1

Is there a position where w.l.o.g. white is to move, it has a mate in three, and no matter what black does, white's two first moves must be quiet (i.e., without check or capture) in order not to delay the checkmate?

Improve this question
1

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
1

Three? I'm just too lazy to send you half of the SCHWALBE #3 originals! I bet the score can be pushed far higher.

Romeo Bedoni, Andre Cheron, Journal de Geneve 28/06/1975, #57

[Title "White to move"]
[FEN "7n/ppp2p2/2N2Pp1/6B1/8/8/p1p2PKp/rbNk1rbR w - - 0 1"]

Note that the first capturing move pair Kxf1 bxc6 was added only later to increase the move numbers. Simply drop it again to have a #56 fulfilling your needs. Also note a big defect: it doesn't matter in which order you play the tempo-losing K-f3-g3-g2.

Solution

A "cleaner" example: Mate in 18.

Pierre-Antoine Cathignol, diagrammes 1987-1988, 2. Preis

[Title "White to move"]
[FEN "8/8/8/2b3p1/5pPk/4pPp1/2N1PpP1/5K2 w - - 0 1"]

Solution

A study by Shinkman 1905, 97 moves until mate, unfortunately the pawn structure is illegal:

[Title "White to move"]
[FEN "bn2B3/rn2Bp1p/p6p/k2N1p2/7p/2bp1p2/5P2/3K3N w - - 0 1"]

A study by F. Lindgren 1917, 24 moves:

[Title "White to move"]
[FEN "8/8/5N2/8/3p1K1k/3N4/8/8 w - - 0 1"]

Solution to the studies and THX to all contributors from MatPlus (same thread).

Improve this answer
4
  • Oh, it is not as complicated as I thought it would be! Do you think it would be tricky if we only allowed mate-in-three positions where all non-"quiet" non-checkmate white moves make white lose the win? Anyway, great answer! Thank you!
    – FxMySz
    Commented Oct 13 at 17:25
  • 1
    This then would be an unexpected-mate-study. I know tons of them too (and just would have to check that they don't check - sorry :-) - or capture.).
    – Hauke Reddmann
    Commented Oct 13 at 17:34
  • Without the pawn White has a checkless mate in 7. Is there a mate in 7 or less that incudes a check?
    – bof
    Commented Oct 13 at 19:33
  • at everyone: since there is considerable interest, I take it to the experts at MatPlus. I'll edit my answer accordingly.
    – Hauke Reddmann
    Commented Oct 14 at 7:46
1

Hauke has already shown the longest mates, let me try those with the least pieces.

This is the longest mate (all single and silent moves, except the mating move) which I have found for KQ vs K:

[Title ""]
[Fen "8/1K6/8/4k3/8/5Q2/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
[StartFlipped "0"]

1.Kc6 Kd4 2.Qe2 Kc3 3.Kc5 Kb3 4.Qd2 Ka3 5.Kc4 Ka4 6.Qa2# ( 6.Qb4# )

(Update: This is also a mate in 6.)

And this is the longest for KR vs K:

[Title ""]
[Fen "8/8/8/8/8/7k/R7/6K1 w - - 0 1"]

1.Rg2 Kh4 2.Kh2 Kh5 3.Kh3 Kh6 4.Kh4 Kh7 5.Kh5 Kh8 6.Kg6 Kg8
7.Rf2 Kh8 Rf8#
Improve this answer
4
  • Thanks for this research. Are they unique (except for symmetry)? Or are other different KQvK or KRvK positions with the same sequence lengths?
    – FxMySz
    Commented Oct 17 at 23:04
  • @FxMySz I did not do it using a script, but manually, so it is possible that there are other possibilities with same or greater length.
    – Nils Lindemann
    Commented Oct 18 at 9:13
  • Oh, I see. Nice.
    – FxMySz
    Commented Oct 18 at 9:18
  • @FxMySz Found another mate in 6 in KQ vs K. But that one is just bringing the king closer.
    – Nils Lindemann
    Commented Oct 18 at 14:17

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.