Dan Rinehart (He, His, Him)’s Post

View profile for Dan Rinehart (He, His, Him), graphic

Business solutions by day, entrepreneur by evening, Mr. Gay Missouri America between all else, and dog dad to Koro (no, his name is not a password). Have fun, laugh in the moment, and make every impression memorable.

By golly this makes sense. As a business t-Mobile strives to offer the best experience on our network. To do that, consumers, users, partners need technology and at affordable costs. By driving a forced unlock policy sooner than a payoff there would be an adjustment to compensate financially the decision. That’s just business I believe but weigh in please after reading the details. What are your thoughts?

AT&T makes the same demand as T-Mobile to restrict customer freedom

AT&T makes the same demand as T-Mobile to restrict customer freedom

phonearena.com

Jacob I.

Equipment Sales Specialist - Ag, Turf, Construction

1mo

I'll start by saying I think making this policy is an overreach by the FCC. I don't think this is the right approach. However to say this is anti consumer is a bit of a reach on carriers to claim, they already went back to inflated plan pricing for device deals just like contract days. Phone manufacturers should subsidize devices if they want to earn market share. Carriers should focus on services and plans to earn market share.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics