2154

When copying an array in JavaScript to another array:

var arr1 = ['a','b','c'];
var arr2 = arr1;
arr2.push('d');  // Now, arr1 = ['a','b','c','d']

I realized that arr2 refers to the same array as arr1, rather than a new, independent array. How can I copy the array to get two independent arrays?

8
  • 4
    It looks like currently in Chrome 53 and Firefox 48 we have cool performance for slice and splice operations and new spread operator and Array.from have much slower implementation. Look at perfjs.fnfo
    – Pencroff
    Commented Sep 16, 2016 at 13:32
  • jsben.ch/#/wQ9RU <= this benchmark gives an overview over the different ways to copy an array Commented Oct 24, 2016 at 18:47
  • jsperf.com/flat-array-copy Commented May 25, 2017 at 17:08
  • 42
    It's 2017, so you might consider using ES6 features: let arr2 = [...arr1]; developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…
    – Hinrich
    Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 8:30
  • 2
    Well when you state a = b; you actually tell the program to point in both cases to a same symbolic link in random access memory. And when a value at this symbolic link is changed it affects a and b... So if you use a spread operator a= [...b]; program will create an additional symbolic link to a different location in random access memory and you can then manipulate a and b independently.
    – 71GA
    Commented Dec 15, 2019 at 20:49

40 Answers 40

3144

Use this:

let oldArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];

let newArray = oldArray.slice();

console.log({newArray});

Basically, the slice() operation clones the array and returns a reference to a new array.

Also note that:

For references, strings and numbers (and not the actual object), slice() copies object references into the new array. Both the original and new array refer to the same object. If a referenced object changes, the changes are visible to both the new and original arrays.

Primitives such as strings and numbers are immutable, so changes to the string or number are impossible.

15
  • 9
    Regarding performance the following jsPerf tests actually show that var arr2 = arr1.slice() is just as fast as var arr2 = arr1.concat(); JSPerf: jsperf.com/copy-array-slice-vs-concat/5 and jsperf.com/copy-simple-array . The result of jsperf.com/array-copy/5 kind of surprised me to the point I am wondering if the test code is valid.
    – Cohen
    Commented Dec 19, 2012 at 18:46
  • 117
    Even though this has already received a ton of upvotes, it deserves another because it properly describes references in JS, which is sort of rare, unfortunately.
    – Wayne
    Commented Jan 20, 2014 at 16:29
  • 38
    @GáborImre you'd add an entire library simply for readability? Really? I'd just add a comment if I were that concerned for readability. See: var newArray = oldArray.slice(); //Clone oldArray to newArray
    – dudewad
    Commented Feb 8, 2016 at 19:47
  • 13
    @GáborImre I get that, sure. But answering a specific engineering problem by including an entire library in my opinion is not helpful, it's design bloat. I see developers do that a lot, and then you end up with a project that included an entire framework to replace having to write a single function. Just my M.O., though.
    – dudewad
    Commented Feb 9, 2016 at 19:48
  • 15
    Lesson learned: Don't confuse .slice() with .splice(), which gives you an empty array. Big difference.
    – crazypeter
    Commented Feb 28, 2018 at 6:20
689

In Javascript, deep-copy techniques depend on the elements in an array. Let's start there.

Three types of elements

Elements can be: literal values, literal structures, or prototypes.

// Literal values (type1)
const booleanLiteral = true;
const numberLiteral = 1;
const stringLiteral = 'true';

// Literal structures (type2)
const arrayLiteral = [];
const objectLiteral = {};

// Prototypes (type3)
const booleanPrototype = new Bool(true);
const numberPrototype = new Number(1);
const stringPrototype = new String('true');
const arrayPrototype = new Array();
const objectPrototype = new Object(); // or `new function () {}

From these elements we can create three types of arrays.

