AnotherHomoSapein (talk) 06:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC) @AnotherHomoSapein:

• While it is unfortunate that it may discourage new editors, using Wikipedia for advertising purposes is not permitted anywhere - even in sandboxes. The same goes for using Wikipedia as a webhost. If you believe that this was done in error and it cannot be resolved through discussion here, filing a deletion review is the appropriate route to take. -- TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

• Shouting and excessive use of bold - message ignored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I have got written permission from PranicKolkata.com to upload their content to Wikipedia. Can you reupload the article please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alltheory (talk • contribs) 11:50, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

• Which article? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth! Wikipedia asks me to contact the person who removed the article, and that's you. I would like to re-create the following page Draft:Flexaspect but I'm not sure how to better proceed. Please advise. Thanks in advance. LacroPower (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

• You seem to have forgotten my previous reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

True, I didn't see it at all, thanks! Speaking of the Col, my boss asked me to create a company Wiki page. I registered an account using our corporate email domain and this is probably making you think I'm somehow interested in any kind of promotion, which is not true. Will it be better if I re-create it using my personal Wiki account? - LACROPOWER (talk) 06:59, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

• So why are you speaking of the col? What has it got to do with this discussion? Please reply. The wiki view is that writing about your company is promotion. It does not matter how neutral the language is: because you are doing it, it is promotion. Please give up. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Muse Sleep. Hi, I would like to know how to retrieve and rewrite this article. I am writing this not for promotion reasons what so ever but just to inform. How can I make it not sound promotional as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coconn10 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. Also read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I was about to create a page for Roza Calderon but when I searched her name it said one was already created and deleted. I have never creates a wiki page before, so I was hoping I could finish what you had started. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Politiconorcal (talk • contribs) 22:56, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@Politiconorcal:  Done. Restored per your request. You can find it here --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth. You deleted this page per WP:G7, but I'm wondering if that means that the article was approved as a WP:GA. An editor added {{Good article}} with this edit here, but I can't find any record of a recent GA review. So, I am wondering if there's a connection between the deletion of this page and the upgrade in status. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

• Replied at User talk:Fhsig13#Despacito. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please undelete Draft: Trần Nguyễn Ngọc Trang. I do not know how to write on Wiki. But it is so appreciated if you can help to improve and contribute to my article. Can you help to retrieve? — Bích Liên 1571 (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)!

Please undelete Draft: 1001 jobs for modern women - Key to success. I do not know how to write on Wiki as well for this article. But it is so appreciated if you can help to improve and contribute to my article. Can you help to retrieve? — Bích Liên 1571 (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)!

• Wikipedia does not accept advertising. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Dear User:RHaworth, Today(27.07.2018) my article Draft:Columbery was deleted by you. You said that this page promotes the service I have written about. But in my oppinion this page is not unambiguously promotional, because there is no subjective sentences or ideas. All of facts of this article are proved by references. I am sure that it is written independent like an encyclopedia article. This article does not break Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, especially section G11. This page is built like other articles of travel technology services that are available on Wikipedia. Threre is no reasons to ban or delete it. I would be very pleased if you have reloaded my article. Kindest Regards, Dmytro Buhaiov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Дмитрий Бугаев (talk • contribs) 14:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Дмитрий Бугаев: It used subjective terms like "first ever" and "world's leading supplier". However, it isn't the individual sentences that are the problem. The entire draft is devoted to touting the benefits of the services the company offers. Even using neutral language, it is still an advertisement. And you need to disclose your association with the company. If the company is compensating you, you must disclose that (see WP:PAID for details). ~ Anachronist (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

• I agree with Anachronist. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

@RHaworth:, I undrestood what do you mean. How can I rewrite my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Дмитрий Бугаев (talk • contribs)

• Anachronist has already given you more help than I am prepared to give. Please wait: if your company / product ever becomes notable someone with no CoI will write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@RHaworth:, Do you mean that my article should be like similar-theme articles like Tripadvisor, Foursquare or Airbnb? And what are key indicators of "notable" service for Wikipedia - free encyclopedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Дмитрий Бугаев (talk • contribs)

• There is no need to use {{reply}} on this page! No - I mean that you should not be writing in Wikipedia. Go and talk to Anachronist who, I hope, will give you similar advice but more gently. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Дмитрий Бугаев (talk • contribs)

Hey, the page for Electromagnetic Radio Frequency Convergence was taken down due to copyright infringement. I've rewritten the article to remove the copyright infringement and want to upload the article again. This is my first time contributing to wikipedia so how do you suggest I proceed? — Achiriya (talk) 19:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

• Upload the article again. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Doing good?

