User talk:Saxum

Please don't delete tags for comment on articles. That is considered vandalism. — kwami (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Croatia! I hope you enjoy contributing to the project. Should you need any assistance or information, I'd be glad to lend a hand if at all possible. Cheers! Tomobe03 (talk) 23:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from your recent contributions in the area of navy and air force topics, I think you might be interested in joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history as well. It is one of the most active wiki projects around with more than 1,200 active participants who might offer assistance, peer reviews and more. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to let you know I appreciate your great contribution on Šibenik (RTOP-21) and Velebit (P-01) articles. I added article ratings, based on WP Military history criteria, but please do not be put off by the "Start" rating which is the product of B1 and B2 criteria not being met - both are relatively straightforward to achieve. The B1 pertains to referencing, and it requires that all claims in the article be referenced to reliable sources, while the B2 pertains to coverage of the article (also its accuracy, but that's not the issue here). What's missing in terms of the B2 criterion is a short section on vessel characteristics (basically covering whatever's presented in the infobox) and construction/launching. Once again, nice work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I have to disagree on one point though - both Šibenik and Velebit have potential to become Good Articles at least, if not better, regardless of the navy size or significance. If, say Šibenik article, contained all relevant information no matter how little is available, it would meet the B2 criterion. For further info on that see WP:CL-RULE which clearly says the topic need not be "grand" to have a good article. For an example of a recently promoted GA on a warship, see SMS Bussard. If you decide to take any of the HRM ship articles to GA nominations, I'd be glad to help. I have a bit of experience in the field, having successfully GA nominated HMS Aldenham (L22).--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...to say these navy-related articles were nice. GregorB (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I can't remember exactly why i did the moves / edits, but seem to remember that the designations were not consistent so I had to choose one or the other. J-21 is probably best, and the article seems better for it. Thanks --Petebutt (talk) 18:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Una, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Una (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! What makes the Operation Una a battle of the Croatian War of Independence? Ample sources indicate the Operation Storm was the final significant combat of the CWoI.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bok,

Poslao sam ti mail. Nije ništa hitno. --Argo Navis (talk) 10:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for the holidays and a very successful new year!--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I had another look at the Velebit submarine article and I think it's now missing just a couple of refs. There are two sources which seem to be subpar - paluba.info and paraćin site - which are quite fine for External Links but I'm not so sure about refs.

Furthermore, I stumbled on this source identifying the sub as ex-Soča P-914 rather than ex-Zeta as well as potentially offering info capable of replacing at least a some of the two (in my opinion at least) subpar sources as backing up refs. I also found this article from year 2000 musing on possible (now apparently abandoned) construction of additional sister ships. For what it's worth, the "Soča rather than Zeta" claim is supported by this and this. Since at least 2012 P-913 Zeta is in Pivka, Slovenia (photo included) as seen here.

I believe the two sources I pointed out (and missing refs) would prevent it from reaching GA class, but otherwise it's just great! Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 00:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If reliable sources identify the sub variously, the "controversy" should be noted in the article itself - that's no major problem at any rate. The problem, if any, with the two sources is that a GA reviewer is more than likely to see those as WP:SELFPUBLISH and dismiss them as unacceptable according to that policy. I don't think authors of the two sites had any reason to misrepresent technical data, but I'm quite sure all those technical data may be found elsewhere - and am willing to help locate such sources if needed. For instance the book identifying the Velebit as ex-Soča also provides some technical details on the vessel.--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is the 6-day endurance specific to Velebit or does it apply to Una-class in general?--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. I'd include the specs listed in the infobox (length, displacements, etc), armaments, crew size etc. in the Design and construction section as well and remove refs from the infobox then.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this source, p.145 indicates 7-day endurance, submerged range of 135 nautical miles (250 kilometres; 155 miles) at 3 knots (5.6 kilometres per hour; 3.5 miles per hour) and range while using a snorkel of 500 nmi at 8 kts. This info may be useful to include too.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same source also indicates that Velebit had STN-Atlas Elektronik PP-10 active and PSU-1-2 passive sonar.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...and a five-bladed propeller delivering 54 shaft horsepower (40 kilowatts) (I'm not sure what this specifically means though).--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One unrelated thing: the article currently employs a mix of DMY and MDY date formats (the former mostly in references). Select one and apply it consistently.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If there are conflicting information, obviously the manufacturer will likely have more accurate data. In case of the sonar, I don't see a problem here. It appears the vessel was completed without one, yet at some point it acquired it. Also bear in mind that the arms embargo was not really enforced since 1994. It would be quite unlikely to acquire a submarine then, but a sonar would be a different thing altogether. Since a reliable source reports it and no other reliable source contradicts existence of the sonar except at the time Velebit was completed (i.e. in 1996) it is not unreasonable to include it in the article. Four vs six mines issue is different though since a reliable source (BI) contradicts other info and I assume it is reasonable that the manufacturer has accurate information.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's forget about the above, and concentrate on the BI then: the HRBI source notes range, crew, maximum surface/submerged speed - so those should be added to the article (prose and infobox), and info already included in the infobox should be added to the prose - displacement(s), length, draft, beam etc. - and references moved from the infobox to the body prose (per MOS:INFOBOX).--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In order to address sonar/no sonar material, I'd add a sentence following the one already in the prose saying Velebit was completed without a sonar. I suggest it read "According to the 2007 edition of The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World, Velebit was fitted with STN-Atlas Elektronik PP-10 active and PSU-1-2 passive sonar, and a portable navigational radar may have been used on board along with the GPS.", referencing it to the guide itself. Then I'd add "The claim is contradicted by other sources.", referencing that to the 2007 Slobodna Dalmacija article. That would present info giving it due weight and leaving any conclusions to readers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was BSO a division (or something else) of Brodosplit in 1996?--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Another question: I'm looking at 9 December 2013 date in the Brodarski Institut ref and I'm wondering where did the date come from. I found no specific date attached. Where did you find it?--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, in such cases, one should omit the date from the sfn and refid templates altogether, the date (or year) should always refer to publication date if known, or be omitted if unknown per template documentation.--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does DPR OSRH 2006 - 2015 9 December 2013 also refers to access date rather than publication date?--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And Brodarski Institut - Reference ref does not work - or at least that's what it looks like to me--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe my browser is acting up. No worries then. The infobox should also include year when the sub was decommissioned or something, I suppose.--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a double box will be needed here. Let me try something and then revert if you prefer to handle it otherwise.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added an extra box similar to Ramb IV. Thoughts?--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One more nitpick: there's an image caption saying "Ship name" only. I only assume that's ship's name on the exterior of her hull - it would be good to revise that caption to say where the name appears or something along those lines.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Believe it or not, I have no further suggestions for the article, but one: nominate it as a good article! Instructions are found at WP:GAN/I. I may tweak a word or a link or two yet, but a review won't start immediately anyway.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can also apply at WP:GOCE/REQ for copyediting of this (and other) articles. The requests there take long time to process, but prose quality will improve for sure.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian submarine Velebit (P-01) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 04:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Croatian submarine Velebit (P-01) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatian submarine Velebit (P-01) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Congratulations on getting the Croatian submarine Velebit (P-01) to Good Article status. Keep up the good work - hope this is just the first GA of many more to come next year! Tomobe03 (talk) 12:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message - you're welcome. There are few more things you can do with this article - if you want to improve it further, there's MILHIST A-class review available at WP:MHR. Before going there I'd recommend requesting a copyedit at WP:GOCE/REQ first though. Recently promoted good articles are also eligible for a main page appearance if they contain an interesting fact and a nomination is created within five days of the GA review at WP:DYK. Finally, there's a Military History Project contest at WP:MHCON where this and other (not necessarily GAs) articles may be entered. Once more congrats! Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian missile boat Kralj Petar Krešimir IV (RTOP-11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You're quite correct, the website changed - maybe the article is deleted or the url changed somehow. Try googling a passage, say the last sentence up in a week or so to see if google found it again. In the meantime, there's an archive of the page here. I don't know if that's permanent or not though. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian patrol boat Šolta (OB-02) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 23:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Croatian patrol boat Šolta (OB-02) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatian patrol boat Šolta (OB-02) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Una-class submarine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Una-class submarine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Una-class submarine for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats on the two additional GAs. Keep up the good work! and Cheers Tomobe03 (talk) 13:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see there's more where those came from! I like the template idea, that would be nice to have.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saxum, congratulations on the GA, I have nominated Una-class submarine for Did you know here, which will hopefully result in the article appearing on the main page. Thanks, Matty.007 19:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Una-class submarine, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Una-class submarines were midgets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Una-class submarine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Another good hook. Cheers. Victuallers (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silba-class landing ship-minelayer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silba-class landing ship-minelayer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silba-class landing ship-minelayer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Končar-class missile boat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Una-class submarine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Una (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silba-class landing ship-minelayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Končar-class missile boat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Končar-class missile boat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saxum, congratulations on the GA. I have nominated it for Did you know, which will hopefully result in the article appearing on the main page; the link is at Template:Did you know nominations/Končar-class missile boat. Please feel free to comment or suggest an alternate hook(s). Thanks again, Matty.007 11:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Končar-class missile boat, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Končar-class missile boat has two chaff launchers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Končar-class missile boat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1st Split Partisan Detachment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Remo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1st Split Partisan Detachment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1st Split Partisan Detachment for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1st Split Partisan Detachment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1st Split Partisan Detachment for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:02, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats on achieving GA status of the 1st Split Partisan Detachment article - and contributing to the WP:Croatia its 150th good article. Keep up the good work! Tomobe03 (talk) 11:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My congratulations too, a fine work! GregorB (talk) 21:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, both! :-) --Saxum (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1st Split Partisan Detachment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saxum, I just wanted to let you know that I've finished copyediting Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik, an article you listed on the GOCE requests page. Comments are appreciated. --Biblioworm 16:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, as evidenced by your nomination in the 2014 "Military History Newcomer of the Year" awards, I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saxum, I'm one of the editors of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter The Bugle, and I'd like to invite you to participate in a group interview with all the nominees for the 2014 Military History Newcomer Award which we're hoping to run in the January edition. If you're interested in participating, I'd appreciate it if you could post responses to some or all of the questions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/January 2015/Interview by 11 January. Thank you, Nick-D (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian missile boat Kralj Petar Krešimir IV (RTOP-11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yugoslav submarine Mališan (P-901), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compressor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yugoslav submarine Mališan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Četnik-class torpedo boat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Displacement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malinska-class mining tender, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mine warfare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yugoslav submarine Mališan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yugoslav submarine Mališan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 12:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soko G-2 Galeb, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Soko and Warbirds. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Orjen-class torpedo boat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Orjen-class torpedo boat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Orjen-class torpedo boat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian training ship Andrija Mohorovičić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just prepping this article for Milhist ACR, and wondered if you could confirm exactly what Fraccaroli says about the original and Italian armament? Some sources (like Brescia) seem to indicate that the original armament was two TT plus a 40 mm Bofors plus a 15 mm MG, possibly the Czech ZB vz.60 given the close relationship between Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia in the interwar period. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ljubo Karaman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saxum, pls provide more than one independent reliable sources (at least 3) and resubmit for review. thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I would like you to join the discussion on the talk page. Thank you.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please close this RfC? [2] The thing is starting to become tiresome. --3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

During inspectin of old mates I encountered you here. It looks to me that you did not published an article for a long time and that you are still interested in the navy as you were when you went in the military port as wiki representative. If you are still living at the same place (near that port) we might go for a cup of coffe after the situation gets better. Please note that my only contact is my mail here!!! All the best--Yutmak (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Judging from your recent articles, you might also be interested in WP:BORA. Cheers. -- Tomobe03 (talk) 15:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]