// 1) Array of literal-values (boolean, number, string) 
const type1 = [ true, 1, "true" ];

// 2) Array of literal-structures (array, object)
const type2 = [ [], {} ];

// 3) Array of prototype-objects (function)
const type3 = [ function () {}, function () {} ];

Deep copy techniques depend on the three array types

Based on the types of elements in the array, we can use various techniques to deep copy.

Deep copy techniques

Javascript deep copy techniques by element types

Benchmarks

https://www.measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/17502/0/deep-copy-comparison

  • Array of literal-values (type1)
    The [ ...myArray ], myArray.splice(0), myArray.slice(), and myArray.concat() techniques can be used to deep copy arrays with literal values (boolean, number, and string) only; where slice() has the highest performance in Chrome, and spread ... has the highest performance in Firefox.

  • Array of literal-values (type1) and literal-structures (type2)
    The JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(myArray)) technique can be used to deep copy literal values (boolean, number, string) and literal structures (array, object), but not prototype objects.

  • All arrays (type1, type2, type3)

    • structuredClone();
    • The Lo-dash cloneDeep(myArray) or jQuery extend(true, [], myArray) techniques can be used to deep-copy all array-types. Where the Lodash cloneDeep() technique has the highest performance.
    • And for those who avoid third-party libraries, the custom function below will deep-copy all array-types, with lower performance than cloneDeep() and higher performance than extend(true).
function copy(aObject) {
  // Prevent undefined objects
  // if (!aObject) return aObject;

  let bObject = Array.isArray(aObject) ? [] : {};

  let value;
  for (const key in aObject) {

    // Prevent self-references to parent object
    // if (Object.is(aObject[key], aObject)) continue;
    
    value = aObject[key];

    bObject[key] = (typeof value === "object") ? copy(value) : value;
  }

  return bObject;
}

So to answer the question...

Question

var arr1 = ['a','b','c'];
var arr2 = arr1;

I realized that arr2 refers to the same array as arr1, rather than a new, independent array. How can I copy the array to get two independent arrays?

Answer

Because arr1 is an array of literal values (boolean, number, or string), you can use any deep copy technique discussed above, where slice() and spread ... have the highest performance.

arr2 = arr1.slice();
arr2 = [...arr1];
arr2 = arr1.splice(0);
arr2 = arr1.concat();
arr2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr1));
arr2 = structuredClone(arr1);
arr2 = copy(arr1); // Custom function needed, and provided above
arr2 = _.cloneDeep(arr1); // Lo-dash.js needed
arr2 = jQuery.extend(true, [], arr1); // jQuery.js needed
13
  • 3
    Many of these approaches do not work well. Using the assignment operator means that you have to reassign the original literal value of arr1. It's very rare that that's going to be the case. Using splice obliterates arr1, so that's not a copy at all. Using JSON will fail if any of the values in the array are Functions or have prototypes (such as a Date).
    – Dancrumb
    Commented Sep 18, 2014 at 19:53
  • 1
    Why splice(0)? Shouldn't it be slice() ? I think it's supposed not to modify original array, which splice does. @JamesMontagne
    – helpse
    Commented May 14, 2015 at 15:29
  • 2
    splice will create pointers to the elements in the original array (shallow copy). splice(0) will allocate new memory (deep copy) for elements in the array which are numbers or strings, and create pointers for all other element types (shallow copy). By passing a start value of zero to the splice function-method, it won't splice any elements from the original array, and therefore it doesn't modify it. Commented May 21, 2015 at 9:35
  • 2
    Actually, there is only one type of array: an array of "somethings". There is no difference between [0,"1",{2:3},function random() {return 4;}, [[5,6,7],[8,9,10],[11,12,13]]] and any other array.
    – wizzwizz4
    Commented Apr 7, 2016 at 9:12
  • 1
    IMO these all have bad legibility. The fact that someone is meaning to clone an array is not apparent to me. What is wrong with calling it x.clone()?
    – Jonny
    Commented May 16, 2022 at 6:25
219

You can use array spreads ... to copy arrays.

const itemsCopy = [...items];

Also if want to create a new array with the existing one being part of it:

var parts = ['shoulders', 'knees'];
var lyrics = ['head', ...parts, 'and', 'toes'];

Array spreads are now supported in all major browsers but if you need older support use typescript or babel and compile to ES5.

More info on spreads

2
  • 8
    This won't work for deep copy. Deep Clone an Array in JavaScript.
    – SNag
    Commented Dec 28, 2019 at 18:47
  • 1
    Beware that this will also create new entries for "undefined" in the original array. Which might brake your code. Commented Apr 19, 2022 at 13:15
166

No jQuery needed... Working Example

var arr2 = arr1.slice()

This copys the array from the starting position 0 through the end of the array.

It is important to note that it will work as expected for primitive types (string, number, etc.), and to also explain the expected behavior for reference types...

If you have an array of Reference types, say of type Object. The array will be copied, but both of the arrays will contain references to the same Object's. So in this case it would seem like the array is copied by reference even though the array is actually copied.

6
  • 18
    No this would not be a deep copy. Commented Oct 14, 2014 at 22:16
  • 1
    Try this; var arr2 = JSON.stringify(arr1); arr2 = JSON.parse(arr2); Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 7:11
  • 4
    What's the difference between this answer and the accepted answer?
    – Isaac Pak
    Commented Apr 13, 2019 at 14:04
  • getting error in console for your given example "TypeError: window.addEvent is not a function" Commented Dec 31, 2019 at 5:42
  • @IsaacPak This was answered 2 mins before that.
    – brc-dd
    Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 16:40
88

This is how I've done it after trying many approaches:

var newArray = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(orgArray));

This will create a new deep copy not related to the first one (not a shallow copy).

Also this obviously will not clone events and functions, but the good thing you can do it in one line, and it can be used for any kind of object (arrays, strings, numbers, objects ...)

7
  • 7
    This is the best one. I use the same method a long time ago and think that there is no more sense in old school recursive loops Commented May 5, 2014 at 20:28
  • 2
    Be aware that this option doesn't handle well graph-like structures: crashes in presence of cycles, and doesn't preserve shared references.
    – Ruben
    Commented Jun 28, 2014 at 23:12
  • 3
    This also fails for things like Date, or indeed, anything that has a prototype. In addition, undefineds get converted to nulls.
    – Dancrumb
    Commented Sep 18, 2014 at 19:57
  • 10
    Is no one brave enough to comment on the gross inefficiency in both CPU and memory of serializing to text and then parsing back to an object? Commented Dec 9, 2014 at 23:58
  • 1
    This does a deep copy. The question didn't ask for that. Although it is useful, it does something different than the other answers.
    – wizzwizz4
    Commented Apr 7, 2016 at 9:15
77

An alternative to slice is concat, which can be used in 2 ways. The first of these is perhaps more readable as the intended behaviour is very clear:

var array2 = [].concat(array1);

The second method is:

var array2 = array1.concat();

Cohen (in the comments) pointed out that this latter method has better performance.

The way this works is that the concat method creates a new array consisting of the elements in the object on which it is called followed by the elements of any arrays passed to it as arguments. So when no arguments are passed, it simply copies the array.

Lee Penkman, also in the comments, points out that if there's a chance array1 is undefined, you can return an empty array as follows:

var array2 = [].concat(array1 || []);

Or, for the second method:

var array2 = (array1 || []).concat();

Note that you can also do this with slice: var array2 = (array1 || []).slice();.

2
  • 31
    Actually you can also do: var array2 = array1.concat(); It's a lot faster regarding performance. (JSPerf: jsperf.com/copy-simple-array and jsperf.com/copy-array-slice-vs-concat/5
    – Cohen
    Commented Dec 19, 2012 at 18:50
  • 5
    Its worth noting that if array1 isn't an array then [].concat(array1) returns [array1] e.g. if its undefined you'll get [undefined]. I sometimes do var array2 = [].concat(array1 || []); Commented Aug 1, 2014 at 8:27
30

Important!