I joined Wikipedia over ten years ago. Upon joining, I simply introduced myself on my user page. I'm a professional artist, this is what I do, so I'd explain that, and that's it! I may have included a few links to my portals, but I'd never actually visit nor update that user page. I had completely forgotten about it to be honest, so I hardly call anything I wrote "promotion"... I was just introducing myself to the community, that's all!

Now, would I relaunch that user page, would I be allowed to say anything about myself and what I do or would that be considered "self-promotion" and "using Wikipedia as a web host"? Also, I have been editing and contributing to Wikipedia for over 10 years—very occasionally, not so regularly, but I'm part of the community and not just some troll.

Yesterday, I visited the InfoWars Wikipedia article Talk Page and noticed a vote regarding the political position of InfoWars. I put in my vote and explained my reasoning. I was very polite, and I did not attack nor smear anybody. I was looking forward to polite, civilized responses, but I ended up getting a very rude, rude, rude response from a certain user, and for what? Their response was arrogant, impertinent and just insulting. You see!

Sure, they criticized me on my user page I actually never updated nor visited in years! I guess taking it down felt like a "victory" to them, and it's funny how nobody ever had an issue with it before. I don't actually care since I'd never use it anyway. Say they are right and my page did not focus on Wikipedia enough, the rest of their response was totally impertinent, inflammatory, and I am right!

I rarely ever get involved in political Wiki articles, and almost everytime I do, there must be a conflict. Once again, I was very polite, but obviously, I had the wrong political opinion! Is that what Wikipedia has become? Food for thought... Israell (talk) 00:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Okay... I've read the rules and republished my page—without any link to my portals—. For example: a five page résumé and advertising for your band will probably be too much, a brief three sentence summary that you work in field X and have a band named Y will be fine. Wikipedia:User pages#What may I have in my user pages? — Israell (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• Talk about the kettle calling the pan black! This edit is unquestionably very rude and you deserve to be blocked for it. I deleted the first version of your user page because it was an ugly mess of naked URLs and told us nothing about what you do here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. It seems Ahi (surname) which you just deleted and salted a couple of days back has found its way into main space again as Ahi surname. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• Fixed but keep watching. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Me again... I was wondering if you could help or share some thoughts. There appears a real mess about a movie called "Bhagshesh". First, there seems a back and forth about the spelling and if a sub-title is present or not. This led to multiple incarnations in draft and main space with all sort of redirects: Draft:Bhagshesh (film), Draft:Bhagshesh: The Remainder, Bhagshesh: The Reminder (my bad introducing the typo), Draft:Bhagshesh (a redirect in draft) and finally Bhagshesh another redirect, this time to the movie maker. The AfC drafts are all waiting for approval and have previously been rejected, so I think someone is trying to jump the gun as this is a recently released movie... _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh, and also Bhagshesh: The Remainder which redirects from main space to draft space. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• Fixed but keep watching. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello there, I did not ask for my talk page to be deleted, and as far as I know this isn't even possible, so could you please restore it. — Colonestarrice (talk) 13:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• Colonestarrice, "I did not ask for my talk page to be deleted". But you did! You applied a speedy tag to User:Colonestarrice/infobox and failed to bracket it with <noinclude></noinclude> . This meant that your user talk page also appeared in CAT:CSD and got deleted. Of course it is technically possible to delete user talk pages but the rule book is very firm that they should not be deleted. So I have restored yours. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, as you deleted that page because of circular link, can you also help me to delete other circular link that can be seen at What links here. Thank you. Hddty. (talk) 14:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• I am getting idle in my old age. I have access to a couple of bulk deletion tools but they don't seem to work in this particular case. The reason for deleting them is that they will create red links in the main article to highlight wanted articles. Another approach is to do edits such as these and turn them into non-links. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello sir recently i have submitted an article about dr Hemachandran best scientist of India award winner i have given adequate reference but why the page is been deleted. Please resolve this activity . I have worked hard to collect information about him and i have submitted the newsletter and magazine datas and award photo of him but why it is deleted .i kindly request you to undelete the article . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandrapandiyan (talk • contribs) 18:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• So which of your mass of external links pointed to an independent in-depth article about you? Please wait. I assure you that if you ever become notable, someone with no CoI will write about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