Most of answers here works for particular cases.

If you don't care about deep/nested objects and props use (ES6):

let clonedArray = [...array]

but if you want to do deep clone use this instead:

let cloneArray = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(array))*

*functions won't be preserved (serialized) while using stringify, you will get result without them.


For lodash users:

let clonedArray = _.clone(array) documentation

and

let clonedArray = _.cloneDeep(array) documentation

25

I personally think Array.from is a more readable solution. By the way, just beware of its browser support.

// clone
let x = [1, 2, 3];
let y = Array.from(x);
console.log({y});

// deep clone
let clone = arr => Array.from(arr, item => Array.isArray(item) ? clone(item) : item);
x = [1, [], [[]]];
y = clone(x);
console.log({y});

1
  • 2
    Yes, this is very readable. The .slice() solution is completely unintuitive. Thanks for this.
    – Banago
    Commented Jul 27, 2016 at 14:46
22

Some of mentioned methods work well when working with simple data types like number or string, but when the array contains other objects these methods fail. When we try to pass any object from one array to another it is passed as a reference, not the object.

Add the following code in your JavaScript file:

Object.prototype.clone = function() {
    var newObj = (this instanceof Array) ? [] : {};
    for (i in this) {
        if (i == 'clone') 
            continue;
        if (this[i] && typeof this[i] == "object") {
            newObj[i] = this[i].clone();
        } 
        else 
            newObj[i] = this[i]
    } return newObj;
};

And simply use

var arr1 = ['val_1','val_2','val_3'];
var arr2 = arr1.clone()

It will work.

7
  • 2
    i get this error when i add this code to my page 'Uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded'
    – sawe
    Commented Jan 21, 2013 at 17:56
  • 1
    My apologies, this error occurs in chrome if arr1 is not declared. so i copy-pasted the above code, and i get the error, however, if i declare the array arr1, then i do not get the error. You could improve the answer by declaring arr1 just above arr2, i see there are quite a few of 'us' out there who did not recognise that we had to declare arr1 (partly because when i was evaluating your answer, i was in a rush and needed something that 'just works')
    – sawe
    Commented Apr 11, 2013 at 5:01
  • .slice() still works fine even if you have objects in your array: jsfiddle.net/edelman/k525g
    – Jason
    Commented May 30, 2013 at 19:49
  • 7
    @Jason but the objects are still pointing to the same object so changing one will change the other. jsfiddle.net/k525g/1
    – Samuel
    Commented Jul 8, 2013 at 14:39
  • Excellent code. One question I have, I actually tried to copy one array into another like this var arr1 = new Array() and then var arr2 = arr1; If I change something in arr2 the change happens also to arr1. However, if I use the clone prototype you made, It actually creates a complete new instance of that array or in other words it copies it. So is this a browser problem? or javascript by default sets the two variables by one pointing to an other with the use of pointers when someone does var arr2=arr1 and why does not happen with integer variables? see jsfiddle.net/themhz/HbhtA
    – themhz
    Commented Aug 11, 2013 at 18:13
22

From ES2015,

var arr2 = [...arr1];
0
12

If you are in an environment of ECMAScript 6, using the Spread Operator you could do it this way:

var arr1 = ['a','b','c'];
var arr2 = [...arr1]; //copy arr1
arr2.push('d');

console.log(arr1)
console.log(arr2)
<script src="http://www.wzvang.com/snippet/ignore_this_file.js"></script>

12

Primitive values are always pass by its value (copied). Compound values however are passed by reference.

So how do we copy this arr?

let arr = [1,2,3,4,5];

Copy an Array in ES6

let arrCopy = [...arr]; 

Copy n Array in ES5

let arrCopy = arr.slice(); 
let arrCopy = [].concat(arr);

Why `let arrCopy = arr` is not passing by value?

Passing one varible to another on Compound values such as Object/Array behave difrently. Using asign operator on copand values we pass reference to an object. This is why the value of both arrays are changing when removing/adding arr elements.

Exceptions:

arrCopy[1] = 'adding new value this way will unreference';

When you assign a new value to the variable, you are changing the reference itself and it doesn’t affect the original Object/Array.

read more

9

Adding to the solution of array.slice(); be aware that if you have multidimensional array sub-arrays will be copied by references. What you can do is to loop and slice() each sub-array individually

var arr = [[1,1,1],[2,2,2],[3,3,3]];
var arr2 = arr.slice();

arr2[0][1] = 55;
console.log(arr2[0][1]);
console.log(arr[0][1]);

function arrCpy(arrSrc, arrDis){
 for(elm in arrSrc){
  arrDis.push(arrSrc[elm].slice());
}
}

var arr3=[];
arrCpy(arr,arr3);

arr3[1][1] = 77;

console.log(arr3[1][1]);
console.log(arr[1][1]);

same things goes to array of objects, they will be copied by reference, you have to copy them manually

1
  • This answer deserves a spot near the top of the page! I was working with multidimensional sub arrays and could not follow why the inner arrays were always being copied by ref and not by val. This simple logic solved my problem. I would give you +100 if possible!
    – Mac
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 1:33
9
let a = [1,2,3];

Now you can do any one of the following to make a copy of an array.

let b = Array.from(a); 

OR

let b = [...a];

OR

let b = new Array(...a); 

OR

let b = a.slice(); 

OR

let b = a.map(e => e);

Now, if i change a,

a.push(5); 

Then, a is [1,2,3,5] but b is still [1,2,3] as it has different reference.

But i think, in all the methods above Array.from is better and made mainly to copy an array.

1
  • 1
    which one is the fastest?
    – Marc Frame
    Commented Jun 7, 2019 at 2:11
8

I would personally prefer this way:

JSON.parse(JSON.stringify( originalObject ));
1
  • So the way suggested here?
    – Script47
    Commented Mar 25, 2019 at 11:55
8

I found this method comparatively easier:

let arr = [1,2,3,4,5];
let newArr = [...arr];
console.log(newArr);

1
  • Has already been answered here (and a bunch of other answers).
    – Ivar
    Commented Sep 6, 2022 at 12:41
7

You must use best practice for this question when there are a lot of answers.

I recommend to you use array spreads … to copy arrays.

var arr1 = ['a','b','c'];

var arr2 = […arr1];

6

As we know in Javascript arrays and objects are by reference, but what ways we can do copy the array without changing the original array later one?

Here are few ways to do it:

Imagine we have this array in your code:

var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];

1) Looping through the array in a function and return a new array, like this:

 function newArr(arr) {
      var i=0, res = [];
      while(i<arr.length){
       res.push(arr[i]);
        i++;
       }
   return res;
 }

2) Using slice method, slice is for slicing part of the array, it will slice some part of your array without touching the original, in the slice, if don't specify the start and end of the array, it will slice the whole array and basically make a full copy of the array, so we can easily say:

var arr2 = arr.slice(); // make a copy of the original array

3) Also contact method, this is for merging two array, but we can just specify one of arrays and then this basically make a copy of the values in the new contacted array:

var arr2 = arr.concat();

4) Also stringify and parse method, it's not recommended, but can be an easy way to copy Array and Objects:

var arr2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr));

5) Array.from method, this is not widely supported, before use check the support in different browsers:

const arr2 = Array.from(arr);

6) ECMA6 way, also not fully supported, but babelJs can help you if you want to transpile:

const arr2 = [...arr];
5

You could use ES6 with spread Opeartor, its simpler.

arr2 = [...arr1];

There are limitations..check docs Spread syntax @ mozilla

5

Dan, no need to use fancy tricks. All you need to do is make copy of arr1 by doing this.

var arr1 = ['a','b','c'];
var arr2 = [];

var arr2 = new Array(arr1);

arr2.push('d');  // Now, arr2 = [['a','b','c'],'d']

console.log('arr1:');
console.log(arr1);

console.log('arr2:');
console.log(arr2);

// Following did the trick:
var arr3 = [...arr1];
arr3.push('d');  // Now, arr3 = ['a','b','c','d'];

console.log('arr3:');
console.log(arr3);

Now arr1 and arr2 are two different array variables stored in separate stacks. Check this out on jsfiddle.