On 23:24, 5 December 2009 you protected Cameron Wilson so that ordinary users cannot create it. A user has now created Cameron Wilson (golfer) presumably because he couldn't create the other. Perhaps you could sort this out or at least move the article over. — Nigej (talk) 19:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Nigej:  Done by RHaworth at 21:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC). --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• The deleted edits are about a different and distinctly non-notable person. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Message moved to draft talk:The Redemption of Ham

Hello, you have recently deleted the page Codejig ERP under the A7 criterion. This is the first article I have created, so I might have breached certain Wikipedia's guidelines despite aiming to cover a notable topic and relying on secondary sources. Could you please explain why the page was tagged as lacking the credible claim of significance and how to avoid being flagged for the same reason in the future? I would really appreciate any feedback! -- Grosella74 (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your product is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please delete

1. User:Hhhhhkohhhhh/twinkleoptions.js
2. User:Hhhhhkohhhhh/common.js

Thanks Hhkohh (talk) 16:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Hhkohh: If you tag your pages with {{db-u1}} or use twinkle if you have it, the next patrolling admin will catch em. Which might be Mr RH, but then, he could be Partying It Up in Thornton Heath, and you wouldn't wanna have to wait for that  :) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 16:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129: Can not. This is my script in my old username. But I have tagged on talk page twice but RH only deleted talk page, so I have to post here Hhkohh (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• Applying speedy tags to .js , .css or redirect pages is a bit more difficult than to article pages but a user as experienced as Hhkohh ought to have been able to do it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Can you help me regarding the query of this wikipedia page. Dear RHaworth its great pleasure to talk with you, could you please tell the reason why this page was deleted and pleasure notify about how to make it eligible for the publishment criteria it would be your faithfulness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunraina121 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• It had an horrible shouted title, it was a blatant misuse of a template and its content was not even valid wiki markup. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Haworth, I decided to create a wiki page about Dr. Dhulipala Mahadeva Mani, an unofficial teacher of mine, so I created a couple of questions, and I conducted a personal interview with him. After a few days of hard work, I finally published my first Wikipedia article. A day later it was moved to a draft space because I did not put any sources on the page. After seeing this, I added the recording of the interview as a reference, and resubmitted the "Draft". A day after I added the reference, you deleted this page under G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Link that was valid before speedy deletion.

I have a few questions regarding the speedy deletion:

1. Could you please explain which part/parts of the article that deem it capable of speedy deletion?
2. Was G11 the only reason that this page was deleted?
3. while waiting for your response I will fix what I think is wrong with the article, and also fix what you think is wrong and after that could you please Review my article one last time before I resubmit it?

Thank you so much, Fhurfu21 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• You say that the interview is your work so the article is devoid of independent evidence of notability and as such, it stands no chance of being accepted. But I have restored it. Do not put back any of the honorifics. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Mr. Haworth, I appreciate the fact that even though you are an administrator on Wikipedia You still take the time, to look over my small project, I can't thank you enough. Thank you so much, I will try to fix everything that is wrong with the article ASAP, but as a small favor; could you tell me what exactly is wrong with the article? By the honorifics do you mean the Awards and Honors,? and if so they are common among Hindu discourse speakers, so I believe that They should stay there. Thank you so much --Fhurfu21 (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Hayworth, Just added some more acceptable/Viable references, can you please check the draft over to see if anything else is wrong? Also, can you please clarify what you mean by "Honorifics". Thank you, --Fhurfu21 (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

• For goodness sake! learn wikilinks and how to spell my name. Replied at draft talk:Dhulipala Mahadeva Mani. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Dear RHaworth, the page for Ahad Raza Mir has been repeatedly deleted for legitimate reasons, but I think that looking at draft:Ahad Raza Mir article a case could make to move it to the main-space, under his name, which is being blocked due to the lack of authorizations. Cheers, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arslan-San (talk • contribs)

• When you think your draft is ready, click on "submit your draft for review". If it gets accepted then unprotection of the mainspace title will be uncontroversial. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Why did you revert my CSD nomination? The category was created by a confirmed sockpuppet[1] of prolific sockpuppeter (Over 100 sockpuppets to date) Ryan kirkpatrick. WP:G5 aka WP:DENY clearly applies as no other edits were made to that category but by the sockpuppet....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

• I disagree with {{db-banned}}: if a page is valid, what does it matter who created it? In this case the page needs to exist: what is the point of deleting it so that someone else can re-create it? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed you deleted my article StreamingVideoProvider, just after less than 2 hours of publishing it and 1 hour of being tagged with "speedy deletion". And the editor who tagged it himself said (on my talk page) the article has more work to be done but not be deleted. I believe the article is notable for many reasons:

• The website had +1000 Organizations Worldwide to host over 120,000 corporate videos and stream over 30,000,000 Minutes of video a Year.
• Has important customers like Ericom Software.
• Launched in 2006. (which makes it one of the oldest of the nowadays living video networks).
• The founder of the company himself has a whole article in The Telegraph talking about his business in 2005 (before launching StreamingVideoProvider).
• The company has +50 employees.
• Headquartered in London and has locations in other 2 European countries and one location in the US.
• I think this reason is enough to consider the platform notable: Got permission to broadcast in China, which is a very important achievement, as most of the similar platforms are banned.
• Has certified cased studies and projects for church and TV-stations in different locations, also Universities like the University of Essex and Dulwich college.
• The article itself is informative and I believe there is no promotional tone at all, and I tried to be short. And there are links from Reuters and other reliable sources.

Thank you. عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) None of those things you listed defines notability in Wikipedia terms. See WP:Golden rule and WP:CORP to learn what is needed for a company to merit an article here. ~ Anachronist (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Anachronist, These are just some of the reasons. The article itself holds what is required. I read all related things to notability guidelines and I still believe the platform is notable as it is one of the biggest 10 companies in video hosting in the world, and as there are already Wikipedia articles for similar platforms (some are smaller!) like DaCast.

• Significant coverage: Reuters (A whole article talking about the latest edition of the website)
• Reliable sources: yahoo.new
• Independent sources: TechCrunch

عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Also, the user who tagged it did not say "has more work to be done but not be deleted", they said, "If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion". But this required you to make a sufficiently cogent case on the talk page to defer the deletion, which unfortunately did not happen. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 14:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

I read the message wrongly. But when he wrote that, I went to the link to "contest the deletion" but the article was removed, and this was only after minutes of the tag. So, there is no way but the talk page. And the deletion was surprising to me. "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases." Speedy Deletion. — عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

• Far too much waffle. Restored to draft:StreamingVideoProvider. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

I believe this waffle contains much reason. I edited the draft, do you still see advertising? or is the article itself is not notable (as you didn't say anything)? — عليّ سعيد (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

• The article is no more or less notable than any other page on Wikipedia. What you should be talking about is the notability of the subject of the article and in that case, I suspect it does not meet our requirements. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I checked the rules and guidelines again in Notability (organizations and companies). Where is the "notability of the subject of the article"? considering that we are talking about a live streaming software company. We can't expect the company to make incredible things to refer to the subject as notable. The thing is to have history and achievements. This works on similar software or apps articles, which get approved in the encyclopedia, and if you want quite close articles of live streaming platforms, check DaCast , Wistia. — عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Why are you continuing to talk to me? I have restored the article. What more do you want of me? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

No problem. Just restore my Sandbox.عليّ سعيد (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Apologies, I was trying to look at the contributions of a blocked user, FIFAmania, but accidentally opened the wrong link, could this be restored? Thanks, S.A. Julio (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

You deleted page User:AzureMo/sandbox/Integrated Research on Disaster Risk (IRDR) (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.irdrinternational.org/who-we-are/membership/ ). IRDR is a research programme co-sponsored by UNISDR and ISC. I am the communication officer of IRDR and edit the content of IRDR website and social media. Meanwhile, I have added IRDR's link in the Wikipedia:Free or semi-free non-Public-Domain information resources. Could you then un-delete my page? Thank you very much.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AzureMo (talk • contribs) Latest revision as of 10:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

• Please read this. The source has a straighforward © message at the bottom so we must assume "all rights reserved". In any case kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your organisation is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

I've been trying and failing to properly format my request for deletion for the past few hours now. Please just have mercy on me and nuke my usertalk page from orbit. I've asked you, the admins, the formatting (I don't know what I could be mistyping but I've been trying and failing to find the solution for hours now). Nuke it and this request, please. Rename me to a random string of characters for all it matters, I'd prefer you delete me but rename me if necessary. — Mattbash (talk) 10:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

• I do not have the necessary rights. Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I was about to move it to my userspace, but you beat me to it. Could you please move it my userspace with history? Thanks. —usernamekiran (talk) 13:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. It is very much appreciated. See you around :) —usernamekiran (talk) 03:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I apologise to keep on nagging you, and also apologise for not mentioning it in my orginal request: would you please request restore the talk page as well? Sorry again. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:25, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Do not be so mean with links: some people provide three links in their signatures and you definitely should have linked to the page about which you are talking. Talk page restored - it is one of my failings that I usually forget to check for a talk page when I restore. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I should have linked to the talkpage in my second comment. Sorry about that. Thanks again. See you around. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Doug, I tagged your email with {{db-context}} - I have no idea what it was talking about. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

You seem to have closed Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 30#Draft:Sugondese, which was open for less than 48 hours and in which no one other than the nominator had !voted, and deleted the redirect. You haven't, to my knowledge, identified any CSD or procedural close criterion justifying the deletion. What's going on here? Best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

• Redirects from draftspace do not need to be and indeed should not usually be deleted. However if I see one with a deletion proposal, I zap it as being the simplest thing to do. Please explain to me very carefully what purpose, in your opinion, draft:Sugondese served. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't believe it served any purpose and would have !voted to delete if given the chance. The policy that holds that decisions are made on the basis of consensus and not of administrators' whims, however, has a purpose that I'm sure I don't need to explain to you. I've begun a discussion at DRV (see below). Best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Draft:Sugondese. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth,

I would be enormously appreciative if you would share with me the markup for the user sandbox article you deleted today from the following page: User:Digimarketer4455/sandbox. I have no intentions of re-submitting this content, I would just like to have a record of it for my own reference. Please let me know if this is possible. My email is <redacted>. Thank you, Digimarketer4455 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digimarketer4455 (talk • contribs)

• Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

That was a pretty hasty decision to delete the article. If you'd taken a look at it, you'd see that the references and information are not copyrighted by Mobygames, they are magazine and newspaper articles from their respective sources. The only thing that was Mobygames' was the image. Please reconsider and return the article. — Deltasim (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit: I have checked out the mobygames article and I found out that user Kristie Ann Webb had apparently copied the summary straight from it. Can you restore the article so I change the text to something original but still accurate. Thank you. Deltasim (talk) 20:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• American Tail is a redirect and has never been deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm talking about the video game article An American Tail: The Computer Adventures of Fievel and His Friends. Please restore the article so I can changes that don't make it breach copyright. Deltasim (talk) 11:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Preferences have been changed to allow you to email me. Wikilink: An American Tail: The Computer Adventures of Fievel and His Friends Thank you. Deltasim (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

• Still cannot see an "email this user" link. Have you ticked "allow other users to email me"? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry my bad. Overlooked that one. It should be fixed now. Deltasim (talk) 17:17, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for leaving feedback on my user page!!! Sorry my page as full of nonsense, but I will try to recreate it based on Wikipedia's guidelines. Again, thank you! Charles Joseph Baybay (talk) 00:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Hey, I was wondering if we could discuss the state of the suicideboys article and why it's on three other non English Wikipedia's and not the English one. Let's get in touch. Cganuelas (talk) 11:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

• So what do you want to "discuss"? The title to which you failed to link it is just one of innumerable variants deleted under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$uicideboy$. However my crude but usually accurate test says that possibly you do not have a serious CoI so if you think they have become sufficiently notable within the last two years, feel free to create a new version, preferably in draft space. I am willing to email you a selection of deleted states - read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, you recently deleted my entry Domosaurus Rex. I am trying to add this to the data base, please tell me what was wrong with the format or why it was tagged hoax/fraudulent and taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph Gambino (talk • contribs)

• There has never been an article called Domosaurus Rex. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Texas Confederate Museum. Did you even notice that I had added additional sources this morning? And I wasn’t finished. — deisenbe (talk)

• Sources added but was the copyvio stuff removed? Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)