2
  • 3
    This doesn't copy the array. It creates an array with one element that references the original (i.e. var arr2 = [arr1];).
    – Timothy003
    Commented Nov 21, 2018 at 23:25
  • @DragoRaptor I hope you don't mind that I edited your answer, completing your snippet code here with your code from jsfiddle, changing document.write(arr2) to console.log(arr2) so that nested array structure would show and better illustrate correct comment from @Timothy003. var arr3 = [...arr1] did the trick, though. Run code snippet to see results. (Output from document.write(arr2) was a bit misleading, hence I don't blame you). Commented Jul 14, 2021 at 17:35
5

var arr2 = arr1.slice(0);

This way just work for simple Arrays.

If you have Complex Array like array of Objects then you must use another solutions like:

const arr2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr1)); 

For example, we have an array of objects that each cell have another array field in its object ... in this situation if we use slice method then the array fields will copy by Ref and that's mean these fields updates will affect on orginal array same element and fields.

5

structuredClone

The modern way to copy array by value in JavaScript is to use structuredClone:

var arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
var arr2 = structuredClone(arr1); //copy arr1
arr2.push('d');

console.log(arr1); //a,b,c
console.log(arr2); //a,b,c,d

4

In my particular case I needed to ensure the array remained intact so this worked for me:

// Empty array
arr1.length = 0;
// Add items from source array to target array
for (var i = 0; i < arr2.length; i++) {
    arr1.push(arr2[i]);
}
1
  • 2
    +1 for not adding obscuity to your code by calling a function that does exactly the same thing, but in a less obvious way. slice may be more efficient under the hood, but to anyone working on the code, this shows your intent. plus it makes it easier to optimise later, if you want to (for example) filter what you are copying. note however this does not handle deep copying, and the same internal objects are passed to the new array, by reference. This might be what you want to do, it might not. Commented Jun 30, 2014 at 22:45
4

Make copy of multidimensional array/object:

function deepCopy(obj) {
   if (Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === '[object Array]') {
      var out = [], i = 0, len = obj.length;
      for ( ; i < len; i++ ) {
         out[i] = arguments.callee(obj[i]);
      }
      return out;
   }
   if (typeof obj === 'object') {
      var out = {}, i;
      for ( i in obj ) {
         out[i] = arguments.callee(obj[i]);
      }
      return out;
   }
   return obj;
}

Thanks to James Padolsey for this function.

Source: Here

0
4

If your array contains elements of the primitive data type such as int, char, or string etc then you can user one of those methods which returns a copy of the original array such as .slice() or .map() or spread operator(thanks to ES6).

new_array = old_array.slice()

or

new_array = old_array.map((elem) => elem)

or

const new_array = new Array(...old_array);

BUT if your array contains complex elements such as objects(or arrays) or more nested objects, then, you will have to make sure that you are making a copy of all the elements from the top level to the last level else reference of the inner objects will be used and that means changing values in object_elements in new_array will still affect the old_array. You can call this method of copying at each level as making a DEEP COPY of the old_array.

For deep copying, you can use the above-mentioned methods for primitive data types at each level depending upon the type of data or you can use this costly method(mentioned below) for making a deep copy without doing much work.

var new_array = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(old_array));

There are a lot of other methods out there which you can use depending on your requirements. I have mentioned only some of those for giving a general idea of what happens when we try to copy an array into the other by value.

1
  • Thanks a lot, your answer was the only one who worked for my scenario,
    – albert sh
    Commented Jun 19, 2019 at 3:07
3

If you want to make a new copy of an object or array, you must explicitly copy the properties of the object or the elements of the array, for example:

var arr1 = ['a','b','c'];
var arr2 = [];

for (var i=0; i < arr1.length; i++) {
   arr2[i] = arr1[i];
}

You can search for more information on Google about immutable primitive values and mutable object references.

1
  • 1
    You don't have to explicitly copy the properties of the objects of the array. See Chtiwi Malek's answer.
    – Magne
    Commented Jun 4, 2014 at 14:30
3

When we want to copy an array using the assignment operator ( = ) it doesn't create a copy it merely copies the pointer/reference to the array. For example:

const oldArr = [1,2,3];

const newArr = oldArr;  // now oldArr points to the same place in memory 

console.log(oldArr === newArr);  // Points to the same place in memory thus is true

const copy = [1,2,3];

console.log(copy === newArr);  // Doesn't point to the same place in memory and thus is false

Often when we transform data we want to keep our initial datastructure (e.g. Array) intact. We do this by making a exact copy of our array so this one can be transformed while the initial one stays intact.

Ways of copying an array:

const oldArr = [1,2,3];

// Uses the spread operator to spread out old values into the new array literal
const newArr1 = [...oldArr];

// Slice with no arguments returns the newly copied Array
const newArr2 = oldArr.slice();

// Map applies the callback to every element in the array and returns a new array
const newArr3 = oldArr.map((el) => el);

// Concat is used to merge arrays and returns a new array. Concat with no args copies an array
const newArr4 = oldArr.concat();

// Object.assign can be used to transfer all the properties into a new array literal
const newArr5 = Object.assign([], oldArr);

// Creating via the Array constructor using the new keyword
const newArr6 = new Array(...oldArr);

// For loop
function clone(base) {
	const newArray = [];
    for(let i= 0; i < base.length; i++) {
	    newArray[i] = base[i];
	}
	return newArray;
}

const newArr7 = clone(oldArr);

console.log(newArr1, newArr2, newArr3, newArr4, newArr5, newArr6, newArr7);

Be careful when arrays or objects are nested!:

When arrays are nested the values are copied by reference. Here is an example of how this could lead to issues:

let arr1 = [1,2,[1,2,3]]

let arr2 = [...arr1];

arr2[2][0] = 5;  // we change arr2

console.log(arr1);  // arr1 is also changed because the array inside arr1 was copied by reference

So don't use these methods when there are objects or arrays inside your array you want to copy. i.e. Use these methods on arrays of primitives only.

If you do want to deepclone a javascript array use JSON.parse in conjunction with JSON.stringify, like this:

let arr1 = [1,2,[1,2,3]]

let arr2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr1)) ;

arr2[2][0] = 5;

console.log(arr1);  // now I'm not modified because I'm a deep clone

Performance of copying:

So which one do we choose for optimal performance. It turns out that the most verbose method, the for loop has the highest performance. Use the for loop for really CPU intensive copying (large/many arrays).

After that the .slice() method also has decent performance and is also less verbose and easier for the programmer to implement. I suggest to use .slice() for your everyday copying of arrays which aren't very CPU intensive. Also avoid using the JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr)) (lots of overhead) if no deep clone is required and performance is an issue.

Source performance test

2

Using jQuery deep copy could be made as following:

var arr2 = $.extend(true, [], arr1);
2

You can also use ES6 spread operator to copy Array

var arr=[2,3,4,5];
var copyArr=[...arr];
2

Here are few more way to copy:

const array = [1,2,3,4];

const arrayCopy1 = Object.values(array);
const arrayCopy2 = Object.assign([], array);
const arrayCopy3 = array.map(i => i);
const arrayCopy4 = Array.of(...array );

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.